Hi
I did sage -docbuild all html to provide local
documentation on each of 100 PCs on which I image
from a central server. It is a nice way to provide
a lab in a low-bandwidth environment with
sage and sage docs locally.
The docs are viewed via a browser to
file:usr/local/src/sage-3.4/dev
Hi,
I have a question about how to name the Sage derived distribution that
I am doing.
Originally I thought I would just use it for one of my projects, but
then i realized that in fact I want to use it for all my projects.
So I will call it probably Source Python Distribution (SPD) and it will
See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5500
On Mar 17, 2009, at 1:01 AM, chandra wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 1:47 am, William Stein wrote:
>
>> I think simply appending a text file of changes to this list would be
>> fine for starters.
>>
>> William
>
> OK. Here is my list so far:
>
> Su
On Mar 18, 8:37 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
> You need the development part of tcl/tk. In Ubuntu you should do
> something like apt-get install tk8.4-dev or so. I don't remember
> exactly (I'm not on Ubuntu right now).
>
> Note those packages are experimental!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jaap
I followed sequen
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:28 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> This is a very interesting idea, and I think I can do it for ZZ,
> QQbar, etc., but I don't know how to deal with GF(p). That is, in
> docstrings, you presumably want GF(p) to appear as is, while to
> evaluate latex(GF(p)), indeed to eval
On Mar 18, 1:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jason Grout
>
> wrote:
>
> > John H Palmieri wrote:
> >> On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
>
> >> In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, b
Hi Minh,
a patch for this is up for review at trac #5563. Thanks for reporting
it.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegrou
Hi Minh,
a patch for this is up for review at trac #5563. Thanks for reporting
it.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegrou
On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Golam,
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossain
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Firstly, let me thank you for this wonderful
>> effort. I have been using Sage for last six months
>> almost exclusively and I must say that I am r
On 13 Mrz., 01:24, dmharvey wrote:
> --
> | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 |
> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
> ---
Hi Golam,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossain
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Firstly, let me thank you for this wonderful
> effort. I have been using Sage for last six months
> almost exclusively and I must say that I am really
> impressed by Sage.
>
> While computing the following i
Hi All,
Firstly, let me thank you for this wonderful
effort. I have been using Sage for last six months
almost exclusively and I must say that I am really
impressed by Sage.
While computing the following inverse Laplace
transform, I get a mysterious error.
--
Dear William,
> Why not have some special shortcut so that we can typeset any ring
> using Sage itself. E.g.,
> in answer to your question "what should CDF" typeset as, I answer
>
> sage: latex(CDF)
>
> Then we can argue about what latex(CDF) should be in Sage instead...
> Building the d
Hi Clint,
Any thoughts? Feel free to just say "argh, not enough info" or
"upgrade to 3.9!", which is probably what I would do.
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Cremona
Date: Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:21 AM
Subject: [sage-devel] 3.4 build failure
To: SAGE devel
The old probl
2009/3/18 William Stein :
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> John H Palmieri wrote:
>>> On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht
>>> wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
>>
> New page since a couple of days:
> http://sagemath.org/tour-graphics.html ... I want to expand this
> (double or more) .. any ideas? If so, please send me the code and a
> short description. What's especially missing is 3d stuff, diff
> equations, vector fields or just "combinatorial"/"coding th
On Mar 18, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>
> Hmmph,
>
> just having sent my post an re-reading it, the ..."usr/local/bin/"...
> in my PATH suddenly seems not to be so innocent as I had thought.
> Thank again for pointing this out to me.
Good catch :-}
I think the rule is that if you
Hmmph,
just having sent my post an re-reading it, the ..."usr/local/bin/"...
in my PATH suddenly seems not to be so innocent as I had thought.
Thank again for pointing this out to me.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-dev
On 17 Mrz., 23:59, Justin Walker wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry to hear this.
>
> > What exactly is that "libintl.3.dylib" problem you mention about?
>
> I've lost track of the beginning of this thread, but if I understand
> things correctly, the p
Hey all, long time since my last update about activities from the
website. That's mainly because not much has happened. There was a
valley during Christmas holidays and only a couple of new referring
sites that brought traffic. The most comes still from google, then
sites like stumbleupon, reddit
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> After I made the (now hotly-debated :-) enhancement to the
> misnamed/misplaced Polynomial.is_primitive method, my next performance
> bottleneck was the very clean implementation of the Berlekamp-Massey
> algorithm in sage/matrix/berlekamp_massey.py
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> John H Palmieri wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht
>> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
>> about CDF: Carl had good questions abo
I tried to create a rewrite rule (that would have solved this by
telling everyone a "301" error and the new url) but I give up. I'll
never understand apache ... :\
you can't tell them directly, there is something called webmaster
central and i use sitemaps.org to tell them about the update
frequen
I think that $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ is now pretty universal, and the old
"Galois Field" GF seem a bit old-fashioned -- mathematical notation
prefers single letters, perhaps in fancy fonts, while computer
languages prefer longer names with fonts!
So I would be happy for the command \GF{p} to look like
$
On Mar 18, 11:47 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> John H Palmieri wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht
> > wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
>
> > In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
> > about CDF: Carl had good questions about it, and
John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
>
> In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
> about CDF: Carl had good questions about it, and besides, it's not
> standard mathematical notation.
On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
about CDF: Carl had good questions about it, and besides, it's not
standard mathematical notation. I don't know which other ones from
Harald et al.,
Using search on the main page leads to lots of references under
www.sagemath.org/doc/ref
but now that is
www.sagemath.org/doc/reference
Basically anything under the old "node" style is broken, which is a
lot, unfortunately also in outside refs - but for now in the Google
searches.
