On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht <m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
about CDF: Carl had good questions about it, and besides, it's not
standard mathematical notation. I don't know which other ones from
rings/all.py you had in mind.
> How about e.g. \GF{p,n} and \GF{p} I use those a lot.
>
> Martin
We could have \GF, and then you could do \GF(p) and \GF(p^n), but how
should GF be typeset? If it's something like
\DeclareMathOperator{\GF}{GF}
then a macro makes sense. If it's essentially indistinguishable from
'GF' in math mode, then I say we don't include it. What did you have
in mind?
John
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
