It appears that Q Misell <q...@as207960.net> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >> If DSYNC is an attribute of the registrars and resellers, then that could >be a use case for the Organization EPP RFCs. > >I'm hesitant to tie technical properties to legal relationships in this >way. One legal entity may have very good reasons for multiple DSYNC servers. > >> Also, a registrar could handle the provisioning update stuff itself and >then tell the reseller about it rather than expecting each reseller to >create its own DNSSEC update logic. > >I think this just creates unnecessary complexity, and requires a registrar >to support any updates to DSYNC etc before a reseller can.
I would flip it around -- the registrar can implement the updates once and the resellers all get it for free. In my limited experience, domain resellers do not typically have a lot of DNS expertise. I'm sure a few do, but most are just packaging domains with web sites and other stuff where DNS is not their main skill. R's, John _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
