On 3/23/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let me be the first on this list to congratulate you! IMHO, this is a
> big contribution..
>
> I'm not sure how to browse a patch and even if I did, I'm not sure I'd
> understand your code. How much is Sagex and how much is Python?
Just appl
> > "The final calculation was carried out on an 8-core AMD machine with
> > 64 gigabytes of RAM, run by William Stein at the University of
> > Washington.[7] The group is working on the larger task of producing an
> > atlas of Lie groups and representations."
>
> Ah... it's always instructive to
On 3/23/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
>
> > In a similar note the wikipedia entry on the E8 group actually has
> > a better
> > description than the article from Science Magazine:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematic
On 3/23/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please install rsync? It is needed is needed by my mirroring
> scripts.
Done.
And regarding this:
> You might be able to use
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/rewriteguide.html to internally
> redirect everything after say sage
On Mar 23, 2007, at 6:35 PM, William Stein wrote:
> 1. The operating system is amd64 Debian. This is a completely fresh
> install,
> so it's likely some packages you might need are not installed right
> now.
> Let me know, and I'll apt-get 'em. (And as I write this I haven't
> copied /usr/l
On 3/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sage.math.washington.edu is back. If you have an account there, you
> should be able to log in with ssh.
>
> 1. The operating system is amd64 Debian. This is a completely fresh install,
> so it's likely some packages you might need
Let me be the first on this list to congratulate you! IMHO, this is a
big contribution..
Can you give some timings, comparing your package vs nauty?
I'm not sure how to browse a patch and even if I did, I'm not sure I'd
understand your code. How much is Sagex and how much is Python?
+++
On 3/23/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea when the notebooks will be back up and when you will release 2.4?
The notebooks are now up. Unfortunately, exactly the configuration
I used to make http://www.sagenb.org point to port 8100 does not
work with apache2 on Debian -- t
Any idea when the notebooks will be back up and when you will release 2.4?
On 3/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/23/07, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 3. And most importantly, 16 cores!!! sage.math
On 3/23/07, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3. And most importantly, 16 cores!!! sage.math is now has twice the
> > processing power as it had before.
>
> Out of curiosity:
>
> 1. Where did you buy sage.math? We may be looking
On Mar 23, 2007, at 10:16 , Michel wrote:
>
> That looks like a good link. I just read through the article there and
> the author
> really seems to know his stuff.
>
> There is GPL'ed code for the index calculus method over GF(p)
> as well as some other things. I didn't managed to compile it (ye
On 3/23/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That looks like a good link. I just read through the article there and
> the author
> really seems to know his stuff.
>
> There is GPL'ed code for the index calculus method over GF(p)
> as well as some other things. I didn't managed to compile it (
On 3/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. And most importantly, 16 cores!!! sage.math is now has twice the
> processing power as it had before.
Out of curiosity:
1. Where did you buy sage.math? We may be looking for a similar box
in the future. Has it worked out OK for you h
Hi,
sage.math.washington.edu is back. If you have an account there, you
should be able to log in with ssh.
1. The operating system is amd64 Debian. This is a completely fresh install,
so it's likely some packages you might need are not installed right now.
Let me know, and I'll apt-get 'em. (
William Stein wrote:
>
> I'm working on sage.math.washington.edu right now. I'm now trying to
> install amd64 Debian (not ubuntu), as it turned out that the university
> Redhat site license is only for the 32-bit version of Redhat.
>
Why not Fedora Core 6, which is way ahead of RHL?
Jaap
On Mar 23, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
> In a similar note the wikipedia entry on the E8 group actually has
> a better
> description than the article from Science Magazine:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematics)
>
> "The final calculation was carried out on an 8-core AMD
Hi,
http://www.sagemath.org is basically completely back online. This
restores all the SAGE web services except for the notebooks.
In particular, if you do
export SAGE_SERVER="http://www.sagemath.org/";
you should be able to get optional packages, do hg_sage.send('package.hg')
etc. In sage-2.
On Mar 23, 2007, at 12:30 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 3/23/07, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "In the end the calculation took about 77 hours on the
>> supercomputer Sage."
>>
>> Would it be *that* embarrassing to admit that almost anyone
>> with a high end "gaming" desktop computer c
On 3/23/07, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this was kind of a rhetorical question by Bill. I think what
> Bill is saying
> is that the press release did not try to find out more
> about the software behind the science, in this case the Sage, not that
> you or any developer tri
> > Do we have to promote our work this way?
>
> "We" are not promoting it this way -- I had nothing to do with it, nor did
> anybody else on sage-devel.
I think this was kind of a rhetorical question by Bill. I think what
Bill is saying
is that the press release did not try to find out more
abou
On 3/23/07, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "In the end the calculation took about 77 hours on the
> supercomputer Sage."
>
> Would it be *that* embarrassing to admit that almost anyone
> with a high end "gaming" desktop computer could do this same
> calculation in about the same amount of
Hello,
The sage websites, wikis, etc., will be mostly unusable until this afternoon.
We should have everything back to normal (and better) including sage.math
by this afternoon.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
--~--~-~--~~
That looks like a good link. I just read through the article there and
the author
really seems to know his stuff.
There is GPL'ed code for the index calculus method over GF(p)
as well as some other things. I didn't managed to compile it (yet?)
as I don't have NTL installed outside sage.
Michel.
On 3/23/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm too bad.
>
> Googling didn't reveal any open source implementations.
> The index calculus algorithm makes use of linear algebra
> over mod rings. Perhaps that is what makes it difficult to implement?
>
I suspect the issue is more that people w
On Mar 23, 2007, at 09:09 , Michel wrote:
> Googling didn't reveal any open source implementations.
> The index calculus algorithm makes use of linear algebra
> over mod rings. Perhaps that is what makes it difficult to implement?
I may be off-base, but I think 'index calculus' is, or involves,
On Mar 23, 2007, at 09:01 , Bill Page wrote:
> As much as I value getting some long needed press for things
> related to computer algebra, I am particularly disturbed that a
> high profile publication like Science Magazine from the American
> Association for the Advancement of Science should so
Hmm too bad.
Googling didn't reveal any open source implementations.
The index calculus algorithm makes use of linear algebra
over mod rings. Perhaps that is what makes it difficult to implement?
Michel
On Mar 23, 4:29 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/07, Michel <[EMAIL
In a recent widely distributed online edition of Science
Magazine, SCIENCE News This Week March 23 2007, 315 (5819)
Dana Mackenzie writes:
MATHEMATICS:
Mapping the 248-Fold Way
Dana Mackenzie
This week, an international team of 18 mathematicians and
computer scientists called the Atlas Project an
On 3/23/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an implementation of the index calculus algorithm for
> discrete logs available in sage?
> It didn't seem to be mentionned in the manual.
I'm not aware of one being implemented in SAGE, or any of its components.
Are you aware of any good op
Is there an implementation of the index calculus algorithm for
discrete logs available in sage?
It didn't seem to be mentionned in the manual.
Regards,
Michel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fr
30 matches
Mail list logo
