Hi,
I'm running RedHat 6.x on a PC here at work. I can log in locally
but not over a telnet connection. I was able to previously and don't think
I have changed any of the configuration for this machine. Since it is only
for testing, I haven't had any reason to worry about it being compr
> hosts.deny is
> set to deny an IP that person logging in will usually get
> connection refused
> so it may not be that either. I wonder if something has
> changed in pam.d to
> cause this. What does /var/log/messages and /var/log/secure say on the
> machine at work when you try this?
type whoami at the prompt. It
> will come back as
> root or the user you logged in as or the user that you
> changed to with su.
>
>
> Eddie Strohmier
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tanner, Robby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: &
ll, you should find the
> answer there...
>
> Eddie Strohmier
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tanner, Robby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:55 PM
> Subject: RE: Cannot Telnet to Serve
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Hardowa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 1:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux is More Secure than NT? Prove It.
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > I believe companies of alternative operating syst
If you talking about running an X-Session via XWin32 or something like that,
than yes I have. It's really easy and really slick.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Carreiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: XDCMP for
ix it?
>
> Chad
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 5:40 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: XDCMP for Linux?
>
>
> If you talking about r
You can get Sleeman's in any major centre in Canada. We even have it in the
"bald" prairies.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Forrister [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT - beers] (was: Re: name of curren
Do a search from google.com or the like. Also, try the vendor website and
check the Redhat mail archive list for possible insight.
> -Original Message-
> From: Penelope L. McFadin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 9:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sc
According to
http://www.infocom.cqu.edu.au/Units/aut2000/85321/Resources/Lectures/2000/10
/21/index.html there is a 4TB limit on ext2 partitions and a 2GB size limit
on files.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:53
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: large filesystem under Linux
>
>
> "Tanner, Robby" wrote:
>
> > According to
> >
> http://www.infocom.cqu.edu.au/Units/aut2000/85321/Resources/Le
> ctures/2000/10
> > /21/index.html there is a 4TB limit on ext
There is GIMP and Dia for diagramming. Dia claims to be a good replacement
for Visio. Haven't tried it myself though.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Network diagram tool?
You want to connect to the computers through the firewall, right? If so,
the HOW-TO you are looking for involves VPN's (or Virtual Private Networks).
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Hirsch [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 8:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
If you're doing this programmatically, you can spawn a child
process, before the creating process exits, to hold the data and connect to
it using various IPC methods. Orphaned child processes are adopted by the
O/S (at least for UNIX, I'm assuming Linux would do the same).
Alterna
Point well taken. What you want to do is set up a VPN if you need
web-access to external files.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vidiot [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Need Linux Web Server
>
> >2) Allows me f
There is a utility called bootpart that allows you to put Linux as one of
the options in the NT boot loader.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael S. Dunsavage [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: NT and Linux
>
Granted, it would be nuts NOT to have boot and rescue floppies for
all the O/S's on your multi-boot machine. However, the bootpart process
mentioned previously I have used without incident. There is a mini how-to
available on dual booting NT + Linux.
> -Original Message-
> From:
How long did it take? Your idea of "some time" may not be someone else's.
I, personally had no troubles with it. If one reads over the associated
info, they will find that this is not difficult. It takes, maybe 10 minutes
once you've got it figured out, unless of course you have complicated the
utarlier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 3:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: NT and Linux
>
>
> Could you point out the advantages to use this method instead
> of using lilo ?
>
> Philippe
>
>
> "Tanner,
gree with you boot loaders are similar. It all depends on what
> one already knows and is comfortable with. I chose NT Loader becuase I
> knew
> how NT load DOS, and figured Linux could be loaded the same way.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tanner, Robby" &
Should you not be able to write a service that uses the NetRemoteTOD API
call? Is the time syncing to be done in a heterogeneous environment
(Linux/WinNT/Novell) etc?
