I'm copying files using --link-dest to avoid duplication. I'm also
using a de-duplicator (rmlint) to further reduce duplication. For
files that are duplicates, I've rmlint set to use the timestamp of the
oldest file.
This ends up with starting conditions where the source of a copy might
have bee
t dst/link
content
$
I was expecting, and hoping, that it would remove the src/link symlink,
but as described in the above bug report, that doesn't happen.
Thanks for your time.
l8rZ,
--
andrew - http://afresh1.com
A printer consists of three main parts:
the case, the jammed pap
On 8/1/19 8:56 pm, John Simpson via rsync wrote:
> Any ideas anyone?
How about using snapshots and doing the rsync off those?
https://www.thewindowsclub.com/vss-volume-shadow-copy-service
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/josebda/2007/10/10/the-basics-of-the-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/
Hi,
On 5/12/18 12:36 am, Fabian Cenedese via rsync wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to exclude and delete some items but not delete
> other items. Use case:
>
> I'm on Windows where there are folders like recycle.bin and system
> volume information on every drive. I can exclude them while backing
>
Hi,
NB: I am only subscribed because the list doesn't allow non-subscribers
to post by default. I find that a bit strange, especially for such a
low volume list.
Okay, I've thought about this for a while.
Let's say you do an rsync as a dry run (deliberately), why not allow a
state file to be sa
anges to the
"live" data), the snapshot would fail. For my purposes, I'd want the new
write to fail instead. Destroying snapshots holding backup data didn't
seem a reasonable choice.
How does btrfs deal with such issues?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most r
sabled on a per-volume basis. That would
work for us.
Is there a way to save cycles by offering zfs a hint as to where a
previous copy of a file's blocks may be found?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or cha
em that can do what hard links do, but at the
file page level. I imagine that this would work using the same Copy On
Write logic used in managing memory pages after a fork().
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or chang
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:19:23 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> Look at tools like inotifywait, auditd, or kfsmd to see what's easily
> available to you and what best fits your needs.
>
> [Though I'd also be surprised if nobody has fed audit information into
> rsync before; y
s which is the immediate need
being discussed. On the other hand, this isn't free either. I imagine
that there's some crossover point on one side of which scanning is better
and on the other auditing is better.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitt
Thank you, that's a good idea. I should have thought outside of the
box to begin with! :-)
--
Andrew LaPierre
Information Technology Director
Georgia-Cumberland Conference
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
&g
I think this is an NFS or ext4 question, but wanted to post this here for a
sanity check. :) I've been searching for over a week for a solution and
have turned up nil.
I'm trying to rsync with options -AX over an NFSv4 mount TO an ext4 drive
FROM an ext4 drive and both have acl and user_xattr enab
ith setfacl -m g::--- solves my problem, but this is not
a long term solution.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
We require an option that forces rsync to truncate the destination file to zero
bytes, using the existing inode, before copying (non-atomic).
For various important reasons, we cannot use —inplace as an option due to the
way the filesystem we use handles a retrieve from tape.
Using —temp-dir as
- Original Message -
> From: "Philipp Tölke"
> To: "Andrew Martin" , rsync@lists.samba.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:20:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Preserve ZFS ACLs when syncing to Linux (ext4)
>
> Hi,
>
> Please keep the
:$INDEX_ALLOCATION")
failed: Bad file number (9)
Is there a way I can verify that this extra metadata is being saved
on the local Linux copy?
Thanks,
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.sa
-super --fake-super
root@solaris:/export/share /path/to/local/ext4/dir
Is this possible?
Thanks,
Andrew Martin
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
Hello.
I'm using rsync as a backup solution, from:
Mac OS X 10.8 HFS+, rsync 3.0.9
to:
FreeBSD 9.2 ZFS, rsync 3.1.0
Is using FreeBSD and ZFS as backup storage even possible considering ZFS doesn't
understand HFS extended attributes like the resource fork?
If it is, what command line options sho
better for a new install as it seems rssh is only getting
security fixes. That had me confused as the current version clearly
postdates rsync 3.
--
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https:
nning arbitrary commands, but let them upload files with
sftp/scp/rsync. It used to work - probably between Centos3 and Centos3.
--
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/m
sion 26 and probably doesn't support -e.s anyway.
Why is rsync ignoring the negotiated protocol version and sending unsupported
options ?