After I made the (now hotly-debated :-) enhancement to the
misnamed/misplaced Polynomial.is_primitive method, my next performance
bottleneck was the very clean implementation of the Berlekamp-Massey
algorithm in sage/matrix/berlekamp_massey.py. I noticed that NTL has an
implementation of this
2009/3/18 Ryan Hinton :
>
> The is_primitive issues is now described in trac #5561. Owners are welcome!
And I have rebased (and slightly improved) #5140, so reviewers are
welcome there too. [Ryan, we do not bother too much about ownership
of tickets, but reviewers are crucial. I hope to review
The is_primitive issues is now described in trac #5561. Owners are welcome!
John Cremona wrote:
> I hope I did not offend anyone, least of all someone who had provided
> a patch which makes a useful efficiency improvement! But as Martin
> invited all sage-devel to look at that code, I did!
>
>
Very good. Thank you for taking a look at the code -- and no offense
taken: I just didn't know what to do next!
I will leave the is_irreducible() bug/definition for #5140 and create a
new ticket for is_primitive including the comments from John and
C.Witty. I'll leave it unassigned for now.
PS I found that #5140 already addresses related issues, and contains a
patch by me for the is_irreducible() bug. the patch needs review, and
that explains why (1) I remembered already fixing it and (2) why it is
not fixed.
I will rebase that patch to 3.4 and then invite reviewers.
John
2009/3/
I hope I did not offend anyone, least of all someone who had provided
a patch which makes a useful efficiency improvement! But as Martin
invited all sage-devel to look at that code, I did!
I'll be happy to provide a patch for the bug in is_irreducible for
rational polys. (I call it a bug, thoug
Unfortunately, I don't know what on earth is_primitive() is doing there.
I didn't put it there. I wrote the patch to as a performance
enhancement to the _existing_ is_primitive implementation. is_primitive
was there already, so the current ticket is probably not the best place
to discuss
Stan Schymanski wrote:
> To delete a whole section of the notebook, I type in something like
> "#begin deletion" in the first cell and something like "#end deletion"
> in the last cell, evaluate both, then click on the "Edit" button (upper
> right corner of the notebook), and delete all the t
Dear John,
> > May I suggest to put all these tips and tricks in a single place instead
> > of
> > spreading them through the mailing list and irc. The best tool for this is
> > certainly the wiki. I started such a page on
> >
> >http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/HelpOnTheDoc
> >
> >
Here is what I do:
To delete a single cell, I delete all the contents, then press backspace
once more and the cell is gone. For an html cell created by
option-clicking, I delete all the contents and then do a shift-enter.
To delete a whole section of the notebook, I type in something like
"#b
JLeo wrote:
[...]
> ActiveState Tcl) and set the appropriate variables (TK_INCLUDE_PATH,
> TK_LIBRARY, TK_WISH) or disable VTK_USE_TK.
> Call Stack (most recent call first):
> CMakeLists.txt:831 (INCLUDE)
>
>
> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
> Error configuring VTK
>
> real
How to delete useless cell on the notebook? The empty cell form takes alot
of space.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
2009/3/18 Florent Hivert :
>
> Dear All,
>
> May I suggest to put all these tips and tricks in a single place instead of
> spreading them through the mailing list and irc. The best tool for this is
> certainly the wiki. I started such a page on
>
>http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/HelpO
Dear All,
May I suggest to put all these tips and tricks in a single place instead of
spreading them through the mailing list and irc. The best tool for this is
certainly the wiki. I started such a page on
http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/HelpOnTheDoc
Right now it is rather small
2009/3/18 Carl Witty :
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:35 AM, John Cremona
>> Therefore (if I am right) there needs to be a planned procedure for
>> completing the ReSTification of Sage. For a start, is there anywhere
>> a list showing which files have not yet been converted?
>
> You can generate
2009/3/18 Simon King :
>
> Hi!
>
> On Mar 18, 1:35 pm, John Cremona wrote:
>> I assume that all sage source files which have not yet been converted
>> to the new ReST format should go through that process, ...
>
> Can someone please point me to a reference explaining the ReST format?
http://docu
Hi!
On Mar 18, 1:35 pm, John Cremona wrote:
> I assume that all sage source files which have not yet been converted
> to the new ReST format should go through that process, ...
Can someone please point me to a reference explaining the ReST format?
Cheers,
Simon
--~--~-~--~~--
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:35 AM, John Cremona
> Therefore (if I am right) there needs to be a planned procedure for
> completing the ReSTification of Sage. For a start, is there anywhere
> a list showing which files have not yet been converted?
You can generate such a list for yourself, using
I assume that all sage source files which have not yet been converted
to the new ReST format should go through that process, and soon, for
the following reasons at least:
(1) Sage currently has two different conventions for docstring format
simultaneously, which is stupid and offputting to new co
Hi Mike Hansen (cc: sage-devel),
I am getting a lot of complaints about docstrings not being allowed to
use $$'s instead of -- or as a synonym for ticks for math mode.
Thoughts? I would *love* to also allow dollar signs. Not allowing
them just messes with people's training so much.
William
--
The old problem with Atlas failing to build on Bill Hart's machine is
still with us:
The machine was otherwise idle during the relevant period.
Failed to build ATLAS.
ATLAS failed to build for the 1-th time, possibly because of a
loaded system, so we will automatically try again up to 4 more tim
On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:41 PM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
> > On Mar 17, 12:03 pm, Carl Witty wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, John H Palmieri
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Well, I've been trying to modify 'latex_preamble' in sage/doc/commo
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:29 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> after more delay than hoped for here goes the final 3.4. Sources are
> available from
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/src/
The 3.4 source distro builds fine under x86 Debian 5.0 (testing) with
the following architecture:
*** Beg
51 matches
Mail list logo
