[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.7.2 make failure on Thinkpad T-40 with Oneiric Ubuntu - maxima fails to build

> It seems that properties of the host CPU are passed over to the VM > guest as indicated > here,https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=33954 Maybe there is a chance with VirtualBox: I found the following in the documentation of the VBoxManage command: VBoxManage --synthcpu on|off: Th

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.7.2 make failure on Thinkpad T-40 with Oneiric Ubuntu - maxima fails to build

> Despite being 32-bit, the VM still sees a very modern processor, though, so > it is possible something could go wrong on old hardware. If someone advises > me on exactly what to do, I could try building a binary that should be > usable on old machines. Would it be enough to do > > export SAGE_FA

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.7.2 make failure on Thinkpad T-40 with Oneiric Ubuntu - maxima fails to build

I'm not really sure. I'm hoping that someone else might have some more advice. It would be easier to diagnose these failures if they could be replicated. Some other thoughts: More information about your machine might be useful, like the output from 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', and the amount of ram + swap

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

> > > Making all in yasm > > > make[4]: Entering directory `/home/Administrator/sage-4.8.alpha3/spkg/ > > > build/mpir-2.1.3.p8/src/yasm' > > > gcc -std=gnu99 -I.  -c -o genperf.o `test -f tools/genperf/genperf.c > > > || echo './'`tools/genperf/genperf.c > > > > > > gcc -std=gnu99 -I.  -c -o re2

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.7.2 make failure on Thinkpad T-40 with Oneiric Ubuntu - maxima fails to build

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 04:04:48PM -0800, Jonathan Bober wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > Are other people really having problems building on Ubuntu 11.10? I've had > > no problems building sage 4.8.2 on 64-bit Ubuntu 11.10. Also, I just tried > > on 32-bit 11.10

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.7.2 make failure on Thinkpad T-40 with Oneiric Ubuntu - maxima fails to build

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > Are other people really having problems building on Ubuntu 11.10? I've had > no problems building sage 4.8.2 on 64-bit Ubuntu 11.10. Also, I just tried > on 32-bit 11.10 in a virtual machine, and sage built without any problems. > (Running

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.7.2 make failure on Thinkpad T-40 with Oneiric Ubuntu - maxima fails to build

It's a shame this has gone unreplied to for so long. (Unless I missed a reply in another thread. I'm may be confused by the various threads, which is why I'm only replying on sage-devel.) Are other people really having problems building on Ubuntu 11.10? I've had no problems building sage 4.8.2 on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

On Saturday 03 December 2011 23:49:09 Jason wrote: > On Saturday 03 December 2011 22:46:46 kcrisman wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > > > >> I have a repeatable failure. This is presumably due to the MPIR > > > > >> upgrade in 4.8.alpha0, > > > > >> seehttp://trac.sage

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

On Saturday 03 December 2011 22:46:46 kcrisman wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > > >> I have a repeatable failure. This is presumably due to the MPIR > > > >> upgrade in 4.8.alpha0, > > > >> seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8664, > > > > > > Ah, I'm pretty sure

[sage-devel] Re: [mpir-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

On Saturday 03 December 2011 22:40:51 Cactus wrote: > I can only comment on the MSVC Windows build, for which I believe mpir.h is > identical DLL and static library builds. To double check this I have just > built both and compared the two mpir.h files that were generated. > > In fact mpir.h i

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

> > > On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > >> I have a repeatable failure.  This is presumably due to the MPIR > > >> upgrade in 4.8.alpha0, seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8664, > > > > Ah, I'm pretty sure yes. > > > >> configure: error: cannot build both static and DLL, since mpi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage matrix

[I've set the "reply-to" field so that, one hopes, further discussion will happen on sage-support]. On Dec 3, 2011, at 05:34 , daveloeffler wrote: > > On Dec 3, 10:45 am, Chappman wrote: >> >> On Dec 3, 4:28 am, "Justin C. Walker" wrote: >>> >>> It's still not clear (at least to me) what yo

[sage-devel] Re: [mpir-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

On Saturday 03 December 2011 19:13:41 Bill Hart wrote: > Forwarding to MPIR devel, where it might get some attention. > > On 3 December 2011 19:08, kcrisman wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote: > >> I have a repeatable failure. This is presumably due to the MPIR > >> upgrade in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage matrix

On Dec 3, 2011, at 02:45 , Chappman wrote: > Yes, thats what I am trying to do. Is there a method to go about this? It will help the rest of us help you if you stick to one list. The Support list is probably more appropriate. Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large, Director Institut

