>>>>> Wayne Davison writes: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:34:55AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote: >> Just checking: in essence you will [revert] the change to flist.c that >> I had mentioned earlier? (In that case I would try to have the Debian >> maintainer revert the 2.6.1 style patch relative to the 2.6.0 upstream >> as well ...)
> No, the patch you cited is valid and fixes a bug in 2.6.0 (it prevents > .cvsignore entries from affecting files outside of the one directory it > should affect). The weird side-effect of the bug is that nothing gets > put onto the "local" list, so you can't notice that the logic in an > unpatched 2.6.0 doesn't let a global rule override a local rule. The > change I talked about is a new patch, and is already in CVS for the > upcoming 2.6.1 release. I'll attach it to this email. Thanks. Do you think I should forward it to the Debian rsync package maintainer? Best -k -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
