[sage-devel] Author/Reviewer names

2011-08-22 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Hello all, This is a remainder that all ticket authors or reviewers should add their real name on Trac when authoring/reviewing a ticket. Most regular Sage developers already do this (except for this guy "was" :-) ) but you should also tell your students or colleagues doing an occasional Sage pat

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Chris Seberino
On Aug 22, 4:34 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > What about: > > var('a,b,x1') > > x1 (a+b) In order to deal with this situation, as well as the conditional "(this) or (that)", my simple regex would need to be changed to only trigger when a *VARIABLE* was followed by a space and left parens. In fact, th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Chris Seberino wrote: > On Aug 22, 3:07 pm, Nils Bruin wrote: > >> One gotcha would be someone wanting to spell out an expression with >> spaces: >> >> a / ( b + c ) >> >> or logical expressions: >> >> ( x >-10 and x < -5 ) or ( x > 5 and x < 10 ) > > No! I thi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE installation solved

2011-08-22 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi Evans This is only for the ATLAS compilation, which compiles (basci linear algebra routines): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatically_Tuned_Linear_Algebra_Software It is perfectly safe, and recommended to get better battery life, to turn the CPU frequency back to "on demand". Most of the ti

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE installation solved

2011-08-22 Thread Evans Doe Ocansey
Hi Jan, Using the commands sudo apt-add-repository ppa:artfwo/ppa sudo aptitude update sudo aptitude -y install indicator-cpufreq indicator-cpufreq & you gave to increase my CPU performance, sage now works. Thanks :-) On Aug 21, 5:36 am, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi Evans > > On 21 August 2011

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Jason Grout
On 8/22/11 4:09 PM, Chris Seberino wrote: On Aug 22, 3:07 pm, Nils Bruin wrote: One gotcha would be someone wanting to spell out an expression with spaces: a / ( b + c ) or logical expressions: ( x>-10 and x< -5 ) or ( x> 5 and x< 10 ) No! I think you are interpreting my little hu

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Chris Seberino
On Aug 22, 3:07 pm, Nils Bruin wrote: > One gotcha would be someone wanting to spell out an expression with > spaces: > >  a / ( b + c ) > > or logical expressions: > > ( x >-10 and x < -5 ) or ( x > 5 and x < 10 ) No! I think you are interpreting my little humble proposal to be more grander

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Nils Bruin
On Aug 21, 7:45 pm, Chris Seberino wrote: > In other words, have a regex like "\w\s\(" that replaces the > whitespace with "*" giving > "\w\*\(". > Is this feasible?  I'm trying to think if there are any hidden gotchas > I don't know about. One gotcha would be someone wanting to spell out an expr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:09 AM, kcrisman wrote: > See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information > (it looks like you found this). > > I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be >>10 or <10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't dare to > spec

Re: [sage-devel] Re: testing sage notebook

2011-08-22 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:18 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:24 AM, defeo wrote: >> On Aug 6, 12:47 pm, Rado wrote: >>> I just reverted *.sagenb.org to the state it was in 2 days ago. >> >> What's the status of *.sagenb.org, right now? I haven't been able to >> create new w

Re: [sage-devel] Re: testing sage notebook

2011-08-22 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:24 AM, defeo wrote: > On Aug 6, 12:47 pm, Rado wrote: >> I just reverted *.sagenb.org to the state it was in 2 days ago. > > What's the status of *.sagenb.org, right now? I haven't been able to > create new worksheets or open old ones in the past few days on www.sagenb.o

[sage-devel] Re: testing sage notebook

2011-08-22 Thread defeo
On Aug 6, 12:47 pm, Rado wrote: > I just reverted *.sagenb.org to the state it was in 2 days ago. What's the status of *.sagenb.org, right now? I haven't been able to create new worksheets or open old ones in the past few days on www.sagenb.org: I invariably get an "Internal Server Error". Thank

[sage-devel] Re: sage -upgrade aborts - uncommitted changes

2011-08-22 Thread Maarten Derickx
Dear Kevin, In the sage source tree there are multiple repositories, so you probably fixed it for one repository but still have uncommitted changes in others. Below is a list of the 5 repositories relatively to SAGE_ROOT (the . one is SAGE_ROOT itself) ., data/extcode, devel/sage/, devel/sagenb

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Chris Seberino
On Aug 22, 8:09 am, kcrisman wrote: > speculate.  But you could open a ticket and have people discuss it > there, especially if it proved quite useful and natural for your > work.  You could probably also hack your own copy, though that is less > optimal, in my opinion. Thanks for feedback. I'm

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread Chris Seberino
On Aug 22, 8:09 am, kcrisman wrote: > See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information > (it looks like you found this). > > I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be>10 or > <10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't dare to > > speculate.  

[sage-devel] Very easy reviews

2011-08-22 Thread kcrisman
Perhaps Bug Days fodder: The following ticket needs *only* sanity-check review - that it is correctly formed in its spkg, and that it installs and works right on some 'standard' platform. All changes are from upstream in CVS in any case. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9 The follo

[sage-devel] sage -upgrade aborts - uncommitted changes

2011-08-22 Thread Kevin Horton
I'm trying to upgrade sage on two boxes from 4.7 to 4.7.1. "sage -upgrade" fails with "There are uncommitted changes in the Sage root repository. Aborting." On one box, "sage -hg diff" found that I had modified SAGE_ROOT, so I undid that. But it still complains about uncommitted changes, even

[sage-devel] Re: Idea for new implicit_multiplication level to handle "x (x)". Please tell me if it would easily work.

2011-08-22 Thread kcrisman
See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information (it looks like you found this). I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be >10 or <10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't dare to speculate. But you could open a ticket and have people discuss

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE installation problem

2011-08-22 Thread Evans Doe Ocansey
Hi Jan, Below are the links to the files you requested. http://users.aims.ac.za/~evans/sage-bugs/error_UNKNOWNx8632SSE3.tgz http://users.aims.ac.za/~evans/sage-bugs/dMMCACHEEDGE.LOG On Aug 21, 5:36 am, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi Evans > > On 21 August 2011 05:11, leif wrote: > > > Looks like

Re: [sage-devel] Problem install graphviz because of duplicate entry in libpng12.pc

2011-08-22 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-08-22 00:38, MartinX wrote: > Graphviz would not install as pkg-config was not reading the > pangocairo.pc in the grphviz configure file in the sage environment so > it was not setting the includes correctly. Cause is a duplication of > SAGE_ROOT definition in sage's local libpng12.pc. T

[sage-devel] Re: Problem install graphviz because of duplicate entry in libpng12.pc

2011-08-22 Thread Jason Grout
On 8/21/11 5:38 PM, MartinX wrote: Graphviz would not install as pkg-config was not reading the pangocairo.pc in the grphviz configure file in the sage environment so it was not setting the includes correctly. Cause is a duplication of SAGE_ROOT definition in sage's local libpng12.pc. This pro