[sage-devel] Re: error: ppl.hh not found

This is not a bug in Sage! This is particular to the Linux distribution that I am using! The copy of Sage that I have is using the system version of ppl. That's why the file ppl.hh is not placed in the default directory, I think. Sorry for the false alarm. It didn't occur to me that this could be

[sage-devel] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

On Dec 3, 2:13 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > Forwarding to MPIR devel, where it might get some attention. Thanks. > > -    SAGE_CONF_OPTS="--enable-shared --disable-static" > > +   # Also build the static library to be used by e.g. ECM: > > +   # SAGE_CONF_OPTS="--enable-shared --disable-static" > >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-windows] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

Forwarding to MPIR devel, where it might get some attention. On 3 December 2011 19:08, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote: >> I have a repeatable failure.  This is presumably due to the MPIR >> upgrade in 4.8.alpha0, seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8664, > > Ah,

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

Le 03/12/2011 20:07, John H Palmieri a écrit : Take a look at the Sage installation guide, http://sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html#environment-variables in particular the ATLAS variables. Thanks. Snark on #sagemath -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.

[sage-devel] Re: Cygwin attempt with sage-4.8.alpha3

On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote: > I have a repeatable failure.  This is presumably due to the MPIR > upgrade in 4.8.alpha0, seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8664, Ah, I'm pretty sure yes. > configure: error: cannot build both static and DLL, since mpir.h is > different for each.

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

On Saturday, December 3, 2011 10:45:10 AM UTC-8, Snark wrote: > > Le 03/12/2011 19:27, William Stein a �crit : > > Thanks for the updated ticket. I will probably just use the ubuntu > > atlas binary instead of building atlas, to avoid trouble with that. > > How does one do that for atlas? Fo

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

Le 03/12/2011 19:27, William Stein a écrit : Thanks for the updated ticket. I will probably just use the ubuntu atlas binary instead of building atlas, to avoid trouble with that. How does one do that for atlas? For other things? Snark on #sagemath -- To post to this group, send an email t

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

On Dec 3, 2011 1:31 AM, "Julien Puydt" wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 03/12/2011 09:19, William Stein a écrit : >> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: >>> >>> I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the >>> >>> progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may com

[sage-devel] Re: error: ppl.hh not found

This works for me. Are you compiling from source or is this a binary distribution, did you upgrade at one point from a previous version? Does the ppl.hh file exist anywhere in your sage directory tree? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: News about the ARM port

Le 03/12/2011 17:16, kcrisman a écrit : Oh dear ; can't it get the version number itself like a big kid!? The idea is that one can make longer name versions for different purposes - like different architectures. Point taken, though - maybe there's even a ticket for a "default" version... In fa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

On 04/12/11 03:13, Jan Groenewald wrote: Dear Francis, > are you planning to create a ppa and if so will you support i386 as well as 64 bit I love to install it at home also the 64 bit would do for work I hope so, but I am very busy with other things now. This might only happen next year M

[sage-devel] Re: News about the ARM port

> Oh dear ; can't it get the version number itself like a big kid!? The idea is that one can make longer name versions for different purposes - like different architectures. Point taken, though - maybe there's even a ticket for a "default" version... > In fact, I sometimes have the impression that

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

Dear Francis, > are you planning to create a ppa and if so will you support i386 as well as 64 bit I love to install it at home also the 64 bit would do for work I hope so, but I am very busy with other things now. This might only happen next year March or Arpil. Regards, Jan -- .~. /V\

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

On 03/12/11 23:46, Jan Groenewald wrote: Hi On 3 December 2011 14:18, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: On 2011-12-03 13:14, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Well that answered itself pretty quickly, about 3 seconds into make: > configure: Sorry, the 'm4' command must b

Re: [sage-devel] Re: News about the ARM port

Le 03/12/2011 16:41, kcrisman a écrit : On Dec 3, 4:58 am, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 03/12/2011 09:21, William Stein a crit : ... since I may be interested in trying a binary from you, which you could make with "sage -bdist" or just by tarring up your existing install of Sage, if you have the

[sage-devel] Re: News about the ARM port

On Dec 3, 4:58 am, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 03/12/2011 09:21, William Stein a crit : > > > ... since I may be interested in trying a binary from you, which you > > could make with "sage -bdist" or just by tarring up your existing > > install of Sage, if you have the disk space. > > I'm not sure

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Symmetric polynomial in terms of elementary symmetric polynomials