--
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada
Tel. +1 (604) 222-7376 (Pacific Time)
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list
ms like it will
abort the entire sync, but I would like just skip over the bad section and
continue with the rest of the backup. Is this possible?
Thanks,
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.or
Hi,
Our organization hosts a specialized Linux distribution.
As is typical with Linux distributions,
the set of files that make up our Linux distro
contains a very complex web of self-referential hard links.
Several other sites use our Linux distro
and maintain either partial or full
internal
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:46:06 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> rsync: recv_generator: mkdir
>
> "/backup/host/vol/snapshot.2013.07.11.0.in_progress/live/lms/trylesson/toefl"
> failed: No space left on device (28)
> *** Skipping any contents from this failed directo
of the failure).
My main question is: should it be safe to rely upon the exit code of the remote
rsync? I imagine that I could push the directory-renaming logic to the sending
server, but this is going to introduce a new set of failure cases (eg. the
renaming must be SSHed; the SSH can fail) s
gt; Everything has it's niche. Trying to make one-size-fit-all
> usually results in an unwieldy mess. Rsync is already
> way, way too option-heavy, IMO.
>
Too true!
I don't know the particulars of the rsync options, but I agree
wholeheartedly in the Unix principle: do
versions of rsync considered using a more robust implementation
of file change monitoring, like Dropbox
<https://www.dropbox.com/help/8/en> does?
It looks fast on my machine.
--
Cheers,
Andrew Pennebaker
www.yellosoft.us
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the
using it isn't my machine to administer.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:13 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> Assuming my expectation is correct, and that --fuzzy should have an
> effect in this case, I'm wondering how best to test what's occurring.
> I've tried using --itemize-changes in a --dry-run, but all it tells me
me name but which is not
a match, is there a way around this? That is, is there some extra option
which forces the fuzzy comparison when the identified possible basis file
is not a match?
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubs
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:43:02 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> I've thought of two solutions: (1) deliberating breaking linking (and
> therefore wasting disk space) or (2) using a different file system.
>
> This is running on CentOS 5, so xfs was there to be tried. I've had
tself not working.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:07:33 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:
> If that is the only thing that is different you might be using rsync
> incorrectly.
And that's why you left it being reported? Interesting idea. Thanks for
explaining.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most repli
always report a
modified file as having a different inode?
That takes me a "quick and dirty" solution for this. Simply do a find
looking for files with a -links (link count) of 1 to see what files are
newly copied in the newer directory tree.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-a
means that the file isn't checked for changes each time rsync runs).
I guess I'm vague on a lot of the ideas around the of checksums.
Enlightenment would be welcome.
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or ch
ely unchanged or do you
mean that nothing is changed but for an ACL, which is changed?
If the latter, I believe that what you describe as occurring is the
expected behavior.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or ch
ges the new copy's ACL.
Does this help you?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
ink-dest for
backups too, and this lets me quickly/easily see the size of the "delta"
between snapshots.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
#x27;t know enough
about this bit of the rsync code. If it is trying to defend against this
then IMO it should be using an HMAC rather than just a hash code. Assuming
it doesn't need these strengths/safeguards then maybe it should use a
cheaper (i.e. quicker) hashing algorithm.
Regards,
And
nc should, when faced with this
error, fall back on creating a copy. But should rsync include behavior
that exists only to work around a file system limit? Perhaps only as a
command line option (ie. definitely not the default behavior)?
Thanks...
- Andrew
--
Please use re
The machines to which I distribute have changed and the new machines have
the older version of rsync, 2.6.6. The problems have gone away. This makes
me wonder if it is something that was introduced after 2.6.6...
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
Internet
ja...@shareable.org
02/06/2010 13:55
To
On Sat, 29 May 2010 11:34:56 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> If anyone has a suggested auth method, let me know.
Lifting the key-pair solution used by openssh?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: ht
machines I got
these errors from over a dozen today. That's more than usual but it's all
random when it comes down to it. I wonder who else is rsyncing on this
scale.
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
Internet
ja...@shareable.org
02/06/2010 13:55
To
Andrew MARLOW
cc
rsync@lists.samba.org
, and regardless of which operating system?
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
___
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please
notify the sender immedi
makes me think that it might actually be a problem
with rsync. Maybe rsync should watch out for temporary loss of network
connectivity or slowness like you get in WANs sometimes. Maybe it should
tolerate these sorts of errors subject to a maximum number of retries.
