Correct, the resellers would want to use it this way and likely they are not reflected in the data model of a registry.

DENIC is using such approach for General Contact/Abuse Contact where either registrar default setting applies or a specific one can be assigned for the domain through the provisioning protocol.

If an EPP extension is to be drafted I would rather generalise it to support more than just DSYNC.

In the DELEG WG discussion there is also a proposal of example._deleg.com. 3600 IN SVCB … [1]

The use case of registrar/reseller discovery will be also very interesting for Domain Connect. A TXT Record like example._domainconnect.com. can potentially be an answer.

I would be happy to work on this draft.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/120/materials/slides-120-deleg-not-at-the-zone-cut

Kind Regards,

Pawel

On 30.07.24 10:09, Q Misell wrote:
> You would only need an EPP extension in the scenario where different domains under the sponsorship of the same registrar would need different DSYNC information.

This would very much be the case with resellers, or even a registrar using one ICANN accreditation for multiple somewhat operationally distinct brands.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to