I created a trac ticket for this code.
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1562
On Dec 18, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> I'm trying to define inverse csc, sec, and cot and their hyperbolic
>> versions. I dug through
>> $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sa
Is this working as intended?
The first statement should return the same as the second, and the
third statemnt is ok.
sage: solve([3==3, 1.00*x^3 == 0], x)
[]
sage: solve([1.00*x^3 == 0], x)
[x == 0]
sage: solve([1==3, 1.00*x^3 == 0], x)
[]
--~--~-~--~
On Dec 18, 2007 10:20 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:02 AM, William Stein wrote:
> >
> >> On Dec 14, 2007 9:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
>
> This seems like some nice documen
On Dec 14, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:02 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2007 9:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
This seems like some nice documentation on the primitives:
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/
It
Hi folks,
I've started working on a new C library called "zn_poly", which does
polynomial arithmetic in (Z/nZ)[x], where n fits into an unsigned
long. Similar to NTL's zz_pX class. This might eventually be part of
FLINT, but for now it's a separate project.
I am maintaining a website for z
While we're talking about the wiki...
It would be nice to clean up the FAQ and add sections, and hyperlinks to
individual FAQ entries. This will work nicely if we can add page
anchors...but I can't figure out how to do it. MoinMoin says it can add
them [1] but I couldn't get it to work on the Sage
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1
(probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be
els
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1
>>> (probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be
>>> elsewhere).
>>>
>> How would you propose handling the cas
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1
>> (probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be
>> elsewhere).
>>
>
> How would you propose handling the case "x subscript n" (i.e., $x_n$)
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1
> (probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be elsewhere).
>
How would you propose handling the case "x subscript n" (i.e., $x_n$)?
-Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1
(probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be elsewhere).
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
>
> http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1441
>
> I agree that the observed symptom is not desirable,
I've added this as a trac ticket.
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1562
On Dec 18, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> I'm trying to define inverse csc, sec, and cot and their hyperbolic
>> versions. I dug through
>> $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-ma
On Dec 19, 1:42 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
> >http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> > This is a *major* new release, with a huge number of
Michael,
That's good to hear. If I notice anything else awry while playing around in
sage, I'll be sure to post it here.
Jeremy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EM
On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> This is a *major* new release, with a huge number of tickets
> closed, and the additional of both R and the ATLAS BLAS
> as standard
I am definitely extremely interested. I'll be able to play around with
it Friday,
but probly not much before that.
On Dec 18, 2007 5:55 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> since the FAQ seems to get added content on a regular basis now it
> might be a good idea to include it in
Hello Jeremy,
> I will add your workaround to the FAQ.
I added the issue to the FAQ and updated the info on #1495.
Technically the issue you reported was #1495 and not #1497, but it was
close ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, se
Hello,
since the FAQ seems to get added content on a regular basis now it
might be a good idea to include it into the official documentation.
While looking for something else moinmoin wiki related I came across a
latex export plugin, see
http://moinmo.in/FormatterMarket/text_latex.py
It looks l
Half way up page two in Australia. So in the rankings that really
count we still have a way to go. ;-)
Bill.
On 18 Dec, 18:00, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, that's amazing. Just two or three days ago I checked and it was about
> #5!
> That progress is looking good to dis
On Dec 18, 10:56 pm, shortname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To all,
Hello Jeremy,
> Just thought you might like to know, ATLAS fails to build on Ubuntu
> 7.10 "Gutsy" with power management enabled.
>
> The workaround for FC7 works in Ubuntu as well. Disabling "Power
> Manager" via
>
> System -
To all,
Just thought you might like to know, ATLAS fails to build on Ubuntu
7.10 "Gutsy" with power management enabled.
The workaround for FC7 works in Ubuntu as well. Disabling "Power
Manager" via
System --> Preferences --> Sessions
under the "Startup Programs" tab makes the build run smoothl
OK, so the valgrind issues in that log are all in qsieve::member
functions, and those are fixed by what I sent you.
