Hi Greg,

Your request is well received.

While I'm looking for a shepherd for this document, I'd suggest you update
the draft to reflect the publication of RFC 9568 (RFC5798bis), for example
please use "Backup Router" as in RFC 9568 instead of "Backup router".

Also the readability of the document could be further improved. Here is an
example for you to consider:
Old:

This document discusses the applicability of Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection (BFD) for multipoint networks to provide Virtual Router
Redundancy Protocol with sub-second convergence for the process
determining the Active router and defines the extension to bootstrap
point-to-multipoint BFD session.


New:

This document explores the applicability of Bidirectional Forwarding

Detection (BFD) in multipoint networks to enable sub-second convergence

in the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) for determining the

Active Router. Additionally, it defines extensions to bootstrap

point-to-multipoint BFD sessions.


Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 8:55 AM Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear WG Chairs,
> the authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd believe that it is ready for
> the WG LC. Draft was reviewed by SecDir, RtgDir, and OpsDir. According to
> the note from Joe Clarke
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/w4AU2ftt6rb7ZueeG_y2vWBd7J8/>,
> we addressed all concerns of OpsDir in version -07. The draft is stable and
> defines a practical solution for fast convergence in the VRRP environment.
> We appreciate your consideration of opening WG LC on this document.
>
> Regards,
> Greg (on behalf of the authors)
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to