Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
I have no idea why you don't even have libcblas in the readelf output. Are you trying to use your distro atlas or building Sage's own? Is local/lib/libcblas.so broken (ldd -r output)? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

RE: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread Francois Bissey
I am stumped. I will have to think it over for a bit. Output of "ld -v" please. From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com [sage-devel@googlegroups.com] on behalf of shol...@ualberta.ca [shol...@ualberta.ca] Sent: Friday, 7 February 2014 15:51 To: sage-devel@googleg

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
OK I need a bigger gun. Try the same compilation again but add -Wl,-M, then another time but with -Wl,--verbose send me the output. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
yes do both. On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:36:58 shol...@ualberta.ca wrote: > Hmmm it must have worked - no complaints, just another line. Run ldd or > readelf on it? (complex_double.so) > > On Thursday, February 6, 2014 7:24:06 PM UTC-7, François wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:13:37 sho...@ualberta.

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread sholman
Here it is: (sage-sh) sbh@sbh-MacBookPro:sage-6.1.1$ ./sage -sh Starting subshell with Sage environment variables set. Don't forget to exit when you are done. Beware: * Do not do anything with other copies of Sage on your system. * Do not use this for installing Sage packages using "sage -i"

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread sholman
Hi, the only thing I built before this, as a prerequisite, was ppl (parma polyhedra from bugseng) and which I included in the ld.so... path, etc. However, I am doing absolutely nothing special to build sage: untar the source, make. That's it. (I wish I knew more about what was going on) He

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread sholman
I'm pretty sure I got the path outputed by the last compile right - unfortunately, (sage-sh) sbh@sbh-MacBookPro:src$ readelf -d /home/sbh/SW/Sage6.1.1/sage-6.1.1/src/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/sage/rings/complex_double.so Dynamic section at offset 0x2bc68 contains 28 entries: TagTy

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread sholman
Hmmm it must have worked - no complaints, just another line. Run ldd or readelf on it? (complex_double.so) On Thursday, February 6, 2014 7:24:06 PM UTC-7, François wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:13:37 sho...@ualberta.ca wrote: > > Hi, the only thing I built before this, as a prerequisite, w

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:13:37 shol...@ualberta.ca wrote: > Hi, the only thing I built before this, as a prerequisite, was ppl (parma > polyhedra from bugseng) and which I included in the ld.so... path, etc. > However, I am doing absolutely nothing special to build sage: untar the > source, make.

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:34:48 shol...@ualberta.ca wrote: > Thanks for all the effort - appreciate it. > > Here it is. Thanks, nothing obviously suspicious. What does readelf -d src/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/sage/rings/complex_double.so says? -- You received this message because you are subscrib

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread sholman
Hi again, So it didn't seem to complain about "./sage -ba" but still underlinked library... sbh@sbh-MacBookPro:~/SW/Sage6.1.1/sage-6.1.1$ ./sage -sh Starting subshell with Sage environment variables set. Don't forget to exit when you are done. Beware: * Do not do anything with other copies o

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
Send over logs/pkgs/sage-6.1.1.log (compressed) for forensic. On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:21:17 shol...@ualberta.ca wrote: > Hi again, > > So it didn't seem to complain about "./sage -ba" but still underlinked > library... > > sbh@sbh-MacBookPro:~/SW/Sage6.1.1/sage-6.1.1$ ./sage -sh > > Starting sub

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Broken optional packages...

2014-02-06 Thread Thierry
Hi Jean-Pierre, On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 06:00:58AM -0800, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > See also > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/zlyuxWIcERQ/cLPRt2nufr4J > > You surely spotted that, but every compiled cython file is present twice in > the sage tree. Actually, when running "make l

[sage-devel] Re: trouble building pycrypto-2.6.1 (for sage 6.1)

2014-02-06 Thread Volker Braun
Ah, that explains it. We just recently added a "configure" script, which is why you didn't trip over that before. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: trouble building pycrypto-2.6.1 (for sage 6.1)

2014-02-06 Thread Niles Johnson
For the record, I would like to confess that I've now figured the problem out, and it was indeed a wonky environment variable: $PATH! Years ago when I started using sage, I just added the sage root directory to my path, and I've been doing it ever since. I now realize that is a bad idea. The

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
Not healthy at all. Sage itself has not been properly linked. Try "./sage -ba" and then see if complex_double.so is still underlinked. Francois On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:09:10 shol...@ualberta.ca wrote: > Well I've attached the config.log from > > ./local/var/tmp/sage/build/gsl-1.15.p1/src/config.l

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
Actually after a closer exam of a standard sage install, the underdefinition of libraries (libgsl in particular) is built in. Which means that some other part may be broken. From the sage shell what does ldd -r local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/complex_double.so says? Francois -- Yo

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:26:40 shol...@ualberta.ca wrote: > Hi, it didn't seem like too big a file (otherwise I can use UbuntuOne) so I > tar'd the log files up and they are attached. Just the log gsl-1.15.p1.log would have been enough. OK so there is a configuration and linking problem with your g

Re: [sage-devel] Re: trouble building sage with semigroup package installed

2014-02-06 Thread David Roe
I had the same problem, which was solved by running xcode-select --install as Volker (and John Palmieri) suggested. David On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Do you have the xcode command line tools installed? Also, look into > config.log as explained in the error message for

RE: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread Francois Bissey
Still busted. Compress the build log of gsl found under logs/pkgs/ and put it somewhere we can download it. It may be too big for the list. From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com [sage-devel@googlegroups.com] on behalf of shol...@ualberta.ca [shol...@ualberta.c

RE: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread Francois Bissey
Before you proceed with "make" to finish the install check that libgsl is properly built this time. ldd -r shouldn't find any undefined symbols and readelf should show libcblas or libptcblas as one of its output. Francois From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com

Re: [sage-devel] What do we do with patches that touch all files ?

