> On Jan 27, 2025, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Newton (andy) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:04 PM Hollenbeck, Scott >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Andrew Newton (andy) <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 2:57 PM >>> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips- >>> regext-rdap-rpki >>> >>> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click >>> links >>> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >>> safe. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM Hollenbeck, Scott >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> [SAH] I support adoption of this draft, but I do have a concern. As far as >>>> I >>> know, there's not much RPKI expertise in this working group. Do we have the >>> right people here to develop the draft? Note that there haven't been any >>> expressions of support from anyone else, much less RIR people and/or RPKI >>> experts. I've already talked to my Verisign colleagues who understand RPKI >>> better than I do, and we're willing to review text and contribute text as >>> necessary. I'd very much like to see more expressions of support and >>> interest >>> in active involvement, though, before the group adopts the draft. >>>> >>> >>> Are you looking for RPKI experience from the non-RIR wg members? >>> Because I would say nearly all of the active participants of this wg from >>> the >>> RIRs are well-versed in RPKI. And the GitHub comments on the draft show >>> reviews from RPKI experts who don't participate here. >> >> [SAH] I'm looking for *anyone* who has the experience to review and help >> develop the draft using this working group's processes. I've seen nothing >> from the "active participants of this wg from the RIRs" in response to the >> adoption request, and that concerns me. > > See > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1lknxnwH7CwzOKMJFtBvBeQn44Gm0_R8IKnvGpGF1EDuu2yQ8j1Ntdk3SB1MEzNwgLfdNgOg0vnFVXied2apsWaMJZ9Yov1KApixrCsChUaBpDl5JAqfv5uuq5xqLP-mQ5-Y5uEvxbh5g2Cvd8BI_FWmx-fz4Fow8xg_8KTKowhbt7mu86qAabeY5rQkBAP7PXIBEsA47S0niCqJu5_-JkX2Iz-mkq65GBxYBwSiASaRAC39Tcf_KAsCrzFnhIlWis_llcn9yyP_KtkLXMsegI2WDIEnDGAaCEZc9jLF9hczhspSshTMi70bKEt7IRZgr/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki-01%23name-acknowledgements > > Also, the call for adoption was, like most of them in this wg, "If > there are no objections, the chairs will consider this document > adopted." That doesn’t lessen my concern for the future. I’m glad there have been positive contributions, but I’m hoping that contributions to a WG draft will take place on a WG mailing list.
Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
