now it sounds like you have too many hard links for rsync to handle.
On 2/7/24 08:05, Franke via rsync wrote:
Am 06.02.24 um 23:20 schrieb Roland:
and then, it stops totally quiet.
you mean it simply exits without any message?
Yes rsync ends totally quit.
what's the return code ( echo $?
here is another report of this behaviour.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/754923/rsync-just-stops
nothing appropriate in bugzilla, besides
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
do you use zfs or is there full-space/quota condition while running?
if you can't resolve, please
and then, it stops totally quiet.
you mean it simply exits without any message?
what's the return code ( echo $? )
roland
Am 06.02.24 um 22:18 schrieb Franke via rsync:
Hi Kevin,
Am 06.02.24 um 20:55 schrieb Kevin Korb:
The other likely cause is your $SOURCE being something that contains a
via rsync
Subject: BUG? rsync ends without message by delete files
Hi!
Is this a bug, or did I miss a setting?
When synchronizing and deleting files, rsync (version 3.2.7 protocol
version 31 AND before) simply stops whitout comments.
No error, no message, nothing in the syslog.
Rsync works nor
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388
Bug ID: 13388
Summary: Feature request: When deleting files only delete files
that are over a certain age.
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307
--- Comment #2 from tombosho...@gmail.com ---
Same for me. No data loss here, but a bunch of work undeleting the files and
moving them back to the right directories.
Files should only be removed if they are actually copied to another location.
--
On 11/22/2011 6:51 AM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 21 Nov 2011, Brian K. White wrote:
On 11/19/2011 9:04 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0100 "Brian K. White" wrote:
nj2:/opt/x # rsync -avvvn --force --delete --include=/tmp
--include=floof/ --exclude='*' /
On Mon 21 Nov 2011, Brian K. White wrote:
> On 11/19/2011 9:04 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0100 "Brian K. White" wrote:
> >
> >>nj2:/opt/x # rsync -avvvn --force --delete --include=/tmp
> >>--include=floof/ --exclude='*' /tmp/. co4::root/tmp/.
> >
> >D
On 11/21/2011 3:09 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
> pushfile /path/to/thing
> pushfile /path/to/thing host
pushfile /path/to/thing
OR
pushfile /path/to/thing host
--
bkw
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.
On 11/19/2011 9:04 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0100 "Brian K. White" wrote:
nj2:/opt/x # rsync -avvvn --force --delete --include=/tmp
--include=floof/ --exclude='*' /tmp/. co4::root/tmp/.
Detail: /tmp being the "root of the transfer", "--include=/tmp"
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0100 "Brian K. White" wrote:
> nj2:/opt/x # rsync -avvvn --force --delete --include=/tmp
> --include=floof/ --exclude='*' /tmp/. co4::root/tmp/.
Detail: /tmp being the "root of the transfer", "--include=/tmp" is
wrong because it refers then to /tmp/tmp.
I thing yo
Brian K. White wrote:
> ... Looks like it works, but only for files not directories.
>
> All I did was change:
> rsync $OPTS --include=/$F --exclude='*' $P ${h}::root$P
> to
> rsync $OPTS --include=/$F --exclude='*' ${P}/. ${h}::root${P}/.
>
> And now if the file doesn't exist locally it is dele
On 11/15/2011 4:15 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
Brian K. White wrote:
On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
rsync -avx --delete --include=/file --exclude='*' . host2:deltest/.
This didn't work for me, although one difference is my script specifies
a path instead of "." Does this on
Brian K. White wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> > rsync -avx --delete --include=/file --exclude='*' . host2:deltest/.
>
> This didn't work for me, although one difference is my script specifies
> a path instead of "." Does this only work with literally "." in the
> pla
On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
rsync -avx --delete --include=/file --exclude='*' . host2:deltest/.
This didn't work for me, although one difference is my script specifies
a path instead of "." Does this only work with literally "." in the
places above?
