See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information
(it looks like you found this).
I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be
>10 or <10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't dare to
speculate. But you could open a ticket and have people discuss it
there, especially if it proved quite useful and natural for your
work. You could probably also hack your own copy, though that is less
optimal, in my opinion.
- kcrisman
On Aug 21, 10:45 pm, Chris Seberino <cseber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> implicit_multiplication(10) still does not interpret "x (x)" as x^2
> but rather as a function call.
> Rarely do I put a space between the function name and the argument
> list.
>
> It would seem to be a useful new option to allow implicit
> multiplication that interprets
> a letter followed by a space and an open parens as multiplication.
>
> In other words, have a regex like "\w\s\(" that replaces the
> whitespace with "*" giving
> "\w\*\(".
>
> Is this feasible? I'm trying to think if there are any hidden gotchas
> I don't know about.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chris
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
