SMTP AUTH on rh 7.0

2001-02-05 Thread sixx
Just some queries. Anybody tried smtp auth on the sendmail with rh 7.0? Any comments on enabling it for mobile users? How about using smtp auth on a different server from the popper? best regards, sixx ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: : /etc/inetd.conf

2001-02-05 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 5/02/01 at 22:09 Aaron wrote: >Is it possible for a redhat install to be missing inetd.conf? I just >installed samba and the docs I am reading tell me to edit the inetd.conf >file, only I can't find it on the system. Does anyone know what might have

Re: Evaluating SSH

2001-02-05 Thread Greg Wright
Support OpenSSH Being open in Security areas is more important IMHO than some other areas, the more people looking and using the better, also it covers more than one alogorithm & does both 1 & 2 protocols, in a nutshell you need nothing else! Also the guys behind the project have a reputation of

Beta problems?

2001-02-05 Thread Rodney Fulk
Just curious before I get on bugzilla or something bout the beta red Hat... Has anyone else sucessfully used WVDIAL to dial up their ISP? I try and It logs me in, notices the PPP handshaking then last message is "enabling PPP" or whatever that message is.. With 7.0 I recall getting some IP and DNS

Re: DNS named permissions

2001-02-05 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 5/02/01 at 18:28 David Brett wrote: >I have finally got two DNS servers up and working. One being a slave of >the first. Unfortunately the updates are not happening. The logs tend to >indicate the problem is with permissions. The error message in

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hey David... I know we tried to fix this once before but your key still >gives me trouble... *nod* I remember ... it's a 2048-bit RSA key, it's self-signed, and I can't reproduce the error, I'm afraid. I still need to find time to se

Re: /etc/inetd.conf

2001-02-05 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:09:45PM -0800, Aaron wrote: > Is it possible for a redhat install to be missing inetd.conf? I just > installed samba and the docs I am reading tell me to edit the inetd.conf > file, only I can't find it on the system. Does anyone know what might have > happened with the

Re: /etc/inetd.conf

2001-02-05 Thread Hidong Kim
Try to "find" it: find / -name "*inetd.conf*" -print | more Good luck, Hidong Aaron wrote: > > Is it possible for a redhat install to be missing inetd.conf? I just > installed samba and the docs I am reading tell me to edit the inetd.conf > file, only I can't find it on the system. Does

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread chuck
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, David Talkington spewed into the bitstream: DT>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DT> DT>>On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Vidiot spewed into the bitstream: DT> DT>>V>It is called confirmation e-mail. DT>> DT>>If you know the answer then why in the hell did you ask the damn DT>>question? DT> DT>Git

Re: Funny

2001-02-05 Thread Steven Pierce
\ So true.. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 2/5/2001 at 22:01 Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >Hi Steven, > >> http://bbspot.com/News/2000/6/php_suspend.html > > Have a coke and a smile ;-). > > Bye, > > Leon

Re: Evaluating SSH

2001-02-05 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Bret Hughes wrote: >"Tanner, Robby" wrote: >> I am looking for feedback on the various versions of SSH. >> Specifically, I would like a comparison of the commercial vs free version(s) >> wrt functionality, security, stability and ease of configuration/d

/etc/inetd.conf

2001-02-05 Thread Aaron
Is it possible for a redhat install to be missing inetd.conf? I just installed samba and the docs I am reading tell me to edit the inetd.conf file, only I can't find it on the system. Does anyone know what might have happened with the file? thanks, Aaron __

Re: (no subject) [spam alert]

2001-02-05 Thread Bret Hughes
Ding Lei wrote: > Why you all do not believe that and no one want to help me?why? > Do everyone of you thought that I do not have the ability to write an OS? > But when Linux was written,no one knows that it will be so good today. > Any comments or advice about new os will be appreciated! I beli

Re: (no subject)