My script parses the
On 11/14/2011 2:29 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
Brian K. White wrote:
Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
explicitly by name?
yes :-)
user@host1:~/deltest> ls -a1
.
..
a
b
c
file
user@host1:~/deltest> ssh host2 ls -a1 deltest
.
..
a
b
c
file
user@host1:~/del
Brian K. White wrote:
> Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
> explicitly by name?
yes :-)
user@host1:~/deltest> ls -a1
.
..
a
b
c
file
user@host1:~/deltest> ssh host2 ls -a1 deltest
.
..
a
b
c
file
user@host1:~/deltest> rm file
user@host1:~/deltest> rsync -avx --
On 11/11/2011 5:15 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com) wrote on 11 November 2011 15:59:
>Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
>explicitly by name?
>
>I would have thought that deleting the file locally, the rsyncing the
>non-existin
Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com) wrote on 11 November 2011 15:59:
>Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
>explicitly by name?
>
>I would have thought that deleting the file locally, the rsyncing the
>non-existing file with --del would have resulted in the remote
Is there any way to specify a file to be deleted on the remote side
explicitly by name?
I would have thought that deleting the file locally, the rsyncing the
non-existing file with --del would have resulted in the remote file,
which does exist being deleted.
I have a general purpose script t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307
cool...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cool...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
--- Comment #5 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 20:36 CST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The goal of this ticket is really to make --min-size/--max-size behave more
> like an ordinary exclude.
Whoops, the ticket was originally abo
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
--- Comment #4 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 20:34 CST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I notice that the patch only affects extraneous "special" files immediately
> inside file-list directories, not those in extraneous directorie
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
m...@mattmccutchen.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Don't delete file types that|Don't delete
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 22:56 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> If someone is doing inotify-based --files-from transfers and a filename
> is now missing, maybe they really want --delete-missing-args to ensure
> that the receiver doesn't have a version of the now-missing file.
There's no need for that: t
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:44:56PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Two issues you may wish to correct [...]
Thanks for pointing those out! I've made sure that the mode does not
get tweaked by --chmod if it is 0, and changed the --list-only output
to start with "*missing", as you suggested.
> Whil
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 09:36 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I added an option to the latest development version that supports this:
> --delete-missing-args.
Nice work! I feared the implementation would be much messier. Two
issues you may wish to correct (or I might do it and post the patch):
1. T
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:31:54AM +0100, intripoon wrote:
> Now there are files I want to have deleted on PC B. They don't exist
> on PC A. I hoped I could just add them to the list of files given to
> --from-files, but the sender just tells me "failed: No such file or
> directory (2)" and goes on
Hi !
I have a tree of files on PC A and a tree of files on PC B. PC B runs
rsync in server mode. PC A connects to the rsync server.
There is a file containing the files that rsync should copy efficiently
from PC A to PC B. This works.
Now there are files I want to have deleted on PC B. They
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6061
m...@mattmccutchen.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6061
Summary: [FMR]: Add an option to only delete files once they
expire
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.4
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
>LBackup is not intended for large scale deployment, unless used in
>combination with some sort of file system management tool.
If you are backing up up client machines, chances are that their
configuration will be changing in the near future. In addition, there are
may be different operating sys
You could setup the backups of the 200 clients. However, it would be
easier to setup the backup of a couple of file servers? That would
simplify the situation. Then you can say to people that If you file is on
the server then it is backed up.
If you want to backup the data on 200 client machines y
Thomas von Eyben wrote:
Should it be a problem to have it backup 200 clients to a couple of
xraids (perhaps to be changed to an xsan).
