On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:19:53 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>> First of all, the patch places sysacls.[hc] one directory too high.
>> These need to be in the libs directory, lest 'make' will fail.
>
> This means that you didn't use a -p option to patch -- you should use
> either -p1 (modern patches) or -p0 (older patches).
Oh. I didn't see this mentioned anywhere.
>> More importantly: when I build on CentOS 4 or Fedora Core 5, configure
>> thinks that ACLs are not available (despite telling configure
>> "--with-acl-support").
>
> I've never seen that myself.
I found out why, as I wrote via Bugzilla. At least 2.6 linuxes require
the xaddrs patch. I've not tried on a 2.4 (but I will as I'm curious).
Solaris does not require the xaddrs patch.
- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
