Le 03/12/2011 16:41, kcrisman a écrit :
On Dec 3, 4:58 am, Julien Puydt<julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote:
Le 03/12/2011 09:21, William Stein a crit :
... since I may be interested in trying a binary from you, which you
could make with "sage -bdist" or just by tarring up your existing
install of Sage, if you have the disk space.
I'm not sure I have the disk space, but I gave it a try :
./sage -bdist
** MISSING VERSION NUMBER! **
Right! See http://ask.sagemath.org/question/417/exact-syntax-for-bdist
for a good answer about the syntax. Not that you'll be able to bdist
on that setup while also compiling, most likely :)
Oh dear ; can't it get the version number itself like a big kid!?
And indeed, it's still compiling so I won't be able to bdist that soon.
In fact, I sometimes have the impression that compiling sage is 90%
atlas 9% documentation and 1% everything else.
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
