[rtgwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-19.txt

2024-11-22 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-19.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group (RTGWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing Authors: Ahmed Bashandy Stephane Litkowski Clar

[rtgwg] Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-18.txt

2024-11-22 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
I have posted version -19 of the draft with the diffs that I sent yesterday Thanks Ahmed On 11/21/24 2:30 PM, Yingzhen Qu wrote: Hi Jim, Ack. I've been following the discussion in this thread and I agree with your suggestion. The chairs will send an email to the mailing list about this ma

[rtgwg] Re: Next steps with draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2024-11-22 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi Greg, Your request is well received. While I'm looking for a shepherd for this document, I'd suggest you update the draft to reflect the publication of RFC 9568 (RFC5798bis), for example please use "Backup Router" as in RFC 9568 instead of "Backup router". Also the readability of the document

[rtgwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Charter updates

2024-11-22 Thread Alexander Vainshtein
Yingzhen, Lots of thanks! Regards, Sasha Get Outlook for Android From: Yingzhen Qu Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2024 5:53:25 AM To: Alexander Vainshtein Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [rtgwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Charter updates Hi Sash

[rtgwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Charter updates

2024-11-22 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi Sasha, Yes, your understanding is correct. If there are enough interests in the WG, RTGWG may adopt a problem statement draft and work on it. Thanks, Yingzhen On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:36 AM Alexander Vainshtein < alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com> wrote: > Yingzhen, > > The proposed text looks

[rtgwg] Next steps with draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2024-11-22 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear WG Chairs, the authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd believe that it is ready for the WG LC. Draft was reviewed by SecDir, RtgDir, and OpsDir. According to the note from Joe Clarke , we addressed all concerns of OpsD