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
NO
On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:38:24 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> Copying this volume takes hours...far more than other volumes of similar
> size. I blame the much larger amount of directory traversal (and
> comparisons between source and destination) that are occurring.
BTW, running a trac
hese rsync operations?
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors)
(code 23) at main.c(1619) [generator=3.1.0dev]
zsh: exit 23sudo /home/andrew/src/rsync-HEAD-20100331-2202GMT/rsync -a
--hard-links
That's not terrible. Ideally, the "vanished" file would have been
omitted
il?
Note that this doesn't even have to work across a network to meet my
needs, though that would be ideal. I could always run it after the
transfer is completed (which means I'll have both copies of the file on
the same system).
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for m
to clear that up.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
ust coffee-deprived) to
grasp this. How does having --target-dir make it possible to copy many
files in a single command that was not previously possible?
Is this still related to xargs use?
Sorry...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:22:11 -0400, Sam wrote:
> As far as I know it's still there
That's what I thought. So what is the point behind --target-dir?
Sorry for the puzzlement...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscr
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:47:54 -0400, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> They added the option to get cp & mv working well with xargs
What happened to the -I option to xargs? This permits one to do the
replacement anywhere on the command line being repeated.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:14:42 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> I was thinking that an alternative to links, which do nothing to
> preserve space when small file changes have been made, would be using
> LVM snapshots. Instead of creating a new directory for a new backup,
> and specifying
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:14:42 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> Where this "fails" is for large files that have received small changes.
> The directory containing my main IMAP account, for example, typically
> generates between 1 and 2 G of daily backup data as I file mes
t;little details", like assuring that there's enough space in the snapshot
to handle the changes to the live volume.
That's why, before I start experimenting, I thought I'd ask what others
have done/tried/abandoned.
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for m
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:01:04 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> It can also potentially be extended in other directions. For one crazy
> example, the utility (or some other utility that modifies the first
> utilities configuration) could listen on a port for messages from -
> pres
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:04:46 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> One thing you can do is
> temporarily attach strace.
I find lsof very informative with respect to rsync's status.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscrib
tion) could listen on a port for messages from -
presumably - the receiving server. That would be a way for the receiving
server to tell the sender what bandwidth to consume.
I'm not clear that this is an improvement over withholding ACKs, mind
you, but at least it is a possibility with which
distance (ie. ingress policing on a VLAN's gateway interface). In that
case, at least, it works rather well. But I don't believe I've ever
tried this to throttle traffic inbound over a WAN link.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mail
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:09:41 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> On 9/14/2009 9:25 AM, Andrew Gideon wrote:
>
>> So control is most effective at the sending rsync, which suggests that
>> bwlimit is a good approach. But the most information is available at
>> the receiving
h. But the most information is available at the
receiving router, suggesting that shaping at the router is also a good
approach.
Interesting.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/m
rring at a given time.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
mittedly poorly documented, but (2) quite potent.
You could put the rsync traffic into a low priority queue, where it gets
all the bandwidth not being used by something else. Or you could set a
minimum, so that the rsync cannot be completely starved out.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply
that Oracle has its own replication engine
for this purpose. As much as I like rsync, wouldn't it make more sense
to use the Oracle-provided mechanism?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samb
()s the real rsync binary) if compression is set?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
consume increasing space in the underlying storage over time.
If you use something other than LVM, then there is likely an equivalent
to lvcreate -s.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://list
he key pair, via authorized_keys2, has access only to the
"sudo rsync" command.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
ged from copy to copy on clients?
Either way, --link-dest is your friend in this case.
Or do you mean something else?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Befo
vailable. Have you tried
upgrading to that?
Are you using 32 or 64 bit? Rsync isn't likely the issue, but perhaps
volume of net or disk traffic being moved is. Have you tried limiting
the bandwidth (either bwlimit or tc) to see if this makes a difference?
- Andrew
--
Please use
ns of the files be copied?
I'm wondering if a timestamp mechanism (ie. using something like find's
cnewer option) would be right, or perhaps a list of files and rsync's
exclude-from option.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
gh, is that snapshots do use disk space at least
temporarily. The more dynamic the stored content, and the longer the
snapshot is required, the more space will need to be available.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or cha
"quiescent", but it will
guarantee consistency (in the sense that the entire copy will be from a
given moment in time).
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo
onsider doing a copy w/o --link-dest, and then running a program
to look for linking opportunities, but I cannot imagine that this would
really be an improvement. And maybe improvement really isn't possible.