If these 200 clients are going to have a lot of file changes between
the backup periods, then I'd say you may run into issues of the backup
never finishin
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Henri S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>1. delete the oldest backup (.7)
>>2. Increment all the other backups +1
>> (.6 -> .7, .5 -> .6, .4 -> .5, .3 -> .4, and .2 -> .3)
>>3. Create a hard link between .1 -> .2
>>4. Run rsync from the source int
>1. delete the oldest backup (.7)
>2. Increment all the other backups +1
> (.6 -> .7, .5 -> .6, .4 -> .5, .3 -> .4, and .2 -> .3)
>3. Create a hard link between .1 -> .2
>4. Run rsync from the source into .1
This is esentially what LBackup is doing.
The LBackup project also
Henri S wrote:
You could find these files using find. Then, copy these to another
directory and sycn the directory which has only the new files.
If you were cleaver you could hard link the files to save space before the
sync. But maybe someone on this list will know how to do this with just
rsync
If you were to use LBackup and run a backup once per day and set the
rotations to 20. Then after 20 days, the old files would be removed from
the backup.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/
You could find these files using find. Then, copy these to another
directory and sycn the directory which has only the new files.
If you were cleaver you could hard link the files to save space before the
sync. But maybe someone on this list will know how to do this with just
rsync.
This is just o
Matthew, please remember to CC rsync@lists.samba.org .
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 15:46 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> You could use touch to update all of the files in your backup-dir. Then
> use my original suggestion to delete files that are older than two weeks.
I assume you mean, touch on
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 19:03 +0100, Thomas von Eyben wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it would make more sense to count from the time the backup file
> > is saved. To do that, use a separate --backup-dir each day (e.g.,
> > --backup-dir=
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 03:18 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote:
>> Thomas von Eyben wrote:
>> > I wish to use rsync to create a backup BUT only keep the files for a
>> > limited period of time, EG two weeks.
>> > I have not yet be
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 03:18 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> Thomas von Eyben wrote:
> > I wish to use rsync to create a backup BUT only keep the files for a
> > limited period of time, EG two weeks.
> > I have not yet been able to figure out how to do this inside rsync
> > (while the backup is being
You can do something like
"rsync OPTIONS --rsync-path="find /root-dir/ -mtime +14 -delete ; rsync"
SRC DEST"
although, to be safe you'll probably want something like:
"rsync OPTIONS --rsync-path="find /root-dir/ -type f -mtime +14 -delete
; rsync" --prune-empty-dirs SRC DEST"
I'm not sure wheth
Hi list,
I have been reading MAN pages and listarchives, but not found the
answer to my question though I am sure it must be possible to acheive
my wish.
I wish to use rsync to create a backup BUT only keep the files for a
limited period of time, EG two weeks.
I have not yet been able to figure o
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 19:23 -0200, Rivanor P. Soares wrote:
> I'm running rsync (2.6.2)
That's pretty old. You might want to upgrade to the latest stable
version, 2.6.9.
> I want to sync all .fle files from dir1 to the dir2 and also remove
> files from the destination which were removed from the
Hi all,
I'm running rsync (2.6.2) this way (which do not remove files from the
destination side which were removed from the sending side):
rsync -vbu --backup-dir=/bkp --stats /dir1/*.fle /dir2
I want to sync all .fle files from dir1 to the dir2 and also remove
files from the destinatio
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-07 01:17 ---
Thanks. If it is important enough for us, I may consider writing a patch. Maybe
it is a good idea to document this in the manual page. Maybe something like:
--max-delet
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-03 01:23 ---
I don't know if there is an easy check to figure out how many files would be
deleted (my patch is a very naive implementation). I understand that the
--delete-during opt
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408
Summary: when more than --max-delete files are about to be
deleted no error is returned
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-02 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=1003)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1003&action=view)
patch to limit the number of deletes before the deletes take place
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:02:39PM +, Simon wrote:
> Looking around it would appear --delete works upon directory updates,
> but there is nothing in the documentation that indicates that options
> in the example above cannot be used in this way.
