all!
E.
2015-06-13 13:18 GMT-03:00 Darren Broom :
> Well, maybe it is just me, then!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Darren
>
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* james.cl...@nist.gov
> *Sent:* Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:03:53 +
> *To:* rietveld_l@ill.fr
> *Subject:*
Well, maybe it is just me, then!Best regards,Darren-Original Message-From: james.cl...@nist.govSent: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:03:53 +To: rietveld_l@ill.frSubject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Not a great deal of difference between these entities, IMHO.
Jim
So as, perhaps, to summarize:
Everybody is happy if he can find the best way for him to communicate
Countries' censures can be best bypassed using multiplication of
communication ways
Scientific data preservation is best ensured over long times by this
multiplication
Diversity is not bad,
After all this discussion, the post on Anomalous Scattering illustrates
both the interest and the limitations of the Rietveld mailing list.
1. It shows that a good question will rapidly receive answers from experts
in the field.
2. Both question and answers will be read by a large number of others
2
À : chenhh
Cc : rietveld_l@ill.fr
Objet : Re: Politics-RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Thanks for adding just this comment ! While reading it I have realized that the
group is mostly populated by people who have either never experienced open
censoring of their communicatio
dsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
On a related note, with regard to accessing Facebook at work, I generally
only use it to keep in touch with friends; and I try to avoid mixing the
two. I'm sure I'm not alone in doing this.
For work-r
,;''';;::;'''';';,:::;;
;;;:;;;::::,,''''';;''+';;';:;
;;;:;;,'''''';;'
essing Facebook at work, I generally
>> only use it to keep in touch with friends; and I try to avoid mixing the
>> two. I'm sure I'm not alone in doing this.
>>
>> For work-related activities, etc, I tend to use LinkedIn.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>&
;;
:;:,,+''';;:::';'';',,,,,::::;;;;;
:;;;::,,,;''';;::;'''';';,:::;
:;;;,,'''
301) 975 5334
>>
>>
>>
>> From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On
>> Behalf
>> Of Darren Broom
>> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:17 AM
>> To: Young Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
>> Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Di
...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On
Behalf Of Darren Broom
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:17 AM
To: Young Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
On a related note, with regard to accessing Facebook at work, I
generally only use it to kee
5334
-Original Message-
From: Lubomir Smrcok [mailto:uachs...@savba.sk]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 1:30 PM
To: Cline, James Dr.
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Well,
Strictly speaking, you are wasting your time in (formally) two different
-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf
Of Darren Broom
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:17 AM
To: Young Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
On a related note, with regard to accessing Facebook at work, I generally
only use it to keep in touch with friends; and
1) 975 5793
FAX (301) 975 5334
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of
Darren Broom
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:17 AM
To: Young Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
On a related note, with reg
al Message-From: lindsay.yo...@rockets.utoledo.eduSent: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:40:31 +To: rietveld_l@ill.frSubject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
As one of the younger members of the list, I would like to add a few points.
I may never have found this list on my own if my a
be stupied questions,:) ).
Best regards, Daxu
From: Leopoldo Suescun
To: "rietveld_l@ill.fr"
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear Colleagues,
IMHO the Rietveld List is for rather a
,:) ).Best regards, Daxu
From: Leopoldo Suescun
To: "rietveld_l@ill.fr"
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear Colleagues,
IMHO the Rietveld List is for rather advanced students and scientists that are
rather fa
adovan Cerny
> Laboratoire de Cristallographie, DQMP
> Université de Genève
> 24, quai Ernest-Ansermet
> CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
> Phone : [+[41] 22] 37 964 50, FAX : [+[41] 22] 37 961 08
> mailto : radovan.ce...@unige.ch
> URL: http://www.unige.ch/sciences/cryst
-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of
Alan Coelho
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:04 AM
To: 'Radovan Cerny'; 'Jonathan WRIGHT'; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Radovan
Interesting discussion, html may allow g
Indeed I find the list one of my best resources and when I have some
doubt on a subject, I search the old posts.
Kind regards,
Roberto
Roberto Ribeiro de Avillez
Professor Associado
Dept de Engenharia Química e de Materiais
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
tel. +55 21 3527 123
he...@gmail.com [mailto:alan.he...@gmail.com] De la part de Alan Hewat
Envoyé : mardi 9 juin 2015 17:35
À : Alan Coelho
Cc : Othman Al Bahri; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Objet : Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
the Rietveld mailing list is still where the best knowledgeable is
That's enco
> > Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on facebook
> > http://www.facebook.com/groups/1087352967946225/
So from what I gather we have:
http://www.xrayforum.co.uk
http://www.reddit.com/r/crystallography
http://www.researchgate.net/topic/x-ray_diffraction
There are many other places where c
>
> the Rietveld mailing list is still where the best knowledgeable is
>
That's encouraging Alan. Thanks. Concerning the number of posts you are
right - there are fewer now. I would like to think it's because we have an
archive now, and people profit from past answers rather than asking the
same q
werent so grumpy.
Cheers
Alan
-Original Message-
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf
Of Othman Al Bahri
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2015 12:26 AM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
This is my fifth m
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr on behalf of
Radovan Cerny
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2015 12:03 AM
To: Alan Coelho; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
BTW: I will declare my vested interest in this discussion: I would love for
users of programs like GSA
BTW: I will declare my vested interest in this discussion: I would love for
users of programs like GSAS/Fox/TOPAS/Full-prof etc... to ask scientific
questions in scientific forums rather each program having its own web page
trying to hold back the tide. There are so many young scientists asking
I can never write something and have it interpreted the way I want it to be.
The written word is so hopeless – in my hands that is.