2014-02-06 Thread William Stein
On Feb 6, 2014 10:16 AM, "Nils Bruin" wrote: > > On Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:56:09 AM UTC-8, William wrote: >> >> When we do eventually switch to Python 3, I want to modify the preparse to allow >> use of print as statement still > > That may be challenging. How should the following be parsed

[sage-devel] Re: What do we do with patches that touch all files ?

2014-02-06 Thread Volker Braun
+1 for gradually switching to py3 syntax Its easy to get used to a print function. Old code can be auto-fixed with 2to3. On Thursday, February 6, 2014 4:48:51 PM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybody ! > > My brain having shown its uselessness agsinst the problem I work on, I was > fi

Re: [sage-devel] What do we do with patches that touch all files ?

2014-02-06 Thread Nils Bruin
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:56:09 AM UTC-8, William wrote: > > When we do eventually switch to Python 3, I want to modify the preparse to > allow > use of print as statement still That may be challenging. How should the following be parsed (and which are syntax errors)? print (1,2,3)

Re: [sage-devel] What do we do with patches that touch all files ?

2014-02-06 Thread kcrisman
> > > Yep.I think in library code we should just do it though -- use > print as a function. > > When we do eventually switch to Python 3, I want to modify the preparse to > allow > use of print as statement still, since for interactive use it is very > natural (and not allowing > it will

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread Volker Braun
Boost compiles rather quickly, it is mostly just headers. Only a few support libraries need to be compiled. It is somewhat large (currently 58MB tar.bz2). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-devel] trouble building sage with semigroup package installed

2014-02-06 Thread anne1 . schilling
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:38:28 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2014-02-06 03:41, anne1.s...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:49:15 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > > On 2014-02-04 09:20, Anne Schilling wrote: > > > but it keeps reappearing. >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 6, 2014 12:52:16 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> We only ship a partial boost library, afaik boost-python is not included. >> Installing boost system-wide might work, but I've also had issues with >> conflicti

Re: [sage-devel] What do we do with patches that touch all files ?

2014-02-06 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody ! > > My brain having shown its uselessness agsinst the problem I work on, I was > fishing for patches needing review. > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15784 > > What do we do with this ? > > 1) Do we care if something is no

[sage-devel] What do we do with patches that touch all files ?

2014-02-06 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello everybody ! My brain having shown its uselessness agsinst the problem I work on, I was fishing for patches needing review. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15784 What do we do with this ? 1) Do we care if something is not Python 3 compatible ? 2) Do we care if a patch touches everything ?

Re: [sage-devel] trouble building sage with semigroup package installed

2014-02-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-02-06 03:41, anne1.schill...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:49:15 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2014-02-04 09:20, Anne Schilling wrote: > but it keeps reappearing. What you mean with this? How can I tell make not to install semigroupe any longer then

[sage-devel] Re: trouble building sage with semigroup package installed

2014-02-06 Thread Volker Braun
Do you have the xcode command line tools installed? Also, look into config.log as explained in the error message for details. On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:24:21 PM UTC, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > Hi! > > I am also having an issue building the latest version of Sage. An oddity > is that whil

[sage-devel] Re: trouble building sage with semigroup package installed

2014-02-06 Thread Ben Salisbury
Hi! I am also having an issue building the latest version of Sage. An oddity is that while is does not build on my laptop, is does build on my desktop (both of which are running OS X 10.9.1). Here is my output: Bens-MacBook-Pro-3:sage-git Ben$ git checkout develop Switched to branch 'devel

[sage-devel] Re: error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 12:52:16 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > We only ship a partial boost library, afaik boost-python is not included. > Installing boost system-wide might work, but I've also had issues with > conflicting versions. But its worth a shot, for starters. > > Really, we

[sage-devel] Re: error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread Volker Braun
Boost python also has a shared library component that should be under local/lib/libboost_python.so or so. But we don't install it correctly. Probably because that would be harder with the cropped boost, you can easily just copy some of the headers but to build a subset you need to deal with the

[sage-devel] Re: error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 12:52:16 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > We only ship a partial boost library, afaik boost-python is not included. > But there is a python folder in the src of the partial boost library. So I thought boost-python was included... sage-5.12/spkg/standard/boost_cro

[sage-devel] Re: error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread Volker Braun
We only ship a partial boost library, afaik boost-python is not included. Installing boost system-wide might work, but I've also had issues with conflicting versions. But its worth a shot, for starters. Really, we should just ship all of boost. See also Martin Raum's recent post... On Thurs

[sage-devel] error: cannot find the flags to link with Boost python

2014-02-06 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Hi sage-devel, Since the presentation of Vaucanson 2.0 at a Sage meeting in Paris, I am trying to install it and use it from sage. [1] http://wiki.sagemath.org/GroupeUtilisateursParis [2] https://www.lrde.epita.fr/wiki/Vaucanson/Vaucanson2b3 I installed the experimental package gcc-4.8.1.spkg b

RE: [sage-devel] Error installing package conway_polynomials-0.5.p0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - Sage 6.1.1

2014-02-06 Thread Francois Bissey
OK your gsl install is completely broken but atlas is there. Can you try to re-install gsl? "./sage -f gsl" should do the trick. If it still doesn't work post the build log from gsl (found under logs/pkgs). Francois From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com [sage-

[sage-devel] 3 postdoc or research engineer positions open in Grenoble, Lyon and Paris, France

2014-02-06 Thread Clement Pernet
Hi, I'd like to advertise these 3 job offers that should interest the sage developper community. In particular, some of the code development in these jobs concerns parallelization of libraries either used in sage (LinBox; fpLLL) or of potential interest for sage (FGb). Part of the job include i