Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1 > (probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be elsewhere). >
How would you propose handling the case "x subscript n" (i.e., $x_n$)? -Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
