I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1 (probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be elsewhere).
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote: > > http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1441 > > I agree that the observed symptom is not desirable, but I think > that latex'ing > x1 as x_1 is more desirable than fixing the "bug". Therefore, I > offer my vote > that this bug is invalid. > > -- > Joel > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---