I remember the initial question, but what are everyone's requirements? I'd
like to write a generic little something that does it
Is NTP the so-called "Time of Day" service (I think on Port 7)?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Time syncing
>
> "Tanner, Robb
I would like to showcase the advantage of using a cluster in
presentation form. This would also present the concept of distributed,
enterprise applications. I can work up the presentation side myself, but I
would like to come up with (or use an existing) example that would
demonstrate th
But a group of P-75's should be able to hold their own shouldn't they?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacques Gelinas [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 4:01 PM
> To: Tanner, Robby
> Subject: RE: clusters
>
> On Fri, 2
Please double-check the linux-ha.org address. I couldn't seem to open it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 6:35 PM
> To: John Catral
> Subject: Re: PC clustering question
>
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, John Catr
Furthermore, just TRY "swapping" a PCI and an ISA card. Just try it, I dare
ya'.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ward William E PHDN [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 12:21 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Dual eth question - changing eth0 & eth1
>
My uncle works for a potash mining company. One of their linux file servers
has a 100GB HD with 1GB of RAM.
That was at least a year ago. Probably, you can get more RAM and larger
drives by now, but that's the largest setup I know of.
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Walters [SMTP:[E
I didn't find dual booting Linux and NT4 difficult.
Have you heard of bootpart? There is a mini-HOWTO for it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Darryl Harvey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 8:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Linux and Win2k
>
> Anyone
;
> Subject: RE: Maximum hd size
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > My uncle works for a potash mining company. One of their linux file
> servers
> > has a 100GB HD with 1GB of RAM.
> > That was at least a year ago. Probably, you can get more
Yup. It's called a cross-over cable and it is the same one used to connect
(or cascade) hubs together. You should be able to find one at a computer
shop if you don't fancy making one yourself.
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnnio [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 200
Hi there,
I would like to add my voice to that ever-increasing chorus of
newbies with "I'm just trying my first install".
I require that it been done over the LAN (NFS, FTP, HTTP, doesn't
matter) due to their being no CD-ROM. I used rawrite to create a floppy of
bootnet.im
I would take this a step further and recommend to any first-timer that you
purchase an official distribution, Suse, Caldera, Mandrake, Red Hat,
Slackware (the list goes on). For the few dollars of outlay it can save a
lot of headaches that might otherwise turn you off the O/S.
> -Original Me
This doens't happen in Windows? If so, it is likely an external factor.
You may want to try a different physical location and see if it is being
caused by excessive EMI.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 9:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
I am having the same problem, so if anyone has a solution...
-Original Message-
From: Gustav Schaffter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 4:48 AM
To: redhat-list (Mailing list)
Subject: Elink III (short version)
Hi,
I recently posted a long(!) problem concerning
What format should the driver be in?
Is it adequate to format a floppy with ext2fs, than drop driver.o on it?
-Original Message-
From: Mikkel L. Ellertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: "Drivers disk"???
At 09:46 PM
There is a very elegant solution that was described in the December '99
issue of the Linux journal (article: "MultiFax". It describes a system for
creating "a Windows broadcast fax system with web-based administration using
Linux".
Some relevant sites:
for the latest version of mgetty+sendfax:
I lost an NTFS partition on a 2 hard drive machine, at least I lost the
entry to it in the partition table. I had a hard time recovering it with
the Windows tech doc on repairing a corrupt partition table. Enter Linux,
and a great little utility called gpart (the "g" stands for "guess"). I
boot
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, try gpart from freshmeat. It
recovered a lost NTFS partition for me. I was very happy.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Schernau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 9:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Partiti
For getting things lined up, you could consider Microsoft FrontPage. Once
you get things formatted, open your HTML in Linux and add the other stuff
from there.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 4:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One combination I have found in wide use is the Apache web server using PHP
and MySQL.
> -Original Message-
> From: JRtL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 12:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: alumni registry - web database?
>
>
> hi,
>
> i have a schoo
How about rlogin?
> -Original Message-
> From: Philippe Moutarlier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 10:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ethernet commands
>
>
> "Billy R. Nordyke Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Where do I find the commands to v
freshmeat.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Chad W. Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 6:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Lilo not loading properly
>
>
> I should have mentioned this, but this was the second time I tried to
> install the system
I don't care who you work for (within reason). No one deserves to have
their lives threatened by terrorists. "got what they deserve" is a little
strong. If one of these security guards had been killed, would you be
saying the same thing? How would you justify such a position? We shouldn't
let
"Jumping on the guy with both feet in public is hardly any better, is it?"
