John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 18, 1:53 am, Martin Albrecht <m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, William Stein wrote:
>
> In response to William, I think \QQbar makes sense, but I'm not sure
> about CDF: Carl had good questions about it, and besides, it's not
> standard mathematical notation. I don't know which other ones from
> rings/all.py you had in mind.
>
>> How about e.g. \GF{p,n} and \GF{p} I use those a lot.
>>
>> Martin
>
> We could have \GF, and then you could do \GF(p) and \GF(p^n), but how
> should GF be typeset? If it's something like
>
> \DeclareMathOperator{\GF}{GF}
>
> then a macro makes sense. If it's essentially indistinguishable from
> 'GF' in math mode, then I say we don't include it. What did you have
> in mind?
I believe I've seen it as $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ or $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ lots of
times.
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
