On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:09 AM, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information > (it looks like you found this). > > I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be >>10 or <10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't dare to > speculate.
I'd say level >10, as it is even stronger than level 10. > But you could open a ticket and have people discuss it > there, especially if it proved quite useful and natural for your > work. You could probably also hack your own copy, though that is less > optimal, in my opinion. It's worth opening a ticket, but I find discussion easier to follow and respond to on the actual lists, especially for something as open-ended as this. - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