I'd go as far as to assert that it is in fact a little better. It's pretty
simple, the one who isn't supporting the use of terrorism is right. Not a
lot of confusing variables in that equation. If, in the future, this c
There is no chuckle derived from terrorism. You claim someone "deserved"
it. Who would that be? The building? Microsoft? You have to be wary of
being too glib when comment on events such as these, particularly in an
email where the only tone others get from it, comes from what you have said.
Ridiculous? Wrong. The statement implies (without too much interpretation)
that Microsoft buildings "deserve" to have explosions set off near them. If
you can explain the difference between that and promoting terrorism, feel
free. Otherwise, since it IS off topic, I'm eager to let it drop also
I haven't tried this put there is an article in the December 1999 Linux
journal for Multifax.
Required is
mgetty+sendfax (http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/serial/getty).
Respond program (http://www.boerde.de/~horstf)
Note: While you're there pick up printfax.pl and smb.conf entry for Sa
In fact, Microsoft did its level best to downplay the internet before it
really took off. Kind of silly in hindsight, mind you, I am using
hindsight.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Canary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 5:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
As an aside, it should read "Is RedHat actually providing support?".
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Lee Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Are RedHat actually providing support?
>
>
> I've had no trouble
failure to acknowledge the number of
a noun.
Similarly, this debate is way off-topic...
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Dyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 8:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Are RedHat actually providing support?
"Red and Hat, Inc" falls in that grey area such as "The Rolling Stones" etc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Dyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 1:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Are RedHat actually providing support?
> I agree, and upon further r
...and one could hypothesize that, given a different outcome, we would be
complianing about Apple today. The possibilities and liklihoods
notwithstanding, Microsoft undertakes shady and illegal activities to
compensate for a so-so operating system. Truth be known, I get along with
NT. I prefer
; I was on the road. Windows does not give us anything that special.
>
> Again Gates has nothing more to do with windows then he had
> some great marketing. He did not
> even write it. At least Mac was done by them..
>
> ******* REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 6/
Let's not forget that:
1) Gates also tried to downplay the internet, mainly because it was beyond
the control of the Microsoft business model.
2) at one point Willy G. quipped that you would never need more than 640KB
of memory. Ironic, coming from the man whose bloatware is probably
supporting
Leaving the PC on, particulaly with today's advanced power management
features, lowers the total cost of ownership (TCO). One of the largest
areas of failure is caused by hardware. Of those, a large percent can be
attributed to bad solder joints. This occurs due to thermal fatigue
introduced by
Try gpart from http://freshmeat.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 4:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Urgent Help - to recover damaged partition
>
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I installed MSWindows98 and RH6.2 in th
You don't need an RHCE. You need a network security expert. Try
securityfocus.com, etc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel A. Camacho Q. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 11:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: I've Been Framed
>
>
> Steven Pierce wrot
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 8:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: I've Been Framed
>
>
> I suggest that you look up the laws/ordinances of your State
> (what state are
> you in, by the way?)
>
> -take
Whatever. So's the death penalty, the draft etc
> -Original Message-
> From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 2:16 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: I've Been Framed
>
>
> And the wonderful part of the forfieture law is that it'
Unfortunately we are in a world where people spend a lot of time arguing
about the law, and not enough about justice. If the guy proves it wasn't
him. It is only right that he get his damn computer back. Far too much
energy goes into finding a way of doing things within the construct of our
cur
Shame on you. This is a wee bit of hoax.
See:
http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/jesus.html
for details.
> -Original Message-
> From: **Texas_Angel** **Georgia_Peach**
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 7:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fwd: Read thi
Dear
The Vo,
A
couple of things are gonna' make your life easier on the web. One is to
remove any cutsie formatting (i.e. whatever this background
colour is, tope?) from your emails. The second is to more thoroughly
read your documentation. When you first subscribed to this list, no do
1) It's Robby, not Roddy.
2) Perhaps you should check the definition of caustic before bandying it
about. My comments were perhaps not couched in complimentary language, but
it wasn't corrosive or sarcastic as the term implies either. They were
inert and instructive.