But I thought I'd ask, just in case...
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Plea
ther that rsh yielded poor results. What did you do for
"simple data copy tests" that did well?
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting,
(ie. "policing") to slow the client's sending).
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb
s.
And unfortunately (1) the handling of ACLs has changed enough that my
previous work is useless, and (2) I just haven't had the time to revisit
this myself.
Thanks...
Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or c
is (8) machines
sitting around.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
en I run this test.
[...]
>
> http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-October/016400.html
>
> I'll have to reread that thread.
Small world. That was a previous attempt to rejoin the users of the
public rsync version.
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to
mask::r-x
other::r-x
[EMAIL PROTECTED] t]#
- Andrew
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
:r-x
other::r-x
[EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# rsync --version
rsync version 3.0.4 protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit file
es not work recursively, --delete doesnt work. Even
with the line I use above I still have a problem - rsync wants to
recursively scan ALL directories on $DST, very inefficient. It would be
nice if it could simply ask for the files in the list, and delete anything
in $DST recursively that did not fit
up rsync, but was
hoping there was something built in to rsync to avoid this added complexity.
Thanks in advance for any advice,
Andrew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting
ems at once?
That's a nightmare, esp. for those outside of my direct control!
- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
p (excluding the first backup
of any volume, of course).
- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
nt to save every 30th daily backup for 31 days.
You can also save yourself some mental effort by avoiding the phrase
"rotating". One rotates tapes. Using a "to disk" tool like rsync for
backup (esp. given options like --link-dest {8^) eliminates that as a
consideration.
all is well). But...
Does the CVS version have the fix for ACL differencing too (ie. doing "the
right thing" when using --link-dest and a file has changed only in its
ACLs)?
Thanks...
- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
cond processing
of the directory, which triggered the call to do_chmod(), "broke" the
directory's ACL (which had been correct up to that moment).
> Alternatively, Solaris senders could pretend their group mode bits were
> equal to the ACL_MASK and Solaris receivers could ignore gr
r ACL. Afterward, it
has the wrong mask.
I don't know why there is a second call to set_file_attrs() for the
directory, or why it is doing something different. I also don't know how
do_chmod() (which is ACL-ignorant) is changing the mask. But as I wrote,
this one I'm still
r as I can tell, this is setting the mask value based upon the file's
group mode. But I don't know why that would be desired. So I'm not sure
what to do to fix this problem.
Any help, please?
I'm wondering if the test is wrong, and if it shouldn't be:
racl->
presume) will have "official" fix for ACL-diffing.
- Andrew
[1] I think that it fails to note the change, so the new snapshot
still contains the old ACL.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
ch
>> before I post it?
>
> That's the main user of unchanged_attrs(), so if it works well with
> that, you've probably got a good patch.
Okay, that's the type of in-depth knowledge I lacked.
Thanks...
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://l
uot;).
>
> I've never seen that myself.
I found out why, as I wrote via Bugzilla. At least 2.6 linuxes require
the xaddrs patch. I've not tried on a 2.4 (but I will as I'm curious).
Solaris does not require the xaddrs patch.
- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or
- besides --link-dest use - should I do to test this patch
before I post it?
The main change is in unchanged_attrs(), where this now can detect ACL
changes.
Thanks...
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
offline backup, which involves stopping the services. I use a program called 4files which you can search for on Google to delete old ntbackup files older than say 7 days, then you end up with 7 days worth of backups on the Exchange server and on the server you synced to.
Thanks,
Andrew
nfigure
thinks that ACLs are not available (despite telling configure
"--with-acl-support"). I know that Fedora Core 5 is shipping with a 2.6.8
that does recognize ACLs, but I've not yet traced down what it is doing
that is different than what I'm doing.
Any suggestions or pointe
to be excluded from the job completely, however, they still seem to be copied.
Do I have a problem with either the exclude or rsync syntax?
Thanks.
Andrew.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Lokier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 June 2006 19:43
To: Matt McCutchen
Cc: Andrew Hodgson; rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Rsyncing a very large directory tree (over 50,000 files)
>Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> Yes, rsync will send the comp
to
exclude the bin directory and anything in the binbackup directory apart from
the bin directory within.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Andrew.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart
txt
TestA/file2.txt
TestA/sync.sh
I was wondering, short of moving the subversion server to the source
machine, or running rsync twice and doing some output matching, how
this might be accomplished?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
