There are a couple EPP Extension RFCs that may be of use with the Organization Mapping in RFC 8543 and Organization Extension in RFC 8544 that do support the definition and linkage of multiple organization types to registry objects, such as Resellers and DNS Providers. The Organization Mapping could also be used to provision registrar information and since it’s an EPP object, it can be extended with a command response extension for attributes like DSYNC. If DSYNC is an attribute of the registrars and resellers, then that could be a use case for the Organization EPP RFCs.
-- JG [cid87442*image001.png@01D960C5.C631DA40] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com> 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/> From: "kowa...@denic.de" <kowa...@denic.de> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 6:12 AM To: Q Misell <q=40as207960....@dmarc.ietf.org>, Gavin Brown <gavin.br...@icann.org> Cc: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: [Ext] DSYNC in EPP Correct, the resellers would want to use it this way and likely they are not reflected in the data model of a registry. DENIC is using such approach for General Contact/Abuse Contact where either registrar default setting applies or a specific one can be assigned for the domain through the provisioning protocol. If an EPP extension is to be drafted I would rather generalise it to support more than just DSYNC. In the DELEG WG discussion there is also a proposal of example._deleg.com. 3600 IN SVCB … [1] The use case of registrar/reseller discovery will be also very interesting for Domain Connect. A TXT Record like example._domainconnect.com. can potentially be an answer. I would be happy to work on this draft. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/120/materials/slides-120-deleg-not-at-the-zone-cut<https://secure-web.cisco.com/15FbRe5fpRvlrkkAq0HkR-BPdonBYPdJ1OdxjUMtXaldWy9CK6PKxzuPBfeK_iwa3DkCNRFim9k2m8hxPU3a_SfTjNu4bRyTTyHmfoZMa_T_a5PLaHngENA44Sj6naTkbL90wAdN_BnHNGdSBhg40tz9azdIZgVCk0rI0JisrzXsG0sUOhqN5cHVfx__QTi3V91E3rigZuY7qnd1P-ALesfY8T9z2CUcwOukdMl2bEa0J1LOIqeq5vacoe7xTDuHG-vLScKO2TiJg3k5ekgBq3Q5rToH8MQsfZKsTNohYhZA/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fmeeting%2F120%2Fmaterials%2Fslides-120-deleg-not-at-the-zone-cut> Kind Regards, Pawel On 30.07.24 10:09, Q Misell wrote: > You would only need an EPP extension in the scenario where different domains > under the sponsorship of the same registrar would need different DSYNC > information. This would very much be the case with resellers, or even a registrar using one ICANN accreditation for multiple somewhat operationally distinct brands.
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