3) The reason for the HTM
Title: RE: Dual Boot for Linux RH and Windows NT
You
will also want a boot loader. I use Bootpart with LILO. There
are others, but this one has worked for me.
Regards,
Rob
-Original Message-From: Brad Bonkoski
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:25
I am running RH6.0 on an older P75 with two network cards.
The internal card ip/subnet is: 204.112.40.3/255.255.255.0
External card ip/subnet is: 24.68.176.193 255.255.255.0
I am also using Squid 2.2.STABLE4-5 installed from the rpm.
We also have another router on for our WAN at 204.112.40.200
ore likely.
Finally, let me say that I am still somewhat uninitiated with respect to
both Linux and this level of TCP/IP networking, so if some of the questions
seem a bit stupid please be patient. I'll get it sorted out in time.
Cheers and thanks,
Robby Tanner
-
To recap:
I have a P-75 with RH6.0 running IPCHAINS and SQUID.
I am trying to get some simple routing up.
The adapters are configured as follows:
(Internet) External Card: 24.68.176.193 (gateway 24.68.176.1)
(LAN) Internal Card: 204.112.40.3
I have an NT workstation with it's default gateway s
E: More Firewall Problems
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tanner, Robby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:49 PM
> > To: 'Linux (LOSURS Q&A)'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Linux Group
> > (Saskatoon)'
> >
Wait a minute, I think I failed to mention that I am connected via cable
modem to the internet, so my default gateway on the Linux box is
24.68.176.1, while for the LAN it is 204.112.40.3. Does this change things?
My "external" card is not directly connected to the internet, but is routed
through
ig
> /sbin/route
> /sbin/ipchains -L (just the masq rules)
>
> With this info we should be better able to help.
>
> Drew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24
setup at home. I have a firewall box directly
> connected to the internet through a cable modem.
>
> Heman
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001
I want to upgrade to the lastest version (1.3.9-x) but am a little uncertain
regarding which RPM I should use. I am using RH6.0 with kernel 2.2.16-3.
I tried the ipchains-1.3.9-17.src.rpm but received "error:
ipchains-1.3.9-17.src.rpm does not appear to be a RPM package" when I ran
rpm -ivh on i
I have nothing specific to offer except to suggest that you check XF86's
website for docs and possibly a newslist (if you haven't already). The
originators of the system should be the first stop for problems.
Look through your local NNTP server for newsgroups with ".x".
Hope this might help you
Hello,
I got ipchains and forwarding working nicely together and am
currently working on a set of rules for the firewall. I am planning on
submitting a list of these rules to the lists in the hopes that some of you
will review and comment on them.
Effectively, we now have two rout
Okey-dokey. I have a linux router/firewall set up in our Saskatoon office.
The logons seem to take a little long so I was wondering if I could speed it
up through some sort of redirection (i.e. anything coming in on port 137-139
sent to WAN router?). We have an NT PDC.
Also, some of the Win9x c
I had seen a web page not to long ago that listed applications known to work
through ipchains. I think it also contained a little blurb on how to let
them through.
Specifically, I would like to know the mimimum requirement to let pcAnywhere
out of our system. In the long term though, it would b
ure someone is really coming from where
> they say they
> are...
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Tanner, Robby [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:31 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Linux Grou
In the ipchains HowTo, it mentions that source address verification can be
turned using a little script. This apparently eliminates IP spoofing
without having to write specific rules for IPChains. As a relative
new-comer, I am looking for some feedback regarding this. Should I or
should I not h
've really done a lot to that page since my last visit!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Ashe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:31 PM
> > To: Tanner, Robby
> > Subject:Re: Applications through firewa
According to the HOWTO, all I need to do is echo "1" >
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter to enable source address verification
(see page 38).
"The best way to protect from IP spoofing is called Source Address
Verification, and it is done by the routing code, and not firewalling at
all."
__
I have the following in my log file.
Feb 2 03:37:23 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
202.64.65.202:1619 24.68.176.193:98 L=60 S=0x00 I=41281 F=0x4000 T=45 SYN
(#12)
Feb 2 03:37:26 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
202.64.65.202:1619 24.68.176.193:98 L=
Well, I just found the following lines in the log and shut down my server.
