On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> I would say that latexing x_1 as x_1 is a bug, it should be x\_1
>> (probably, haven't looked at what the implications would be
>> elsewhere).
>>
>
> How would you propose handling the case "x subscript n" (i.e., $x_n$)?
I'm not sure I understand your question, but to be more precise,
here's what I'm suggesting:
sage: latex(var('x1'))
x_{1}
sage: latex(var('x_1'))
x\_{1}
- Robert
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