Alan Hewat wrote:
>Hmm ? Are file servers still OK ? Like the Rietveld archive, where people can
>already include links to pictures
I'm afraid respectfully that li
>
> I don't doubt the value of the Rietveld list but pictures are also useful.
> ...at least none of it comes into your inbox.
>
... so you want to be able to post pictures...
... but you prefer they don't come into your own mailbox ?
Hmm ? Are file servers still OK ? Like the Rietveld archive, w
: 'Eduard E. Levin' ; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
In the right side under the picture, there is search in this group function
--
Eduard Levin
Department of Electrochemistry
Chemical Faculty
Moscow State University
Leninskie Gor
In the right side under the picture, there is search in this group function
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of
Eduard E. Levin
Sent: 09 June, 2015 2:55 PM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear all,
my five cents to this discussion, if I may add.
The problem of facebook for me is that there is no search mechanism. As a
consequence, questions one and the same will appear again and again as we saw
here and how it is on ResearchGate now. Add content built-in filtering on top
of that
: mardi 9 juin 2015
12:04 À : Radovan Cerny; 'Jonathan WRIGHT'; rietveld_l@ill.fr Objet : RE:
Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Radovan
Interesting discussion, html may allow graphics but doesn't still mean
e-mailing large files to everyone.
Jon: the IUC
Jonathan WRIGHT'; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Objet : RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Radovan
Interesting discussion, html may allow graphics but doesn't still mean
e-mailing large files to everyone.
Jon: the IUCR also has a facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/iucr
eld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of
Radovan Cerny
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 6:36 PM
To: Jonathan WRIGHT; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Jon,
There is no problem to have pictures in the email. Just need to use HTML format
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of
Radovan Cerny
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 6:36 PM
To: Jonathan WRIGHT; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Jon,
There is no problem to have pictures in the email. Just need to use
ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On
> Behalf Of Radovan Cerny
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:16 AM
> To: LUIS MARIA RODRIGUEZ LORENZO; rietveld_l@ill.fr
> Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
>
> Too many channels = crystallographer's death (free
-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf
> Of Radovan Cerny
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:16 AM
> To: LUIS MARIA RODRIGUEZ LORENZO; rietveld_l@ill.fr
> Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
>
> Too many channels = crystallographer's death (freely translated from an o
[+[41] 22] 37 961 08
mailto : radovan.ce...@unige.ch
URL: http://www.unige.ch/sciences/crystal/cerny/rcerny.htm
De : rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] De la part de
Jonathan WRIGHT
Envoyé : mardi 9 juin 2015 10:16
À : rietveld_l@ill.fr
Objet : Re: Powder Diffraction
Thanks Davide for this useful initiative, I have joined. I don't doubt
the value of the Rietveld list but pictures are also useful.
It was recently bought to my attention that funding may be related to
"public perceptions" of research and for this reason we should pay
attention to things like
nt: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:16 AM
To: LUIS MARIA RODRIGUEZ LORENZO; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Too many channels = crystallographer's death (freely translated from an old
proverb "Too many hunters= rabbit's death).
Rather to express m
9 juin 2015 08:15
À : rietveld_l@ill.fr
Objet : Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
hehe, well played Lubo. People can define themselves as they wish, the problem
is the impression we produce in others with our self-definitions.
still the more channels people have to reach informatio
MARIA RODRIGUEZ LORENZO
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 4:15 PM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
hehe, well played Lubo. People can define themselves as they wish, the problem
is the impression we produce in others with our self-definitions.
still the more
l Message-
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr
[mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf
Of Lubomir Smrcok
Sent: 08 June, 2015 2:49 PM
To: Alan Hewat
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear Alan,
There are plenty of people who call usage of so
n
Behalf
Of Lubomir Smrcok
Sent: 08 June, 2015 2:49 PM
To: Alan Hewat
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear Alan,
There are plenty of people who call usage of so-called social networks
(they
are, in fact, very asocial) "a progress". I
they see a symmetry group!
Maybe a POP-group in FB can teach more about crystallography to a larger
group of scientist!
this is my opinion.
Davide
-Original Message-
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf
Of Lubomir Smrcok
Sent: 08 June, 2015 2:49
I "belong" to Facebook, but I almost never post there. My wife uses one of our
Linux machines to read it so that she can keep up with the postings of our
children and grandchildren.As it is very easy to get malware from Facebook, she
never uses her own computer with Windows 7 as OS.
Anything p
Behalf
Of Lubomir Smrcok
Sent: 08 June, 2015 2:49 PM
To: Alan Hewat
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear Alan,
There are plenty of people who call usage of so-called social networks (they
are, in fact, very asocial) "a progress". I would suggest
c: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
Dear Alan,
There are plenty of people who call usage of so-called social networks (they
are, in fact, very asocial) "a progress". I would suggest to consider De
gustibus non est disputandum, but also Duo
Dear Alan,
There are plenty of people who call usage of so-called social networks
(they are, in fact, very asocial) "a progress". I would suggest to
consider De gustibus non est disputandum, but also Duo cum faciunt idem,
non est idem.
Although I am not member of any of those asocial nets an
eld_l@ill.fr>
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
I can understand that people have different ideas about the ideal format for
discussion, and for some of us email may seem a little "old fashioned". I
suppose we could also use Twitter or any of the other s
Alan,
it is only another way to discuss on powder diffraction.
Davide
From: alan.he...@gmail.com [mailto:alan.he...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alan Hewat
Sent: 08 June, 2015 11:14 AM
To: davide levy
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Powder Diffraction Discussion Group on Facebook
I can
I can understand that people have different ideas about the ideal format
for discussion, and for some of us email may seem a little "old fashioned".
I suppose we could also use Twitter or any of the other social chattering
forums. But multiple groups on the same subject disperses the available
info
52 matches
Mail list logo