But the errors in what's listed in trac#1402 are in a different place
in my code, despite being called from roughly the same point in the
mwrank run.
The actual effect on the progr
Hello John,
I don't know if this is helpful, but on sage.math get the following
happens when running mwrank under valgrind with the curve from ticket
1402.
The issue goes away after I applied your initialization patch you send
me per email. The valgrind log is somewhat different from the one in
On Dec 18, 10:00 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
> I'm not sure mabshoff and I are syncronised on this. I have fixed the
> issues in #1403 in my code and am making sure that he has those too,
> since they did not get into 2.9. As for #1402, I cannot reproduce
> that on m
I'm not sure mabshoff and I are syncronised on this. I have fixed the
issues in #1403 in my code and am making sure that he has those too,
since they did not get into 2.9. As for #1402, I cannot reproduce
that on my machines so have not fixed it. I *did* fix a different
memory problem which cas
On Dec 18, 9:28 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:00 , John Cremona wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18/12/2007, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>
> >>> Hello,
>
> >>> Sage 2.9 has been released.
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:00 , John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2007, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>>>
>>>http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
On 18/12/2007, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
> >
> >http://sagemath.org/download.html
> >
> > This is a *major* new release, with a huge number o
On Dec 18, 8:17 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
> >http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> > This is a *major* new release, with a huge number of
On Dec 16, 2007, at 08:04 , William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sage 2.9 has been released. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> This is a *major* new release, with a huge number of tickets
> closed, and the additional of both R and the ATLAS BLAS
> as standard
When someone gets around to writing an installer for SAGE in OS X,
this is something that can be tried there.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Wow, that's amazing. Just two or three days ago I checked and it was about #5!
That progress is looking good to displace sagepub.com soon!
--
Joel
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:48:21AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> On Irc I noticed:
>
> 02:27 < ondrej> hi mabshoff - sage
Hi
First on page two in South Africa.
Jan
--
.~.
/V\ Jan Groenewald
/( )\www.aims.ac.za
^^-^^
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Dec 18, 7:59 am, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1418
>
> The optional doc-tests have me confused for this bug. The doc-tests in
> sage/interfaces/magma.py don't fail on my PC but I don't have magma installed.
> However, the patch there ad
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> On Irc I noticed:
>
> 02:27 < ondrej> hi mabshoff - sage is second in my google search in Prague.
> :)
>
> So in the US I just did a Google search for "sage", and
> our Sage math software project is now number 2 in
> google sear
In the UK it only creeps in at the bottom of page 2, thanks to a large
concert and event venue in the north of England of the same name (The
Sage, Gateshead) and our evident great interest in a small evergreen
shrub. And more...
John
On 18/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> H
Hi Sage-Devel,
On Irc I noticed:
02:27 < ondrej> hi mabshoff - sage is second in my google search in Prague. :)
So in the US I just did a Google search for "sage", and
our Sage math software project is now number 2 in
google searches.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mat
A post about Sage:
http://sustainabledesignupdate.com/?p=462
"Up till now people in the developing world have been stymied by the
high cost of software. SAGE changes everything."
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~-
http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1418
The optional doc-tests have me confused for this bug. The doc-tests in
sage/interfaces/magma.py don't fail on my PC but I don't have magma installed.
However, the patch there adds a doc-test section for __floordiv__ which fails
on
my PC. Why do
http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1441
I agree that the observed symptom is not desirable, but I think that latex'ing
x1 as x_1 is more desirable than fixing the "bug". Therefore, I offer my vote
that this bug is invalid.
--
Joel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
T
On Dec 17, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> I'm trying to define inverse csc, sec, and cot and their hyperbolic
> versions. I dug through
> $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-main/build/sage/calculus/calculus.py and
> thought I
I managed to implement them, and they work and everything. I've attached
a me
Bill,
This question can be answered at (at least) two levels with very
different levels of sophistication.
For point searching on elliptic (and more general curves) there are
lots of algorithms and implementatons. There's a stand-alone C
program by M. Stoll and other called ratpoints, and my mw
42 matches
Mail list logo
