On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can
> also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page
> has also been updated accordingly. It took me months to prepare the
> document and get
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:42:15PM +, John Cremona wrote:
> OK, I have just built and started testing 4.3.rc0 on my 32-bit laptop,
> so I'll see if the same happens there, That will be with Sage's own
> gfortran; the test failures were when I built with the system
> fortran.
>
> I'll report
Hi folks,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> I will also give a talk about my thesis project on 11th December 2009,
> Australian time.
I have uploaded some photos [1] taken during my final Honours talk on
Sage. Enjoy.
[1] http://picasaweb.google.com/nguyenminh2/HonoursFina
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Harris Daniels wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Harris Daniels
> Date: Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:58 PM
> Subject: Trouble Compiling from source.
> To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Sage told me to email you for help with an
Hi Jason,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> FYI (Harald?), 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 are in the wrong order on that list.
I think that quirk is due to the script that manages the source
tarball, including generating MD5 checksums. It looks like the script
orders source tarballs acc
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:38:42PM +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:38:01 +0900
> Dan Drake wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 at 10:18AM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> > > Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
> >
> > Builds fine on Ubuntu 9.10 amd64, b
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, VictorMiller
> wrote:
>> Can someone tell me where I can get SAGE sources for old (possibly
>> very old) versions?
>
> See this URL:
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/src-old/
>
FYI (Harald?), 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 are in the wrong o
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> I just tracked down a problem down to a Sage ATLAS miscompile on my CPU;
>> disabling SSE3 did the trick. How do I proceed to fix it permanently and
>
> Did you install a binary or build from source.
Build
Hi Victor,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, VictorMiller wrote:
> Can someone tell me where I can get SAGE sources for old (possibly
> very old) versions?
See this URL:
http://www.sagemath.org/src-old/
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googleg
Can someone tell me where I can get SAGE sources for old (possibly
very old) versions? The reason that I ask is that I've been unable to
build SAGE from sources on my 32 bit redhat system since version 4.
The error that keeps happening is first the following:
*** WARNING: renaming "readline" sinc
2009/12/11 Alex Ghitza :
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:12:48PM +, John Cremona wrote:
>
>> Here are the details of the more interesting ones:
>>
>> File
>> "/home/masgaj/local/sage-4.3.rc0/devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module_element.pyx",
>> line 242:
>> sage: v = vector([float(23.4), int(2
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> I just tracked down a problem down to a Sage ATLAS miscompile on my CPU;
> disabling SSE3 did the trick. How do I proceed to fix it permanently and
Did you install a binary or build from source.
> submit a patch? My /proc/cpuinfo is
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:12:48PM +, John Cremona wrote:
> Here are the details of the more interesting ones:
>
> File
> "/home/masgaj/local/sage-4.3.rc0/devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module_element.pyx",
> line 242:
> sage: v = vector([float(23.4), int(2), complex(2+7*I), long(1)]); v
>
Success -- almost. The build went fine with those env variables set.
But testall gives this:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/constructions/calculus.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/nf_introduction.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/modules/vector_double_dense.pyx"
Dear all,
I opened a few tickets based on the feedback from the first Sage
Education Day in Cambridge, MA. Some are definitely sage-wishlist,
but anyway wanted to point them out. In particular, we really need to
fix a few R things (including finally building with the recommended
ones, though tha
Welcome to the sage-devel forum!
Actually, I think it is rather easy to port Sage to the N900.
Due to the "batteries included" concept Sage uses, Sage is very
porting-friendly.
Maybe end of March, I'll get a N900 for myself. If so, I will
certainly play around with it. One issue is, that (at leas
Sage was compiled on the G1 android phone earlier this year... so, it
is possible ;)
h
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://gro
I just tracked down a problem down to a Sage ATLAS miscompile on my CPU;
disabling SSE3 did the trick. How do I proceed to fix it permanently and
submit a patch? My /proc/cpuinfo is below.
The strange thing is that /proc/cpuinfo doesn't contain SSE3, but still
ATLAS didn't crash, in fact it wou
>
> and put your code in there, make a ticket, and a patch. I think Sage
> has been sorely lacking dynamical systems code for a long time.
> With the above little bit of infrastructure, other people could add,
> e.g., the Mandelbrot set, etc. (I know Tom Boothby has some super fast
> cython c
> (In fact I'd wish for a convention that all matrix factorizations
> returned immutable matrices by default, since the factorizations are
> cached and one doesn't typically change them before using them.)
I think I wrote some (trivial!) Cholesky decomposition code, and not
making the factorizat
I plan to purchase a nokia n900, and thought that it would be great to
run sage in it. I imagine that porting such a big collection of
software that deppends on such a variety of languages and libraries
would be extremelly hard, but anyways i thought it would be worth
asking to experts: do you thin
Thanks -- I have set SAGE_FORTRAN and SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB like this:
export SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB=/usr/lib/libgfortran.so.3
export SAGE_FORTRAN=/usr/bin/gfortran
and am rebuilding from scratch. I'll post here how I get on.
John
2009/12/11 William Stein :
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Tim Joseph D
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jaap Spieswrote:
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Mike Hansen wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source
Its not much, but I have a little bit of stuff on the interact wiki:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact/dynsys
If I ever teach dynamical systems again I'll generate a lot more.
