On Jan 11, 9:09 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
Hi,
> I'm trying to put together a better version of the SageTeX spkg and have
> written a spkg-check script. I do have some questions, though:
>
> * Is there a command line switch corresponding to SAGE_CHECK? (See
> ticket 299 [1]). In that ticket,
I'm trying to put together a better version of the SageTeX spkg and have
written a spkg-check script. I do have some questions, though:
* Is there a command line switch corresponding to SAGE_CHECK? (See
ticket 299 [1]). In that ticket, mabshoff suggests that "-t" run
spkg-check, but it d
Hi,
I'm convinced this is a javascript issue. When developing pages
that include Jmol I use the special package of Jmol specific
javascript functions included in the jmol.js file included with Jmol,
because each browser has some quirks. As best I can tell this package
is not being used by the
Dear sage sages,
I've been investigating sage for possible use in an upper-level
chemistry course. Primarily this semeser I may try to use it for
chemical kinetics (systems of differential equations, often called
rate laws). Over the holidays, I wrote some simple routines that
parse chemical
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:00 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 11, 5:52 pm, "David Joyner" wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>> > I put a pdf of the presentation here, since I think it's not pointless
>> > to look at that. Of course, none of the a
On Jan 11, 5:52 pm, "David Joyner" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi David,
> > I put a pdf of the presentation here, since I think it's not pointless
> > to look at that. Of course, none of the animations work with the pdf:
>
> >http://sage.math.washington.e
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mhampton wrote:
>>
>> OK, I added a tar file of the directory in my home folder.
>>
>> -M. Hampton
>
> It looks very amazing with all the animations. Wow. I wish Sage more
> natively supported
> using ta
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mhampton wrote:
>
> OK, I added a tar file of the directory in my home folder.
>
> -M. Hampton
It looks very amazing with all the animations. Wow. I wish Sage more
natively supported
using tachyon to create animations like that.
I put a pdf of the presentation
OK, I added a tar file of the directory in my home folder.
-M. Hampton
On Jan 11, 6:26 pm, "Timothy Clemans"
wrote:
> I'm on a Mac, but when I click the link I just see a bunch of a files.
> Could you post a tar file?
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, mhampton wrote:
>
> > My presentation w
I do look forward for a solaris binary. Thanks for all the work.
-Adrian
On Jan 11, 4:25 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> Hi, some more updates:
>
> * I fixed the sympow build on Solaris/x86 and now I get all those
> doctests to pass
> * The Singular pexpect interface hang now has a workaround, that d
I'm on a Mac, but when I click the link I just see a bunch of a files.
Could you post a tar file?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, mhampton wrote:
>
> My presentation was done in Keynote, and it would be pretty pointless
> to look at a pdf. I did put the Keynote folder up at:
>
> http://sage.ma
Hi, some more updates:
* I fixed the sympow build on Solaris/x86 and now I get all those
doctests to pass
* The Singular pexpect interface hang now has a workaround, that does
impact performance to some extend, but it is better than hangs. The
fix can be made Solaris specific until we sort thin
My presentation was done in Keynote, and it would be pretty pointless
to look at a pdf. I did put the Keynote folder up at:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/ams2009mhampton.key/
(On OS.X this folder will appear as a file.) If you don't have
Keynote, you can still individually look
see http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt/browse_thread/thread/f4354f1624eff3bc
On Jan 11, 7:24 pm, David Møller Hansen
wrote:
> I will restart this thread in sage-nt.
>
> /David
>
> On Jan 11, 7:13 pm, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> > I am interested in this. Might I suggest that sage-nt would be
I will restart this thread in sage-nt.
/David
On Jan 11, 7:13 pm, "John Cremona" wrote:
> I am interested in this. Might I suggest that sage-nt would be a better
> forum?
>
> Apart from the things you picked up on, there was also some code
> written by Nadia who spoke at the Sage Days in Nanc
>From the discussion in thread
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b1498200416eee7e/27b3dd7a245c5a35?q=pairing&lnk=ol&;
Pairing function should be placed on a point as in Magma.
I will use the Miller algorithm to compute the functions needed to
compute the Weil pairing
I am interested in this. Might I suggest that sage-nt would be a better forum?
Apart from the things you picked up on, there was also some code
written by Nadia who spoke at the Sage Days in Nancy. I'm not sure if
she posted that on sage-* but I think it is on trac. Must run,
John Cremona
20
This is a call out to the people who is interested in getting pairings
on elliptic curves into Sage.
I have started a Ticket #4964 on getting a pairing framework into
Sage.
Currently I am trying to get an overview of what activity there is on
this in Sage.
I've browsed the TRAC server and this
Hi,
On Jan 10, 11:13 am, "Luiz Felipe Martins"
wrote:
> Hi. The software you mention may remain nameless, but it is pretty
> obvious what it is.
Yeah, I was aiming more for obnoxious than subtle. :-)
> There was a serious screw up when they tried to
> redo their whole interface in Java, as I w
19 matches
Mail list logo
