On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:18 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2013 1:57 AM, "Torsten" wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > there are two very interesting talks about
> >
> > 'Salvus: Distributed Scalable Online Mathematical Software'
> >
> > using SAGE as TCP-based server, see
> >
> > http://www
I came across your very interesting project recently.
While I'm not involved in mathematical research myself, I am the facilitator
of the open source SIMPL project (http://www.icanprogram.com/simpl).It
struck me as I scanned the material (including videos) on your website that the
interfac
On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 16:54:12 UTC+2, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 24 Apr 2013, Jernej Azarija wrote:
> > 4. Optimized linear algebra over small fields with M4RI
>
> and on: http://azi.dev.si/GSOC2013_proposal2.html
> > Integrate the M4RI routines and thus speed up computation
On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 13:52:06 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 04/24/2013 12:51 PM, Jernej Azarija wrote:
> > 3. Slow startup of Sage
> This is already a Sage GSOC project, check out the projects page. It
> would certainly be good to work on this.
>
> Yes yes! I included that in thi
On 04/24/2013 04:52 PM, Martin Raum wrote:
Implementing a workaround
for all OS's then is essentially equivalent to skipping part of the
test
I don't agree with this statement. The test is about the functioning of
pexpect, not about OS-specific timings. It's not the job of Sage to test
the oper
On Wednesday 24 Apr 2013, Jernej Azarija wrote:
> 4. Optimized linear algebra over small fields with M4RI
and on: http://azi.dev.si/GSOC2013_proposal2.html
> Integrate the M4RI routines and thus speed up computations over the covered
> fields.
M4RI *is* in Sage and so is M4RIE. So I am puzzled w
I must say that I saw the ticket and was about to review it, because nobody
had done this so far. But I read Volker's comment, and I agree with him.
Perhaps the reason for the failure of all of us to review this ticket is
that not only Volker feels uncomfortable with such a change.
I don't know
Hi Tobias.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:47:06PM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 11:46 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> >part of my proposal is
> >to make it possible to just install sage ("the distribution") skipping
> >everything but the core modules and the notebook.
>
> So your plan is t
I don't think there is a bad consequence for repeatedly checking the status
of a terminated child process with exponential backoff. Its just really
weird that you would ever do that if your OS works correctly. And IMHO it
hurts code maintainability. Not to mention debugging, assuming that you ar
On 04/24/2013 11:46 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
part of my proposal is
to make it possible to just install sage ("the distribution") skipping
everything but the core modules and the notebook.
So your plan is to make it possible to run configure and make for each
directory in /src separately, bu
On 04/24/2013 02:37 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
For the record, I disagree with the approach to both #14371 and #14460
in that fugly workarounds to fundamental bugs in Solaris or a particular
gcc version are applied liberally to, basically, everyone. Sure,
sometimes it is necessary to work around bug
For the record, I disagree with the approach to both #14371 and #14460 in
that fugly workarounds to fundamental bugs in Solaris or a particular gcc
version are applied liberally to, basically, everyone. Sure, sometimes it
is necessary to work around bugs, but that should be a special case and no
*ping*
This sage-5.9 blocker still needs review:
#14371: Race condition in singular doctest
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14371
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On Apr 24, 2013 1:57 AM, "Torsten" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there are two very interesting talks about
>
> 'Salvus: Distributed Scalable Online Mathematical Software'
>
> using SAGE as TCP-based server, see
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-CDGXMh6rQ#t=37m07s
>
> and
>
> http://www.youtube.com/wat
On 04/24/2013 12:51 PM, Jernej Azarija wrote:
3. Slow startup of Sage
This is already a Sage GSOC project, check out the projects page. It
would certainly be good to work on this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe f
Hello!
In the discussion about my (potential) participation in GSOC2013 ( see
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sage-gsoc/J-oU64VM7Pw )
we came to the conclusion that it would be nice to address the following
performance issues :
1. Slow performance of combinatorial functions
I'm happy to change this link, I only hesitate because it gives the
wrong impression that we have already switched to git.
H
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a link on the sagemath.org web site homepage to the Sage source
> code (where it says "open source
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:40:27 AM UTC+2, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> Also, how about the integration with the wiki? That was handcoded by mike
>> hansen (if i remember correctly) to prevent the excessive spamming.
>> Requests for modifying the wiki also end up as trac account requests. I
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 06:08:54PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> I will make a few comments, attempting to be as constructive
> as possible :-)
Hi Paolo, hi list.
Thanks for going through all this. i'll consider your comments as far
as the scope of this project allows.
> The
Hello,
there are two very interesting talks about
'Salvus: Distributed Scalable Online Mathematical Software'
using SAGE as TCP-based server, see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-CDGXMh6rQ#t=37m07s
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fftL-RiRCUY#t=1h14m18s
It is said, that source code of 'Sa
20 matches
Mail list logo
