On 05/12/2011 09:38:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated.
I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(),
paste
the result into a document, then typeset.
Conversely, sometimes I write something in LaTeX and would like to do
some calculations with it. So I'd like to call...something, paste the
result into Sage, and compute.
I'm generally working with reasonably simple symbolic expressions. Is
this possible? I know that a full parser is practically impossible,
but
it seems like a relatively simple parser could work pretty well.
I think I'm asking for a complement to Rob Beezer's tex2sws. Thoughts?
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
----- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
-------
Is anyone familiar with "Cadabra" (I'm not, but it appears to have tex
input processing ...)
http://cadabra.phi-sci.com/
-Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