I've updated the docs for the next release to ma
Hi,
N.B. rsync version 2.6.2 on Linux, no rsync server, using SSH
THE PROBLEM
rsync --delete
--files-from= -e ssh
-... :
generates error:
receiving file list ... link_stat "
and does not have the desired effect of deleting the remote file
EXAMPLE_FILE_NOT_ON_SECONDARY on the MASTER
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |trivial
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791
Summary: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't
delete files
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status
> if you're using rsync on Windows, you already are using cygwin
> (knowingly or not, rsync is available on Windows ONLY through CygWin, as
> far as I know)
I got my copy direct from cwrsync.
http://www.itefix.no/cwrsync/
It seems to use a Cygwin dll though.
--
To unsubscribe or change option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Halliday wrote:
> A you never said you had XP Home!
> Perhaps it uses 'simple file sharing' by default?
In fact I think WinXP Home uses "simple file sharing" and that's all.
But on the WinXP Home I have on my laptop I happily avoid it usin
> Yes, of course. It should be very easy.
>
> Except, the only funny thing is I actually couldn't find security tab in
> the file properties.
>
> However, after searching in google, here's what I got.
>
> The security is by default turn off in WinXP. In order to turn it back on
> in XP, just go
e
this option.
Regards,
Sanpee
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Halliday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chang Wooi Po" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "rsync" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Windows] Unable to delete fil
> Now, how could I delete or change attribute or the files on machine1
> other then having to reformat the drive.
You simply need to gain owership of the files.
Select the files, pop up the properties.
Choose the security tab and see who does have permission to access these files.
If its not an
Hi all,
I'm newbie to rsync, not sure if I use it correctly.
I installed rsync v2.6.2 protocol version 28 on 2 of my machines at
home. Both running WinXP SP1.
On the machine (named machine 1) with NTFS formatted drive, I issued the
following commands
>rsync -varuz "machine2::My
gt;
> Tim Conway
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Daniel Ramaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 09/19/2002 03:49 PM
> Please respond to daniel.ramaley
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
>
Ramaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/19/2002 03:49 PM
Please respond to daniel.ramaley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:Rsync of several directories doesn't delete files
Classificat
d.
So, deletion does not work if i try to rsync my entire filesystem, but does
work if i only try to rsync one directory. I guess at this poing i'm
looking for some pointers. Is there some switch to rsync that i'm missing
that
hi,
i am into a client server programming. in that it is absolutely necessary
for the rsync server to be installed at the client and rsync client at the
server. The server(rsync client) needs to download from the client(rsync
server) and then delete the source file at the rsync server. right now i
I remember seeing this happen when I first set up my rsync distribution. It
turned out to be a permissions problem on the remote, though not reported as
such - as Dave suggested below. It just wouldn't delete the file. Fixed the
permissions, and then deletion went fine.
I started with a small set
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:02:08AM +0100, Ferran Jorba wrote:
...
> What *did* make a difference is to rsync a single directory, and, thus,
> not using any --exclude directory. Obsolete files (and directories) were
> effectively removed:
>
> rsync \
> --verbose \
> --verbose \
>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:44:44AM -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> you tried --force at all? or -z?
No, I didn't, as according to the man page (and Dave's message) it
shouldn't affect much. Anyway, now I've tried, and it didn't affect.
OTOH, -z is equivalent to --compress, which I already used.
Da
gt; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:50:17 +0100
> > From: Ferran Jorba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: rsync doesn't delete files (over ssh)
> >
> > I'm mirroring a whole Linux system, hoping that in the future
> > we can have a farm
you tried --force at all? or -z?
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Ferran Jorba wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:50:17 +0100
> From: Ferran Jorba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: rsync doesn't delete files (over ssh)
>
> I'm mirroring a whol
I'm mirroring a whole Linux system, hoping that in the future
we can have a farm of identical systems from a master one.
Temporarily, I'm using --relative to see the results on an
Alpha OSF system. The problem is that rsync doesn't delete
on the client the files removed on the server.
rsync \
73 matches
Mail list logo
