On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this. Btw, I just revived this cython based line profiler:
>>
>> http://github.com/certik/line_profiler
>>
>
> Is Robert K not maintaining the original anymore?
I hope
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> sage: isinstance(SR,
> sage.rings.principal_ideal_domain.PrincipalIdealDomain)
> False
sage: SR.is_field()
True
> and this creates problems in FreeModule_generic_pid constructor. I am
> working on #9502 and when I tried to swi
I guess so:
sage: type(SR^3)
However
sage: isinstance(SR,
sage.rings.principal_ideal_domain.PrincipalIdealDomain)
False
and this creates problems in FreeModule_generic_pid constructor. I am
working on #9502 and when I tried to switch base call constructor in
FreeModule_submodule_with_basis_pid
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Thanks for this. Btw, I just revived this cython based line profiler:
>
> http://github.com/certik/line_profiler
>
Is Robert K not maintaining the original anymore?
Cheers,
f
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@google
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> Since all the changes are basically user interface changes, I think it
> mostly needs interactive testing. I also think that the major issues
> are design, not whether it does what was intended (I fear my
> intentions may be misinterpretations of
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just solved a relatively easy riddle, and I thought I'd share the results:
>
> # Cython version of cputime():
> cdef extern from "time.h":
> ctypedef unsigned long clock_t
> cdef clock_t clock()
> cdef enum:
>
Since all the changes are basically user interface changes, I think it
mostly needs interactive testing. I also think that the major issues
are design, not whether it does what was intended (I fear my
intentions may be misinterpretations of what people wanted).
I'm not sure what you mean by regr
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
> trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not
> going to see that cephes is broken.
>
> I hacked the package so that it would try to bui
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm
> sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an
> optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage
> now, so although it needs input and
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> I would propose a mercurial patch queue in the spgk root directory.
>> Then sage -pkg simply checks that either all patches in the queue are
>> applied or that there exists an old-style /pa
Hi Jens, Minh and Alex,
thanks a lot for the permission!
ONdrej
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jens Rasch wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> that's fine.
>
> regards
>
> Jens
>
> On 14 July 2010 05:32, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> about a year ago I got a permission from Jens (CCed) who wrote t
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> I would propose a mercurial patch queue in the spgk root directory.
> Then sage -pkg simply checks that either all patches in the queue are
> applied or that there exists an old-style /patches directory and no
> queue.
Since we all seem to lik
Hi Ondrej,
that's fine.
regards
Jens
On 14 July 2010 05:32, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> about a year ago I got a permission from Jens (CCed) who wrote the file:
>
> http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/tip/sage/functions/wigner.py
>
> to use his (original) code in SymPy and license it as
I just had a first look and the most warnings (on startup) arise for the
__cmp__ method, wich seems to be removed in python 3.x
greatz Johannes
Am 15.07.2010 00:06, schrieb Johannes:
> many thanks guys, i'll test it soon and give some feedback about the
> results.
>
> greatz Johannes
> Am 14.07
On 07/14/10 10:58 PM, Nathan Dunfield wrote:
On a similar note cvxopt can make use of glpk as well.
Yes, it can --- I was just using this yesterday.
The trick is that you have to tell cvxopt that glpk is available when
it is compiled/installed. Now that glpk is standard, the install
script f
> Has this
> already been done, or should I file a patch for this?
If you would be so kind... I saw no mention of it until I read your
message :-)
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubsc
Does it work if you install the new version of Jmol? See trac # 9238
(http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9238). I think this broke
when the notebook was put inside an egg. I took that into account
with the new version of Jmol
On Jul 14, 1:15 pm, Volker Braun wrote:
> For the record, Jmo
many thanks guys, i'll test it soon and give some feedback about the
results.
greatz Johannes
Am 14.07.2010 23:55, schrieb Carl Witty:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johannes wrote:
>>
>>> i want to check which part of the sag
> On a similar note cvxopt can make use of glpk as well.
Yes, it can --- I was just using this yesterday.
The trick is that you have to tell cvxopt that glpk is available when
it is compiled/installed. Now that glpk is standard, the install
script for cvxopt should be told to make use of it.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johannes wrote:
>> i want to check which part of the sagecode makes problems when trying to
>> port it to python 3.x. For that, I want want to build it with the '-3'
>> option, but i dont want to edit every sin
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johannes wrote:
> i want to check which part of the sagecode makes problems when trying to
> port it to python 3.x. For that, I want want to build it with the '-3'
> option, but i dont want to edit every single makefile. is the a special
> place to put something li
Hi list,
i want to check which part of the sagecode makes problems when trying to
port it to python 3.x. For that, I want want to build it with the '-3'
option, but i dont want to edit every single makefile. is the a special
place to put something like a global python build parameter?
greatz Johan
Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not going
to see that cephes is broken.