What caused this?
Why would 204.112.40.3 being trying to connect to itself?
Feb 2 14:53:07 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY lo PROTO=6
204.112.40.
3:1026 204.112.40.3:21 L=60 S=0x00 I=13145 F=0x4000 T=64 SYN (#12
Hello all,
I am looking for feedback on the various versions of SSH.
Specifically, I would like a comparison of the commercial vs free version(s)
wrt functionality, security, stability and ease of configuration/deployment.
Regards,
Rob
___
Re
Hi all,
I have an IPCHAINS firewall set up and am a little curious about
ip_masq_raudio. I loaded the module with modprobe and was able to get
streaming video. When I tried to remove the module, it was busy until I
left the streaming video page (so far, so good right?). I unloaded the
m
I moved my firewall which required a reboot.
I found the following line in my log, and my firewall does not seem to work.
Feb 19 17:46:18 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY lo PROTO=1
24.68.176.193:3 24.68.176.193:1 L=132 S=0xC0 I=4058 F=0x T=255 (#13)
What could be wrong? Why is
I am using IPCHAINS and IPMASQ to provide internet access to our
LAN. I am sure you've all seen THIS before. The windows FTP clients are
having a difficult time retrieving the folder listing. I have the
ip_masq_ftp loaded but I am still getting the following log messages:
"
Feb 19 11:1
For starters, I would recommend purchasing a hub. All your LAN PC's are on
the same subnet, so you don't need to run the configuration below. You can
get the architecture to work, but it just doesn't follow, for lack of a
better term, common practice. The sort of setup you show is often used,
w
ject: Re: FTP Through Firewall
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > I am using IPCHAINS and IPMASQ to provide internet access to our
> > LAN. I am sure you've all seen THIS before. The windows
> FTP clients are
> > having a difficult ti
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Curious Log Entries
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > I moved my firewall which required a reboot.
> >
> > I found the following line in my log, and my firewall does
> not seem to work.
> >
>
Agreed, but while we're making a wish list, it would be nice if people would
read the FAQ's, HOWTO's and search the archives before posting questions
too. No offence intended, I'm guilty too :)
Closing the loop with the solution would actually make the archives more
valuable.
> -Original M
Yup.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Dekkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FTP Through Firewall
>
>
> > I am using WS_FTP LE.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rob
>
> Have you tried with a passive (PASV) connectio
; check out the firewall script at http://tomii.erols.com/firewall.txt
>
> The ftp to the server is disallowed, but ws_ftp works fine on
> my windows
> box.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tanner, Robby [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monda
Great, thanks.
I'll let you know how things turn out.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikkel L. Ellertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:56 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: FTP Through Firewall
>
>
> O
Good idea.
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Glover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1116 - 17 msgs
>
>
> Maybe you should see what rule #13 in the input chain is. From your
>
Strange, it works with ACTIVE transfers quite nicely. Passive transfers are
failing.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Tanner, Robby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:03 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Redhat-list dige
;
>
> Did you "insmod ip_masq_ftp" ?
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > I am using IPCHAINS and IPMASQ to provide internet access to our
> > LAN. I am sure you've all seen THIS before. The windows
>
setup
> before. A few of
> them. Now I want to do a bit more "advanced" setup. I'm just
> asking, is it
> possible to use the linux box as a switch. And wondering if I
> got my routing
> right.
>
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
>
> "Tanner,
Easy now. While I agree with you, it seems a bit agressive. Remember, most
of us here are Linux advocates. At the same time, I don't want to see yet
another MS vs Linux debate. The fact that we're on this list means we must
have already heard one or two.
I don't like the concept that we have
Is that the case even when you choose Linux as the O/S?
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Herman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ibm's (very real) commitment to linux And Dell
>
>
> Warren Melnick wrote:
> >
to pay Redmond regardless of whether they
> ship a Windoze O/S or not. I think a sales person actually admitted
> that to me when I called a few months ago.
>
> But what do I know?
>
>
>
>
> "Tanner, Robby" wrote:
> >
> > Is that the case e
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
