I do look forward for a solaris binary. Thanks for all the work. -Adrian
On Jan 11, 4:25 pm, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, some more updates: > > * I fixed the sympow build on Solaris/x86 and now I get all those > doctests to pass > * The Singular pexpect interface hang now has a workaround, that does > impact performance to some extend, but it is better than hangs. The > fix can be made Solaris specific until we sort things out > * A whole bunch of small doctest failures got fixed. > * I tracked down one issue that is caused by pow() behaving > differently than on Solaris when computing pow of negative values. > > But there are at least two more open issues: > > * symmetrica seems to have some interface issues. I managed to do > some of the examples that fail from Sage via symmetrica in C and those > seem to work. More work is being done here > * numpy/scipy: both of them (for both trunk as well as what we shit) > segfault for certain input and this is probably due to some bug in > between numpy/scipy, gcc/gfortran 4.2.4 and ATLAS. Not sure what to do > here yet, but at least for numpy building without an external BLAS > fixes the issues. Scipy seems to be mostly affected by specfun, i.e. > its special functions Fortran library. > > Most of the above fixes as well as some other updates should make it > into the next Sage release when I will do Sparc as well as x86 > binaries. > > Cheers, > > Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