I hacked the package so that it would try to build on any operating system - not
just Cygwin.
Anyway, it has
Hello all,
I just solved a relatively easy riddle, and I thought I'd share the results:
# Cython version of cputime():
cdef extern from "time.h":
ctypedef unsigned long clock_t
cdef clock_t clock()
cdef enum:
CLOCKS_PER_SEC
# To use: #
#
#cdef clock_t start, end
#
Thnank you very much. I have looked at this and unfortunatelly, it
exceeds my knowledges and skills. It would be great if you could
implment this feature. Many many thanks.
Robert
On 13 čnc, 14:57, pang wrote:
> I'd say that's in the sagenb package.
>
> You can use the instructions at:
>
> http:
> I know GPLK was added to Sage recently, and also that R is in Sage. I don't
> know if there is any advantage, but there is a GLPK package for R.
>
> http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glpk/vignettes/glpk-intro.pdf
>
> I don't know if there is any advantage in making that.
>
> I assume it w
For the record, Jmol is also not working from the sage command line
(Fedora 13 x86_64):
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9232
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegro
I'm not aware of any "bugs", but as it has not been tested by many
people other than myself, I'm sure it still needs work. I'm sure it
could be prettier. The issue is that I can't think of a way to test
it other than have people try it.
The only problem I am aware of is the issue I reported with
I know GPLK was added to Sage recently, and also that R is in Sage. I don't know
if there is any advantage, but there is a GLPK package for R.
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glpk/vignettes/glpk-intro.pdf
I don't know if there is any advantage in making that.
I assume it would be fairly
(old phone leads to top-post)
re matplotlib/html5, is the speed affected by number of function sample points?
That seems likely, and something PNGs would not be. So you might need to tune
function sampling (or perhaps post-process and remove visually redundant
points...).
Of course, "adequate"
Hi
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:12:15PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I finally got a chance to test this on a clean 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04
> (lucid) install.
>
> I began by apt-get'ing the icedtea6-plugin, which pulls in a lot of
> other packages such as the OpenJDK version of Java. A simple 3d plot
>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm
> sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an
> optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage
> now, so although it needs input and
I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm
sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an
optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage
now, so although it needs input and work, I would like to argue for
including it, so that we
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 07/13/10 03:51 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2) sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx"
>>>
>>> Andrew Sutherland's Probabilistic Image of Galois Alg
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Maurizio wrote:
> how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
> today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
> which looks like html5 canvas
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9471
>
> Maurizio
>
> On 14 Lug, 1
Hi Ondrej,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> So I wanted to ask, would it be ok with all of you involved that we
> use it in sympy under the BSD license? (We'll leave there the header
> saying who wrote this and that we took it from Sage.)
Fine by me. The main author of fun
On 07/13/10 03:51 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
2) sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx"
Andrew Sutherland's Probabilistic Image of Galois Algorithm
AUTHOR:
- William Stein, 2010-03 -- wrote the Cython wrapper
- Sut
how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
which looks like html5 canvas
Maurizio
On 14 Lug, 10:03, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi
>
> >> Very interesting.
On 07/13/10 03:51 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
2) sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx"
Andrew Sutherland's Probabilistic Image of Galois Algorithm
AUTHOR:
- William Stein, 2010-03 -- wrote the Cython wrapper
- Sut
I will look at it.
John
On 14 July 2010 11:41, Robert Miller wrote:
> Ping!
>
> Would someone familiar with modular symbols care to review this
> ticket? It should be pretty easy...
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9376
>
> --
> Robert L. Miller
> http://www.rlmiller.org/
>
> --
> T
Ping!
Would someone familiar with modular symbols care to review this
ticket? It should be pretty easy...
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9376
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> Hi
>
>>
>> Very interesting.
>>
>> 1. How does the speed of the Sage notebook running locally on your
>> computer compare to Spyder locally on your computer?
>>
>
> I don't think they can be comparable, doing so different functions...
> Anyway I a
Hi
>
> Very interesting.
>
> 1. How does the speed of the Sage notebook running locally on your
> computer compare to Spyder locally on your computer?
>
I don't think they can be comparable, doing so different functions...
Anyway I always use notebook from a server in the local network (which
is
Hi Ondrej,
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:32:32 -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> So I wanted to ask, would it be ok with all of you involved that we
> use it in sympy under the BSD license? (We'll leave there the header
> saying who wrote this and that we took it from Sage.)
I agree with the proposal.
B
44 matches
Mail list logo
