Re: Riak in AWS

2011-09-07 Thread John E. Vincent
If you're not uncomfortable with Chef, you can use the riak cookbook to get things up and going. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Jeremiah Peschka wrote: > Does anyone have a CloudFormation template (or other script) for getting a > Riak cluster up and running in AWS? > --- > Jeremiah Peschka -

Riak Recap for September 3 - 6

2011-09-07 Thread Mark Phillips
Evening, Afternoon, Morning To All For today's Recap: meetups, new code, new production users, blog posts, and more. Enjoy. Mark Community Manager Basho Technologies wiki.basho.com twitter.com/pharkmillups --- Riak Recap for September 3 - 6 =

Re: Review request: revamped http transport

2011-09-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 20:42, Brett Hoerner wrote: > Greg, can you make a Github pull request from your branch? > > It'd be easier to review the commits together (well, git log is easy) > but more importantly comment in-line. Done: https://github.com/basho/riak-python-client/pull/56 Thanks! -g

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-07 Thread David Smith
Yes, that's the plan. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Jonathan Langevin < jlange...@loomlearning.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply :-) > > * > Joe's email was very informative. Might I then suggest that your pre-draft > release notes all be emailed to the list when available (similar to Joe's >

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-07 Thread Jonathan Langevin
Thanks for the reply :-) * Joe's email was very informative. Might I then suggest that your pre-draft release notes all be emailed to the list when available (similar to Joe's email), so that those of us interesting in tinkering with 1.0PR have relevant info available? If not, that's understandabl

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-07 Thread David Smith
Hi Jonathan, We're working on compiling all that and we should have a draft of it out in a not too distant PR. It is a fair bit of change, as evidenced by Joe's earlier email about clustering (and that's just _one_ area). MapReduce has undergone a substantial change^H^H^Hrewrite, but we are ship

Re: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-07 Thread Jonathan Langevin
Agreed. I haven't dug into the administration/cluster functionality of Riak yet (any version), but these changes all look excellent, esp based on what I've read about clustering in the past. Very excited for the 1.0 release :-) * Jonathan Langevin Systems Administ

Riak in AWS

2011-09-07 Thread Jeremiah Peschka
Does anyone have a CloudFormation template (or other script) for getting a Riak cluster up and running in AWS? --- Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar PLF, LLC Microsoft SQL Server MVP ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://li

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-07 Thread Jonathan Langevin
Are there any early release notes available as well, regarding specific new features (high profile or not) that we should pay special attention to, or possible compatibility issues with upgrading from 0.14.x to 1.0 PR, or compatibility issues with any map/reduce functionality, or compatibility with

Re: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-07 Thread Alexander Sicular
Seconded, force-remove. @siculars http://siculars.posterous.com Sent from my rotary phone. On Sep 7, 2011 9:14 PM, "Nicholas Campbell" wrote: > +1 to force-remove. Clear is better than less typing (to a point). > > This sounds great! > > - Nick Campbell > > http://digitaltumbleweed.com > > > On

Re: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-07 Thread Nicholas Campbell
+1 to force-remove. Clear is better than less typing (to a point). This sounds great! - Nick Campbell http://digitaltumbleweed.com On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Joseph Blomstedt wrote: > Given that 1.0 prerelease packages are now available, I wanted to > mention some changes to Riak's clus

Re: Review request: revamped http transport

2011-09-07 Thread Brett Hoerner
Greg, can you make a Github pull request from your branch? It'd be easier to review the commits together (well, git log is easy) but more importantly comment in-line. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a rough first cut of a modified RiakHttpTransport clas

Review request: revamped http transport

2011-09-07 Thread Greg Stein
Hi all, I've got a rough first cut of a modified RiakHttpTransport class. You can review it here: https://github.com/gstein/riak-python-client/commits/newhttp (note that it includes changes from my 'relax-deps' and 'simplify' branches; just look at the most recent commit(s)) This code has bee

Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-07 Thread Joseph Blomstedt
Given that 1.0 prerelease packages are now available, I wanted to mention some changes to Riak's clustering capabilities in 1.0. In particular, there are some subtle semantic differences in the riak-admin commands. More complete docs will be updated in the near future, but I hope a quick email suff

Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-07 Thread David Smith
Hi All, I'm proud to announce that we're taking the first steps towards releasing Riak 1.0 with the creation of the 1.0 branch and initial package builds. With 1.0, we will be doing two series of builds before the final release. The first stage is "pre-release" (aka PR) builds that represent the

Re: Python Riak Search Returning 'NoneType' object

2011-09-07 Thread Ryan Zezeski
What particular version of Search and the Python client are you using? -Ryan On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:24 PM, idmartin wrote: > When querying RiakSearch through the python client i keep getting a > NoneType > object from the get_data() function. It returns the right number of > objects. > I know

Python Riak Search Returning 'NoneType' object

2011-09-07 Thread idmartin
When querying RiakSearch through the python client i keep getting a NoneType object from the get_data() function. It returns the right number of objects. I know this because when I search on cmd line I get 17 objects. The python client is returning 17 NoneType object's. Has anyone else run into th