It appears that Q Misell said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>> If DSYNC is an attribute of the registrars and resellers, then that could
>be a use case for the Organization EPP RFCs.
>
>I'm hesitant to tie technical properties to legal relationships in this
>way. One legal entity may have very good reasons for
> If DSYNC is an attribute of the registrars and resellers, then that could
be a use case for the Organization EPP RFCs.
I'm hesitant to tie technical properties to legal relationships in this
way. One legal entity may have very good reasons for multiple DSYNC servers.
> Also, a registrar could h
It appears that Q Misell said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>> You would only need an EPP extension in the scenario where different
>domains under the sponsorship of the same registrar would need different
>DSYNC information.
>
>This would very much be the case with resellers, or even a registrar using
>one IC
"regext@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: [Ext] DSYNC in EPP
Correct, the resellers would want to use it this way and likely they are not
reflected in the data model of a registry.
DENIC is using such approach for General Contact/Abuse Contact where either
registrar default set
Correct, the resellers would want to use it this way and likely they are
not reflected in the data model of a registry.
DENIC is using such approach for General Contact/Abuse Contact where
either registrar default setting applies or a specific one can be
assigned for the domain through the pro
> You would only need an EPP extension in the scenario where different
domains under the sponsorship of the same registrar would need different
DSYNC information.
This would very much be the case with resellers, or even a registrar using
one ICANN accreditation for multiple somewhat operationally
> On 30 Jul 2024, at 08:13, Q Misell wrote:
>
> Moin,
>
> There has been work recently in DNSOP on Generalised DNS Notifications
> (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-02.html
> [ietf.org]).
> This draft is mostly targeted at CDS/CDNSKEY, but is general to oth
