On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:04 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Newton (andy) <a...@hxr.us> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 2:57 PM > > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> > > Cc: ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org <i...@antoin.nl>; regext@ietf.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips- > > regext-rdap-rpki > > > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > > links > > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > > safe. > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM Hollenbeck, Scott > > <shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > [SAH] I support adoption of this draft, but I do have a concern. As far > > > as I > > know, there's not much RPKI expertise in this working group. Do we have the > > right people here to develop the draft? Note that there haven't been any > > expressions of support from anyone else, much less RIR people and/or RPKI > > experts. I've already talked to my Verisign colleagues who understand RPKI > > better than I do, and we're willing to review text and contribute text as > > necessary. I'd very much like to see more expressions of support and > > interest > > in active involvement, though, before the group adopts the draft. > > > > > > > Are you looking for RPKI experience from the non-RIR wg members? > > Because I would say nearly all of the active participants of this wg from > > the > > RIRs are well-versed in RPKI. And the GitHub comments on the draft show > > reviews from RPKI experts who don't participate here. > > [SAH] I'm looking for *anyone* who has the experience to review and help > develop the draft using this working group's processes. I've seen nothing > from the "active participants of this wg from the RIRs" in response to the > adoption request, and that concerns me.
See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki-01#name-acknowledgements Also, the call for adoption was, like most of them in this wg, "If there are no objections, the chairs will consider this document adopted." -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
