Yes, that's the plan. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Jonathan Langevin < jlange...@loomlearning.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply :-) > > * > Joe's email was very informative. Might I then suggest that your pre-draft > release notes all be emailed to the list when available (similar to Joe's > email), so that those of us interesting in tinkering with 1.0PR have > relevant info available? If not, that's understandable, but would be quite a > great help otherwise :-D > > <http://www.loomlearning.com/> > Jonathan Langevin > Systems Administrator > Loom Inc. > Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - > www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 > * > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:55 PM, David Smith <diz...@basho.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> We're working on compiling all that and we should have a draft of it out >> in a not too distant PR. It is a fair bit of change, as evidenced by Joe's >> earlier email about clustering (and that's just _one_ area). >> >> MapReduce has undergone a substantial change^H^H^Hrewrite, but we are >> shipping both the old and new versions to avoid major compatibility issues. >> If you upgrade an existing cluster config, it will use the legacy one until >> you explicitly change over to the new one. If you create a new cluster, it >> will start with the new system. >> >> Re: packages, I don't think we'll get included in any distros at this >> time. Maybe later this year if we can find interested maintainers. :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> D. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jonathan Langevin < >> jlange...@loomlearning.com> wrote: >> >>> Are there any early release notes available as well, regarding specific >>> new features (high profile or not) that we should pay special attention to, >>> or possible compatibility issues with upgrading from 0.14.x to 1.0 PR, or >>> compatibility issues with any map/reduce functionality, or compatibility >>> with existing clients? >>> >>> I'm not saying that there are or should be issues, but it seems like a >>> fairly major version jump, so I want to make sure there aren't any "wow, you >>> should've realized X had changed" types of issues :-) >>> >>> Also, any plans for getting the 1.0 final release into package manager >>> repos? (i.e. - apt-get for Debian, for instance) >>> >>> * >>> <http://www.loomlearning.com/> >>> Jonathan Langevin >>> Systems Administrator >>> Loom Inc. >>> Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - >>> www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 >>> * >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:24 PM, David Smith <diz...@basho.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I'm proud to announce that we're taking the first steps towards >>>> releasing Riak 1.0 with the creation of the 1.0 branch and initial >>>> package builds. With 1.0, we will be doing two series of builds before >>>> the final release. >>>> >>>> The first stage is "pre-release" (aka PR) builds that represent the >>>> feature-complete Riak 1.0, with minor cleanup and tweaks still >>>> ongoing. You WILL find some rough edges with packaging and the >>>> features -- we're still working through these and will do pre-releases >>>> as often as necessary to get these issues resolved. We'll also be >>>> trying to incorporate outstanding pull requests where change is >>>> minimal/manageable. >>>> >>>> The second stage is "release candidate" (aka RC) builds that represent >>>> what we believe to be a solid product, suitable for release. Once we >>>> hit this stage, only major, show-stopping bugs will be addressed. >>>> >>>> We would love to get your feedback on these builds, good or bad. We're >>>> trying this new process to do a better job of incorporating community >>>> feedback BEFORE the release. :) If you run into issues, please drop us >>>> a line on the ML or in IRC -- we'll do our best to stay on top of it. >>>> If you'd like to file bugs, we ask you do a check of bugzilla to avoid >>>> creating duplicate issues. Also note that the docs on wiki.basho.com >>>> may still reflect 0.14.2; we'll be addressing those over next few >>>> weeks. >>>> >>>> It goes without saying that you should think twice before running a PR >>>> or RC in production. :) >>>> >>>> So, without further ado: >>>> >>>> http://downloads.basho.com/riak/riak-1.0.0pre1/ >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dave Smith >>>> Director, Engineering >>>> Basho Technologies, Inc. >>>> diz...@basho.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> riak-users mailing list >>>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Smith >> Director, Engineering >> Basho Technologies, Inc. >> diz...@basho.com >> > > -- Dave Smith Director, Engineering Basho Technologies, Inc. diz...@basho.com
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
