Matt,
Thanks for your response.
These settings are working quit well :
rsync -av --exclude=$EXCLUDE --delete --ignore-errors --no-o --no-p
--chmod=ugo=rwX $SRCPATH $DSTPATH >> mail.txt
I will now try to find a solution about timestamps issue. As far as I know
there is no NSS configuration
sett
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 00:49 -0800, Zemitch wrote:
> rsync 2.6.8 on OES 2 Linux
>
> On an OES 2 Linux server I mount a Netware volume (ncpmount) that is the
> destination server.
>
> All volumes are NSS.
>
> Some files are renamed in the destination volume.
>
> For example :
>
> (/media/backup
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wayne Davison
Sent: Thursday, 16 November 2006 11:57 AM
To: William McInnis
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync problems
Did you follow my last instructions? It sounds like you're talking to
an rsync daemon, so you'll need t
Did you follow my last instructions? It sounds like you're talking to
an rsync daemon, so you'll need to make sure that the client is given
the same timeout option on the command-line that the daemon has
configured into it so that it can send periodic keep-alive messages.
Even, then, if your timeo
On Saturday 21 October 2006 21:57, Philip W. wrote:
> I have gotten an Rsync daemon set up on my Linux server. But I want to
> use my Windows XP computer to upload files to an Rsync module on the
Try using the cwrsync package available from http://www.itefix.no/cwrsync/ and
more specifically th
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:57:29PM -0400, Philip W. wrote:
> I have tried compiling various versions of Rsync in Cygwin, and
> nothing works.
There's a binary version linked from the rsync download page -- cwRsync:
http://rsync.samba.org/download.html
You might want to try that.
..wayne..
-
On 10/21/06, Philip W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have tried compiling various versions of Rsync in Cygwin,
and nothing works.
We'll help if you give us a better idea of what goes wrong. Does
rsync compile successfully? Does it install successfully? If so,
what happens when you run rsync?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:55:31PM -0400, Robert Caskey wrote:
> I got this mail from a cronjob and can't figure out what is causing
> rsync to crap out on me. I received the message at 5:03, when the cron
> job is scheduled to run at 4:00, so total runtime is approximately an
> hour.
>
> Machi
On Fri 23 Apr 2004, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> Thanks. Do you think I should forward it to the Debian rsync package
> maintainer?
Don't bother, the Debian rsync maintainer is of course subscribed to the
rsync mailing list :-)
Anyhow, the patch will be in the upcoming 2.6.1 anyway, so there's no
real
> Wayne Davison writes:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:34:55AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> Just checking: in essence you will [revert] the change to flist.c that
>> I had mentioned earlier? (In that case I would try to have the Debian
>> maintainer revert the 2.6.1 style patch relative to the
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:34:55AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> Just checking: in essence you will [revert] the change to flist.c that
> I had mentioned earlier? (In that case I would try to have the Debian
> maintainer revert the 2.6.1 style patch relative to the 2.6.0 upstream
> as well ...)
No,
> Wayne Davison writes:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:42:44AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>> The global [cvs-excludes] are inserted into the exclude list at the
>> point they're mentioned.
> Sorry, that was based on a false remembrance. The global cvs-excludes
> are always appended to the lis
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:42:44AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The global [cvs-excludes] are inserted into the exclude list at the
> point they're mentioned.
Sorry, that was based on a false remembrance. The global cvs-excludes
are always appended to the list after the user-supplied exclude opt
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:06:58PM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> Is there a way of overriding the excludes from .cvsignore?
It depends on which one you mean. The global ones are inserted into the
exclude list at the point they're mentioned. For instance:
rsync --include='*.tar.gz' -C from/ to
> Wayne Davison writes:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:21:24AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> I can partially reproduce this by (starting from a state where the two
>> dirs are in sync) copying an additional file into 'Recommended' and
>> trying different versions of rsync to see whether the file
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:21:24AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> I can partially reproduce this by (starting from a state where the two
> dirs are in sync) copying an additional file into 'Recommended' and
> trying different versions of rsync to see whether the file gets
> removed.
Does the file you
There are two things that bring that message. One is the inability to
chroot. I think non-chrootable operating systems get their rsync
configured so it never tries (and therefore, never fails). If you're on a
real OS, you might be initiating the daemon as a non-root user (uid in the
module d
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:14:47PM -0400, Daniel Teklu wrote:
> 1. @ERROR: chroot failed
This probably means that the server isn't running as root. Either turn
off chroot in the config file, or run rsync with more privs (and use the
uid/gid options to bring them back down again).
> building file
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:27:55PM -0500, Hunter French wrote:
>
> I am having problems with Rsync running between 2 FreeBSD computers. We
> are trying to use it to backup a directory on the primary server
> /var/mail (using a pull method). The configuration on the primary
> server (Polaris) sh
Andrew,
Thanks very much for the response!
I am embarrassed -- I realize why rsync was copying the entire file --
my mistake -- I started it from the wrong directory and it was creating
the file from scratch. Anyway that's the good news (sort of).
The bad news is that I'm back to the situation
Here are some possible explanations:
1) you used --partial on an earlier attempt and interrupted the
transfer. That would leave you with a partial and potentially much
smaller image locally, which would mean a subsequent transfer would
send most of the file
2) the corruption is spread t
Drew,
Thanks for the response!
Very frustrating! I guess an iso consists of a mixture of binary and
ASCII data (which I've confirmed somewhat by running less on the file.
Lots of @^@^, but occasional patches of readable text. After reading
some of the description of how the rsync algorithm wo
Jason Haar wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:51:40PM +0100, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> > I have certainly seen large files that couldn't be "repaired" by rsync
> > and needed to be redownloaded.
>
> Indeed. In this case I wonder if the original was downloaded in ASCII mode
> instead of binary?
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:51:40PM +0100, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> I have certainly seen large files that couldn't be "repaired" by rsync
> and needed to be redownloaded.
Indeed. In this case I wonder if the original was downloaded in ASCII mode
instead of binary? That would definitely be a downlo
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:42:45PM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> 1. rsync can't repair an iso file except by retransmitting the entire
> file -- unlikely -- somebody would have told me this by now, and some of
> my earlier trials produced results like:
This really depends on how the file was damag
Obergehrer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Montag, 23. Oktober 2000 10:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rsync problems with german umlauts
Hallo Herr Mueller-Lynch,
ich bin gerade auf der Suche nach einer Lösung für dasselbe Problem.
Haben Sie inzwischen neuere Informationen wie man in rsync
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Rsync problems with german umlauts
>
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2000, Mueller-Lynch Thomas wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I'm using rsync for synchronizing files between two web servers. Some of the
>filenames which we synchronize have
On Thu, 05 Oct 2000, Mueller-Lynch Thomas wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm using rsync for synchronizing files between two web servers. Some of the
>filenames which we synchronize have german umlauts (äöüß) and blanks. After
>synchronizing these files the filenames have been switched.
>
>I'm not sure if yo
28 matches
Mail list logo
