On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > [SAH] I support adoption of this draft, but I do have a concern. As far as I > know, there's not much RPKI expertise in this working group. Do we have the > right people here to develop the draft? Note that there haven't been any > expressions of support from anyone else, much less RIR people and/or RPKI > experts. I've already talked to my Verisign colleagues who understand RPKI > better than I do, and we're willing to review text and contribute text as > necessary. I'd very much like to see more expressions of support and interest > in active involvement, though, before the group adopts the draft. >
Are you looking for RPKI experience from the non-RIR wg members? Because I would say nearly all of the active participants of this wg from the RIRs are well-versed in RPKI. And the GitHub comments on the draft show reviews from RPKI experts who don't participate here. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