2001-02-05 Thread A Brady
On Monday 05 February 2001 21:56, Ding Lei opined: > Now I am thinking writing a new Operating System(Open source > software),which is more stable thank linux,and easy to use as > windows,and the most important one,is that > it is binary or source compatible with any unix or linux or windows > app

Linux Portslave fails to authenticate through radius

2001-02-05 Thread Raul S. Bucad
Hi, I'm new to portslave and I have just installed it on my Redhat 6.1 yestarday. I have added a serial modem on ttys1 and my problem is when i dial the modem it receives the call but it drops the connection when it is loging in. I have portslave 1.2.0 pre 6 version installed. And one mo

Re: Funny

2001-02-05 Thread Vineeta
Good fun! PHP- drugs??!! haha. :-) Cheers, Vineeta Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Steven, > > > http://bbspot.com/News/2000/6/php_suspend.html > > Have a coke and a smile ;-). > > Bye, > > Leon

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread Vidiot
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Vidiot spewed into the bitstream: > >>V>It is called confirmation e-mail. >> >>If you know the answer then why in the hell did you ask the damn >>question? > >Git 'im, Chuck. =) >David Talkington If you followed the rest of the postings, you'll s

Re: Lets get the mail footer changed [comments]

2001-02-05 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Statux wrote: >Also, something based on UNIX with the prettiness of Windows = BeOS. On that note, I admit I was captivated by my first (and only, and brief) exposure to Mac OS X ... finally, a computer for geeks AND their grandparents! ... -d - -- David Ta

Re: (no subject) [spam alert]

2001-02-05 Thread Hidong Kim
Valiant notion, but your skills may contribute more if you worked on improving Linux. Ding Lei wrote: > > Why you all do not believe that and no one want to help me?why? > Do everyone of you thought that I do not have the ability to write an OS? > But when Linux was written,no one knows that

Re: (no subject) [spam alert]

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ding Lei wrote: > Why you all do not believe that and no one want to help me?why? > Do everyone of you thought that I do not have the ability to write an OS? > But when Linux was written,no one knows that it will be so good today. > Any comments or advice about new os will be

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Vidiot spewed into the bitstream: >V>It is called confirmation e-mail. > >If you know the answer then why in the hell did you ask the damn >question? Git 'im, Chuck. =) - -- David Talkington Prairienet [EMAIL P

Re: Evaluating SSH

2001-02-05 Thread Bret Hughes
"Tanner, Robby" wrote: > Hello all, > I am looking for feedback on the various versions of SSH. > Specifically, I would like a comparison of the commercial vs free version(s) > wrt functionality, security, stability and ease of configuration/deployment. I have been extremely pleased with

Re: (no subject) [spam alert]

2001-02-05 Thread Ding Lei
Why you all do not believe that and no one want to help me?why? Do everyone of you thought that I do not have the ability to write an OS? But when Linux was written,no one knows that it will be so good today. Any comments or advice about new os will be appreciated!

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread Bret Hughes
Vidiot wrote: > > You need to get a clue as well, and note what I said. I wasn't correcting, > I was pointing out the difference, which you seemed to have ignored. > > >...and two more things... it's not a weird method they chose... it's the > >right one... I've seen you do this same crap to ot

Re: Redhat 6.2 RPM upgrade

2001-02-05 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
On 6 Feb 2001, Rupert Heesom wrote: > On 04 Feb 2001 16:32:42 -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM > > > database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. > > > > Red Hat

Re: Redhat 6.2 RPM upgrade

2001-02-05 Thread Rupert Heesom
On 04 Feb 2001 16:32:42 -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM > > database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. > > Red Hat Linux 7 also includes newer version og glibc and

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, lee johnson wrote: > > (I hope it understands ASCII.) > > Try "cat /etc/lilo.conf > /dev/lp0". > > it does ascii just fine as i've had this printer working before no > issuesgraphics/text done deal..:) > > well.I don't know what i may have done to my poor linuxbox :)

