On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Jonathan <gu...@uwosh.edu> wrote: > I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm > sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an > optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage > now, so although it needs input and work, I would like to argue for > including it, so that we can start getting feedback.
If there aren't any regressions, I'd say lets try to get it in sooner rather than later even if it's not totally polished yet. On that note, do you have any good ideas on how we could test this (other than manually?) - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
