sage --version gives
Sage Version 4.6.2, Release Date: 2011-02-25
how do I find out about the "alpha"?
On 13 mai, 19:34, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I do not have too many versions of Sage available to me at the moment,
> but:
>
> Your example works properly on 4.6.2.alpha3
>
> Your example fails on 4
On Fri, 13 May 2011 at 07:00AM -0400, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
> Anyway, give me some examples, and one or two weeks, and I'll try to
> produce a prototype.
That's the kind of answer I was hoping for! "Give me your problem, and
I'll find a solution for you." Excellent! :)
Here's what I was working w
On 14 mai, 06:23, Roman Pearce wrote:
> > I'm curious to know if performance of Maple 15 are following the same as
>
> for Maple 14.
>
> Very similar.
My question was motivated by the fact that SDMP in Maple 14 seems to
be slower *in real time* with more than 4 cores for sparse
multiplication
> I'm curious to know if performance of Maple 15 are following the same as
for Maple 14.
Very similar. SDMP was refactored for Maple 15. It's size was cut in half,
it was made re-entrant to allow parallel polynomial algorithms, and we now
support Zp for multiprecision p. We added Kronecker s
On May 12, 11:13 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
> would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
> whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
> in about a week o
I do not have too many versions of Sage available to me at the moment,
but:
Your example works properly on 4.6.2.alpha3
Your example fails on 4.6.2.alpha4 and 4.7.rc0
The failure is at the same place as in the initial report.
Pierre - What version are you using?
The only ticket merged betwe
Thanks, this works... sometimes. But the following still fails:
sage: G = QuaternionGroup()
sage: H = direct_product_permgroups([G, G])
sage: K= direct_product_permgroups([H, G])
Gap produced error output
Syntax error: expression expected
$sage17:=;;
^
executing $sage17:=;;
any thou
On 05/13/11 07:45 PM, kcrisman wrote:
$ export SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD=yes
$ export MAKE='make -j8'
$ make
See the installation guide for information about the relevant environment
variables. I think that we should set SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD to "yes"
automatically -- it works very well, a
> > $ export SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD=yes
> > $ export MAKE='make -j8'
> > $ make
>
> > See the installation guide for information about the relevant environment
> > variables. I think that we should set SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD to "yes"
> > automatically -- it works very well, according to everyo
I believe they are advertising on SDMP polynomial multiplication for
the parallel symbolic compution. TRIP has an interesting benchmarks
about that:
http://www.imcce.fr/Equipes/ASD/trip/features.php
I'm curious to know if performance of Maple 15 are following the same
as for Maple 14.
--
To post
On 13 Maj, 11:59, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> The last command there is sage -br, and it perhaps rebuilt the p9 spkg?
>
> Try just do again
>
> sage -f http://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/python-2.6.4.p10.spkg
>
It helped! Thanks. :)
I don't really get how, since I had removed the p9 spkg from spkg/
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:38:38 PM UTC-7, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Volker Braun
>> wrote:
>> > IMHO the list of installed files is an integral piece of package
>> > management
>> > and should explici
Hi Thierry
On May 13, 11:04 am, Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Asimulo seems great: it does exactly what I wanted to do: integrate
> Radau5 in Sage. Radau5 is from far the best method for the integration
> of (very) stiff ODEs...
>
I couldn't find an Assimulo example with Radau5.
I tweaked t
I wrote a script to create a virtual machine with Sage and export it as an
OVA appliance. I'm using VirtualBox but I think VMware should support it,
too. At this point it would be useful if people could try it out on a
variety of host machines. I built the following Sage appliance to test:
http
On May 13, 9:51 am, William Stein wrote:
> 2011/5/13 kcrisman :
>
> > FYI
>
> >http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/index.aspx?P=TC-...
>
> > Among other things, they are *really* touting their multi-core and GPU
> > use (as opposed to Mma) and there is also a lot of talk about t
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
> would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
> whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
> in abou
2011/5/13 kcrisman :
> FYI
>
> http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/index.aspx?P=TC-1975
>
> Among other things, they are *really* touting their multi-core and GPU
> use (as opposed to Mma) and there is also a lot of talk about their
> sharing features.
I looked at that page and th
On 05/12/2011 09:38:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated.
I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(),
FYI
http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/index.aspx?P=TC-1975
Among other things, they are *really* touting their multi-core and GPU
use (as opposed to Mma) and there is also a lot of talk about their
sharing features. I have a feeling that some of their claims about
polynomials
On 5/13/11 6:00 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
On 5/13/11, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated.
Hi,
On 7 Mai, 07:04, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On May 6, 9:12 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi:
>
> > The contribution at #10153 byThomasFeulneris huge and,
> > IMHO, important. It basically generalizes what Robert Miller did for
> > automorphisms of codes in the binary case to the non-binary
On 5/13/11, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> If I have a Sage expression, I can do
>>
>> latex(foo)
>>
>> to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
>>
>> Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
>> find it easier to loo
Hi
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:28:38AM -0700, Lilavati wrote:
> On 24 Kwi, 15:26, pipedream wrote:
> > We expect below spkg to be in sage 4.7.1. In the meantime, if you
> > runUbuntu11.04(Natty)
> > and stable sage 4.6.2, you can replace SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/
> > python-2.6.4.p9.spkg
> > with
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Ooch ! That's bad indeed, and it is probably my fault...
I think it was my fault, not Nathann's. It seems to be a problem
in a function _slider01 which is internal
to the ryser algorithm used by gale_ryser_theorem.
A patch trac_11324.2.patc
> So what you have in mind is:
>
> * automatically generate the list of files from *sequential* builds,
> store it in spkg (or possibly somewhere else)
>
> * use this in all default builds (either parallel or sequential), Sage
> would store the list of files somewhere, and use it for uninstall
>
>
Hello,
Asimulo seems great: it does exactly what I wanted to do: integrate
Radau5 in Sage. Radau5 is from far the best method for the integration
of (very) stiff ODEs...
Le 13/05/2011 10:30, Guilherme a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> I did two simple spkg (Sage package) one for SUNDIALS and another fo
Dear all,
I did two simple spkg (Sage package) one for SUNDIALS and another for
Assimulo.
These are very thin wrappers on the original source code, no patches.
Here are the links, (Dropbox in the lack of a better place :) )
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/29028094/sundials-2.4.0.spkg
http://dl.dropbox.co
27 matches
Mail list logo