Re: regular expression scripts,

2001-02-05 Thread John H Darrah
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Andrew So Hing-pong wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask a question about regular expression & patten > matching on the script writting. > > test.sh > ... > if [ $1 != "v[0-9][0-9].[0-9][0-9].[0-9][0-9]" ] ; then >echo "Version must be vXX.XX.XX where X be a digit" >

RPM

2001-02-05 Thread Ray Curtis
I should know the answer to this but can't remember. For some reason my copy of rpm during a upgrade of redhat 6.2-7.0 got corrupted and now I can't install do a install of the new rpm. I get a segfault everytime I try using rpm, there used to be a doc on this at redhat but I can't find it tonigh

Re: E-Mail question

2001-02-05 Thread John H Darrah
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Enrico Payne wrote: > So, to those who value their own privacy, while on company > time and company property (including PC's and Internet > access), Bah. If I can reduce the risk of future exposure > to viruses by blocking or deleting attachments that could > contain viruses,

Re: Lets get the mail footer changed

2001-02-05 Thread Chris Harvey
any chance we can ignore this troll for what it is folks? - Original Message - From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 11:29 PM Subject: Re: Lets get the mail footer changed > On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ding Lei wrote: > > > Hi ev

Re: Lets get the mail footer changed

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ding Lei wrote: > Hi everybody, > Now I am thinking writing a new Operating System(Open source software),which > is more stable as linux,and easy to use as windows,and the most important > one,is that > No errors. > if anyone is interesting,please write to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: DHCP error - Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use

2001-02-05 Thread Chris Harvey
> Your second subnet section is wrong. Is it in there for a reasion? > This may be where your error is comming from. You do not want the > subnet from your public IP in the file. Chop out the last two lines, > and it should work. I use a different format, but it looks close. > > Mikkel I tri

Re: Banging on the firewall

2001-02-05 Thread Asoka Anon
John Aldrich wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, you wrote: > > Ya, that too ;) > > > > of course, modify the subnets to match your particular problems :) > > > Well, the nice thing about my system is that unless you *know* I'm here, you > can't find me! :-) I don't answer to any of the standard port

Re: DHCP error - Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Burger
Another stupid question...did you kill -HUP the dhcpd after making the change? On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Chris Harvey wrote: > I wondered that.. > > > Is it possible that one of the addresses you've assigned for DHCP > > assignment is in use on another box? > > > > I did have the DHCP range as 10.1.1.

Re: DHCP error - Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Chris Harvey wrote: > I wondered that.. > > > Is it possible that one of the addresses you've assigned for DHCP > > assignment is in use on another box? > > > > I did have the DHCP range as 10.1.1.10 - 10.1.1.100 and I had another > machine on the Network using the 10.1.1.10 a

Re: (no subject)

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ding Lei wrote: > Now I am thinking writing a new Operating System(Open source software),which > is more stable thank linux,and easy to use as > windows,and the most important one,is that > it is binary or source compatible with any unix or linux or windows > application > if

Re: (no subject) [spam alert]

2001-02-05 Thread Statux
Ok.. now this is getting to be spam. You've replaced "No errors" with the DOS problem of binary compatability with all systems. You know what that yields? Viruses. And yes, I am interesting (as opposed to interested). Enough. On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ding Lei wrote: > Now I am thinking writing a ne

(no subject)

2001-02-05 Thread Ding Lei
Now I am thinking writing a new Operating System(Open source software),which is more stable thank linux,and easy to use as windows,and the most important one,is that it is binary or source compatible with any unix or linux or windows application if anyone is interesting,please write [EMAIL PROTE

Re: regular expression scripts,

2001-02-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 12:06:09AM +0800, Andrew So Hing-pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I would like to ask a question about regular expression & patten | matching on the script writting. | | test.sh | ... | if [ $1 != "v[0-9][0-9].[0-9][0-9].[0-9][0-9]" ] ; then |echo "Version must be vX

Re: Lets get the mail footer changed [comments]

2001-02-05 Thread Statux
More stable than Linux? Alright. Easy to use as Windows? If you call yer system freezing all the time, having it act like a veggie, and not doing what it should be doing, then you have problems :) And no errors, eh? That's physically impossible given real life. If you lose power half way through

new os,can anyone help me?

