[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Rob Beezer
I've published two editions of my linear algebra text through Lulu.com. The quality has been very good for the price. The coilbound versions are especially nice, since they lie flat, while a 700-page softcover with a "perfect binding" seems a bit unwieldy. Generally I've been happy. I include a

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: > > > On Sep 14, 6:51 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the >>> maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's >>> maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am curious about anyone's experience with lulu.com. Does anyone >> purchased the sphinx Sage tutorial printed at lulu.com: >> >> http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/sage-tutorial/5375513 >> >> ? Doe

[sage-devel] Re: Big feature on open-source in Engineering and Technology 12-25th Sept.

2009-09-14 Thread Dan Drake
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 at 12:08AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > There's a magazine every couple of weeks, which is one of the benefits. > > The 12-25th September issue > > http://kn.theiet.org/magazine/issues/0915/index.cfm > > has a whole lot on open-source. The front cover shows a picture of a

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread kcrisman
On Sep 14, 6:51 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the > > maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's > > maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because w

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread David Joyner
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, David Joyner wrote: >> >> I don't know about lulu but I do have experience with createspace.com >> (which is similar I think but the only "vanity press" amazon accepts). >> Let me know if you want more det

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Tim, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:21 PM, TimDaly wrote: > > I published my Axiom book on Lulu. > Absolutely minimum hassle. > I uploaded a PDF and some cover artwork, ordered a copy and it > arrived. > I purchased the ISBN number which makes it somewhat harder to change > but implies that Amazon

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Jason Grout
Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious about anyone's experience with lulu.com. Does anyone > purchased the sphinx Sage tutorial printed at lulu.com: > > http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/sage-tutorial/5375513 > > ? Does it look good? I guess it will be black & white when printed,

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread TimDaly
I published my Axiom book on Lulu. Absolutely minimum hassle. I uploaded a PDF and some cover artwork, ordered a copy and it arrived. I purchased the ISBN number which makes it somewhat harder to change but implies that Amazon will carry the book. I priced the book about $1 over the minimum cost,

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, David Joyner wrote: > > I don't know about lulu but I do have experience with createspace.com > (which is similar I think but the only "vanity press" amazon accepts). > Let me know if you want more details. Yes, I am interested. Does it mean that amazon can also

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Marshall Hampton
Printing the color-highlighted docs in B&W doesn't work very well. Its legible, but the lighter colors come out faint and hard to read. You can replace the PDF fairly easily. If you buy 25 or more copies, the price per copy falls a lot. Apart from the color-highlighting issue, I have been impre

[sage-devel] Re: experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread David Joyner
I don't know about lulu but I do have experience with createspace.com (which is similar I think but the only "vanity press" amazon accepts). Let me know if you want more details. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > Hi, > > I am curious about anyone's experience with lulu.co

[sage-devel] Re: Improving QQ['x']

2009-09-14 Thread Nils Bruin
On Sep 14, 3:47 pm, Sebastian Pancratz wrote: > 1. > > Given rational polynomials a and b, what should gcd(a,b) return?  The > problem arises since the gcd is only defined up to rational units.  I > think the two sound options are either the monic normalisation, or a I think any mathematician wo

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2009/9/14 Jason Grout : > > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >>   Hi, >> >>   In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the >> maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's >> maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the >> cell:

[sage-devel] experience with lulu

2009-09-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I am curious about anyone's experience with lulu.com. Does anyone purchased the sphinx Sage tutorial printed at lulu.com: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/sage-tutorial/5375513 ? Does it look good? I guess it will be black & white when printed, do the examples and section headers

[sage-devel] Big feature on open-source in Engineering and Technology 12-25th Sept.

2009-09-14 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I'm a member of the Institute of Engineering and Technology http://www.theiet.org/ which was created from the old Institute of Electrical Engineers (IEE) in the UK, along with the Institute of Mechanical Engineers (or something like that anyway). There's a magazine every couple of weeks, whic

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Jason Grout
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the > maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's > maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the > cell: > > A.eigenvectors() > > maxim

[sage-devel] Re: Improving QQ['x']

2009-09-14 Thread Sebastian Pancratz
Dear all, The implementation of QQ[] using FLINT is making lots of progress and it seems as if everything should be *much* faster than it is now. At the moment, I've got two questions. First one is about the design of the gcd method, and possibly affects other rings too. The second method is p

[sage-devel] Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Hi, In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the cell: A.eigenvectors() maxima 5.16.3 returns: [[[0,4],[3,1]],[1,0,0,-4],[0,1,0,-2],[0,

[sage-devel] Re: notebook: tip of the day -- running a server on a remote machine using ssh tunneling

2009-09-14 Thread Nils Bruin
On Sep 13, 2:38 pm, William Stein wrote: > > This tip should be fleshed out and included somewhere in the release > > management wiki page at > > >http://wiki.sagemath.org/release > > > I feel ashamed to admit that I'm not able to do this fleshing out work > > as I hardly use the notebook. > > I'

[sage-devel] Re: Standard Sage Components (was Re: Solaris - what do we expect?)

2009-09-14 Thread Tom Boothby
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: >>> If the spkg fixes this problem and doesn't make things *worse* on >>> Solaris, it absolutely  should get a positive review.  Note that the >>> assuming "CC=gcc" was already in

[sage-devel] Re: Standard Sage Components (was Re: Solaris - what do we expect?)

2009-09-14 Thread Jason Grout
David Joyner wrote: > The optional package is pil-1.1.6, which is the current version according to > http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/. There is a simpler interface to pil > at > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6741 (which I wrote this summer and > possibly Jason might review at