[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:04 PM Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrew Newton (andy) > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 2:57 PM > > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > > Cc: ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org ; regext@ietf.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: CALL FO

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Mark Kosters
Hi Scott I support adoption, have reviewed the draft, and look forward to others sharing feedback within regext as well. Mark ARIN On 1/27/25, 3:04 PM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" mailto:40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Newton (andy) mailto:a...@

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > [SAH] I support adoption of this draft, but I do have a concern. As far as I > know, there's not much RPKI expertise in this working group. Do we have the > right people here to develop the draft? Note that there haven't been any >

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hi Scott, From: Hollenbeck, Scott Date: Monday, January 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM To: ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org , regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki [SAH] I support adoption of this draft, but I do have a concern. As far as I know, there's

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 8:28 AM > To: regext > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap- > rpki > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attac

[regext] Re: [IANA #1411725] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai (epp-extensions)

2025-01-27 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: David Dong via RT > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2025 1:13 AM > Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott ; draft-ietf-regext-epp- > eai@ietf.org; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IANA #1411725] expert review for draft-ietf-regext- > epp-eai (epp-extensions) > > Caution: Th

[regext] FW: [IANA #1411725] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai (epp-extensions)

2025-01-27 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
Fellow experts, I need to ask one of you to review and approve the request described below since I'm one of the authors of the draft. Would one of you please confirm that the request to register the extension in IANA's EPP extension registry is valid? David/IANA, I believe it's OK to use the fi

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Newton (andy) > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 2:57 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org ; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips- > regext-rdap-rpki > > Caution: This email o

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> On Jan 27, 2025, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:04 PM Hollenbeck, Scott >> wro

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Jorge Cano
Hi all, I have read the draft and support its adoption. - Jorge Cano LACNIC On 13/01/25 7:28 AM, Antoin Verschuren wrote: Hi all, As discussed during our last meeting, we have some new slots to fill for new documents now that documents on our milestone list are submitted to the IESG. This

[regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki

2025-01-27 Thread Pawel Kowalik
Hi, I am not against adopting this document on the merits of it. Especially if there would be folks joining the WG to support its progress. On the other hand I am concerned the WG has still a lot of WIP drafts, which are having moderate traction. We agreed to have "Extension" draft out of th