On Aug 22, 8:09 am, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information
> (it looks like you found this).
>
> I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be>10 or
> <10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't dare to
>
> speculate. But you could open a ticket and have people discuss it
> there, especially if it proved quite useful and natural for your
> work. You could probably also hack your own copy, though that is less
> optimal, in my opinion.
licit_multiplication(10) still does not interpret "x (x)" as x^2
> > but rather as a function call.
> > Rarely do I put a space between the function name and the argument
> > list.
>
> > It would seem to be a useful new option to allow implicit
> > multiplication that interprets
> > a letter followed by a space and an open parens as multiplication.
>
> > In other words, have a regex like "\w\s\(" that replaces the
> > whitespace with "*" giving
> > "\w\*\(".
>
> > Is this feasible? I'm trying to think if there are any hidden gotchas
> > I don't know about.
>
> > Sincerely,
>
> > Chris
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