On 2011/12/03, at 03:23, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Hi, > I tried your code, and got an error. > Could you please post an example of usage of your functions, and also tell us > which version of Sage it is known to run on. > (Sage has a doctest facility, so for your code to be incorporated into Sage

[sage-devel] Re: sage matrix

On Dec 3, 10:45 am, Chappman wrote: > > On Dec 3, 4:28 am, "Justin C. Walker" wrote: > > > > It's still not clear (at least to me) what you mean by this. Do you want Q > > to be a copy of U, and be able to change, say, U, without changing Q? > > Yes, thats what I am trying to do. Is there a me

[sage-devel] error: ppl.hh not found

When I build the Sage library with the command sage -b somebranch the library is built, but I get the following error message near the end of the process: -- error: /opt/sage/local/include/ppl.hh: No such file or directory sage: There was an error installing modified sage library code. -

Re: [sage-devel] Qepcad doctests (#11933) needs review

The patch mentioned below for qepcad doctests needs review. I don't personally care at all about the experimental package qepcad, but there is some code which breaks when running as a different user from the one which installed Sage. So that's why we need this patch: On 2011-10-29 20:36, Jeroen

Re: [sage-devel] New sympow spkg (#11920) needs review

Please review, this is important for porting sympow and for eventually allowing doctests to run as a different user (see #5155). To review this, there is no need to understand what sympow does, only the installation is changed: On 2011-10-29 20:42, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > I have a sympow spkg at

Re: [sage-devel] Cardinality for polynomial quotient rings (#11947) needs review

Please review: On 2011-10-29 20:29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Hello, > > Currenly quotient rings of polynomial rings do not have a cardinality() > method. The patch at #11947 implements this (essentially, the > cardinality equals the cardinality of the base field to the power the > degree of the m

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

Thanks, I created a ticket at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12112 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

Hi On 3 December 2011 14:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2011-12-03 13:14, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Well that answered itself pretty quickly, about 3 seconds into make: > > configure: Sorry, the 'm4' command must be in the path to build Sage > Really? That's a bug (maybe the bug is in *checking

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

On 2011-12-03 13:14, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Well that answered itself pretty quickly, about 3 seconds into make: > configure: Sorry, the 'm4' command must be in the path to build Sage Really? That's a bug (maybe the bug is in *checking* for m4, because it is not needed). Please elaborate: post y

[sage-devel] Re: Minimum build requirements

Well that answered itself pretty quickly, about 3 seconds into make: configure: Sorry, the 'm4' command must be in the path to build Sage Should someone update that first link below? Regards, Jan On 3 December 2011 14:12, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to ascertain the minimum build

[sage-devel] Minimum build requirements

Hi I am trying to ascertain the minimum build requirements on a new Ubuntu (let's say 11.10) install to build sage. http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html does not contain m4. Is it necessary? http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/src/README.txt contains m4. It looks like gcc g++ gfortran

[sage-devel] Re: sage matrix

Yes, thats what I am trying to do. Is there a method to go about this? Kind Regards Chappman On Dec 3, 4:28 am, "Justin C. Walker" wrote: > On Dec 2, 2011, at 20:19 , Chappman wrote: > > > What I am trying to do is have matrix Q to have the values of matrix U > > for the different i and j's. Is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Disallowing 4.x -> 5.x upgrades

On 2011-12-02 19:14, Volker Braun wrote: > Slightly OT, but I have been thinking about how updates should be done: Also something else which is crucial: when upgrade, we should always upgrade sage_root first before anything else. Since sage_root contains important scripts like sage-env, sage-spkg

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

Le 03/12/2011 09:21, William Stein a écrit : ... since I may be interested in trying a binary from you, which you could make with "sage -bdist" or just by tarring up your existing install of Sage, if you have the disk space. I'm not sure I have the disk space, but I gave it a try : ./sage -bdis

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

Hi, Le 03/12/2011 09:19, William Stein a écrit : On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching. Is there any chance you could create a trac met

Re: [sage-devel] Symmetric polynomial in terms of elementary symmetric polynomials

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:22:32AM -0300, Federico Lebrón wrote: > I've written a small pair of functions which could be useful: > > 1) A function is_symmetric which, given a polynomial, returns whether > or not the polynomial is a symmetric polynomial. > 2) A function symmetrize whic

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:19 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydt > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the >> progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching. > > Hi, > > Is there any ch

Re: [sage-devel] News about the ARM port

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the > progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching. Hi, Is there any chance you could create a trac metaticket, i.e., something like [1] that