https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
------- Comment #4 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 20:34 CST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I notice that the patch only affects extraneous "special" files immediately > inside file-list directories, not those in extraneous directories. [...] The goal of this ticket is really to make --min-size/--max-size behave more like an ordinary exclude. And the decision to be made is whether this exclude is "perishable". I realize that different users may have different expectations about how these options behave. See, for example, the following request that --max-size behave as a real hide rather than a transfer rule: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2009-November/024300.html So probably the most general solution is to add filter rules based on size and a new filter action that means "show but don't process" to emulate a transfer rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