-Marshall
On Dec 11, 10:37 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Harald Schilly
>
> wrote:
> >
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jaap Spieswrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> (1) Ther
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> ... and inspired by that I plotted the logistic fractal for that ;)
> http://sagenb.org/pub/1240/
Harald,
Any chance you could do the following:
(1) cd devel/sage/sage/
(2) mkdir dynamics
(3) cd dynamics
(4) emacs fractals.py
and
... and inspired by that I plotted the logistic fractal for that ;)
http://sagenb.org/pub/1240/
h
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>>
>> You will want to replace /local/jec/sage-4.3.rc0/local/
>> lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libgcc_s.so.1 with your local version
>> of libgcc_s.so. Alternatively, you
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> You will want to replace /local/jec/sage-4.3.rc0/local/
> lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libgcc_s.so.1 with your local version
> of libgcc_s.so. Alternatively, you can set $SAGE_FORTRAN and
> $SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB to your system's fortr
You will want to replace /local/jec/sage-4.3.rc0/local/
lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libgcc_s.so.1 with your local version of
libgcc_s.so. Alternatively, you can set $SAGE_FORTRAN and $SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB
to your system's fortran compiler and library. This is caused by the fortran
spkg building
> I strongly disagree. For any object foo in Sage, latex(foo) is
> supposed to produce a version of foo that is suitable for typesetting
> within a mathematics environment. For a string, the right thing to
> do is use texttt.
Ok, I understand. So maybe you have a different and better solution
f
I reported this before, hoping for some help from a build guru, with
no success, so I'll try again.
My desktop machine was upgraded over the summer (it's an official
university-supported version of Suse:
cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.27.37-0.1-pae (ge...@buildhost) (gcc version 4.3.2
[gcc-4_
Yes, I've seen it before. Don't use the FFT multiplication routines in
it for integer computations that require proven results. He uses a
real FFT subject to roundoff error, with a sum of digits test, which
is not proven. There is an option to switch to NTT's which are 4 times
slower, but these are
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>>> Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
> [...]
>
>>>
>>
>> (1) There are no problems (except the one Bu
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote:
> This is weird. Occassionaly, in the SAGE notebook, version 4.2.1, the
> last characters of output after evaluating a cell are supressed. I've
> tried all of string.printable: the only characters supressed are "S",
> "A", "G", "E" and "_". No
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Mike Hansen wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
[...]
>>
>
> (1) There are no problems (except the one Burcin posted a fix for
> above) on Fedora 11 64-bit.
>
> (2) You s
This is weird. Occassionaly, in the SAGE notebook, version 4.2.1, the
last characters of output after evaluating a cell are supressed. I've
tried all of string.printable: the only characters supressed are "S",
"A", "G", "E" and "_". No kidding.
A related issue is that the starting whitespace is
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:57 AM, slabbe wrote:
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> Is there a reason why str are wrapped in \texttt for the latex output?
>
> sage: latex('abcde')
> \texttt{abcde}
>
> Moreover, underscores are changed to \_ :
>
> sage: latex('t_i=4^i')
> \texttt{t\_i=4^i}
>
> Personally, I don'
Hi folks,
Here's a blog post [1] by Mike Croucher on using Sage to visualize and
study the discrete logistic equation.
[1] http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=2006
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, s
Dear sage-devel,
Is there a reason why str are wrapped in \texttt for the latex output?
sage: latex('abcde')
\texttt{abcde}
Moreover, underscores are changed to \_ :
sage: latex('t_i=4^i')
\texttt{t\_i=4^i}
Personally, I don't like it and I wrote a patch that makes latex
behave like identity o
A protected name... I see :-)
Thank you !!!
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
UR
Hi Nathann,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:46:31 +0100
Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello everybody !!!
>
> I just met what I believe is a Sage bug if not a misuse of it from my
> behalf, and I have no idea of how to create the corresponding ticket,
> symbolics not being my field in any way. besides, I produ
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3/rc0/sage-4.3.rc0.tar
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3/rc0/sa
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Simon King wrote:
> On 10 Dez., 23:15, William Stein wrote:
> [...]
> > __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ f := x < y
> >
> > > f*(-3)
> > > ;
> >
> > __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ -3 y < -3 x
> >
> > > f*z;
> >
> > __
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3/rc0/sage-4.3.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3/rc0/sage-4.3.rc0-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
>
O
On an intel mac running 10.4.11, I got those two, plus:
**
File "/Volumes/E/sage-4.3.rc0/devel/sage/sage/rings/
complex_double.pyx", line 2046:
sage: z^2 - z + 1
Expected:
-4.4408920985e-16
Got:
-2.22044604925e-16 - 2.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Adam Webb wrote:
> Just for information, here are some other multiple packages. I would
> guess that the newer versions of glpk and pexpect in experimental are
> tests. Others seem to be older versions that were left behind after
> promotion of the package.
>
> st
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:38:01 +0900
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 at 10:18AM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> > Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
>
> Builds fine on Ubuntu 9.10 amd64, but I have a couple doctest
> failures, both of which seem like harmless changes t
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Anytime after I build Sage, I can come along and run the doctests with
> "make test" or whatever. But what if I built from source and later want
> to run all the spkg-checks? Right now, I need to rebuild *everything*
> from scratch with SAGE_CHEC
Hello everybody !!!
I just met what I believe is a Sage bug if not a misuse of it from my
behalf, and I have no idea of how to create the corresponding ticket,
symbolics not being my field in any way. besides, I produced this bug
using the sage version with is installed in sage.math ( recompiling
Does this mean that no more patches will be merged except for bug
fixes? #6887 just got a positive review..
John
2009/12/11 Dan Drake :
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 at 10:18AM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
>>
>> http://sage.math.wa
Anytime after I build Sage, I can come along and run the doctests with
"make test" or whatever. But what if I built from source and later want
to run all the spkg-checks? Right now, I need to rebuild *everything*
from scratch with SAGE_CHECK=yes, but it would be useful to be able to
run the spkg-ch
53 matches
Mail list logo