2001-02-05 Thread Lei Ding
Hi everybody, Now I am thinking writing a new Operating System(Open source software),which is more stable as linux,and easy to use as windows,and the most important one,is that No errors. if anyone is interesting,please write [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! Check out the Orange Ca

Network card

2001-02-05 Thread Annuit-Coeptis
Hy guys!: I was wondering if some one can help me with a problem with a Linksys 'EtherFast 10/100' network card, i have ben working on it the las two days with out any success. The box show a littel banner "Linux Test O.K." but when I try to make the drivers instalation, *'make'* gave me a lot o

Re: DHCP error - Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use

2001-02-05 Thread Chris Harvey
I wondered that.. > Is it possible that one of the addresses you've assigned for DHCP > assignment is in use on another box? > I did have the DHCP range as 10.1.1.10 - 10.1.1.100 and I had another machine on the Network using the 10.1.1.10 address.. so made the range 10.1.1.50 - 10.1.1.60 just k

Re: Lets get the mail footer changed

2001-02-05 Thread Ding Lei
Hi everybody, Now I am thinking writing a new Operating System(Open source software),which is more stable as linux,and easy to use as windows,and the most important one,is that No errors. if anyone is interesting,please write to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! waitin _

Re: DHCP error - Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Burger
Is it possible that one of the addresses you've assigned for DHCP assignment is in use on another box? On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Chris Harvey wrote: > I'm trying to set up DHCP on my Linux 6.2 system. I used the rpm from the > redhat site which appears to be ISC DHCP 2.0 > > I have two lan cards, one

DHCP error - Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use

2001-02-05 Thread Chris Harvey
I'm trying to set up DHCP on my Linux 6.2 system. I used the rpm from the redhat site which appears to be ISC DHCP 2.0 I have two lan cards, one for the outside on the regular static address given me by the ISP (eth0) and one on the internal side which I set to 10.1.1.1 (eth1) It doesn't seem to

PPP Problems?

2001-02-05 Thread Ben Hawkes
Hallo,   Upon installing RH 7.0, I went straight to rp3 and set up my PPP connection. It seemed to all go fine, and I booted up Red Hats PPP Dialer. The 'waiting to connect' dialog comes up briefly, but then, alas, nothing happens.   Is there something I've done wrong? Could my modem not b

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread lee johnson
> (I hope it > understands ASCII.) Try "cat /etc/lilo.conf > /dev/lp0". it does ascii just fine as i've had this printer working before no issuesgraphics/text done deal..:) well.I don't know what i may have done to my poor linuxbox :) but the command I issued above to direct lilo.conf t

RE: DNS named permissions

2001-02-05 Thread Guillermo Navarrete
Title: RE: DNS named permissions Assuming this is a fairly standard DNS install, check the permissions on the /var/named and/or /etc/named so that they are writable by owner (at least).  Guillermo -Original Message- From: David Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, Februa

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread Jack Bowling
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, lee johnson wrote: > > > > Does this happen when you try an print postscript output, text output, > > or both? (Printing from X is almost always postscript output.) It > > sounds like your print filter is failing. (Unless you are printing to a > > postscript printer...)

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, lee johnson wrote: > > hi mikkel and thanks for reply.. > > well gimp wize no clue..just nothing happens as i say. > > printtool wizei tried everything including postscript and > ascii..nadda on all counts > > epson stylus color 860..far as I know non-postsript? > > thanks:

RE: Rsync with Redhat 7.0

2001-02-05 Thread Thang Nguyen
Hi, I'm upraded my server to Redhat 7.0, and the inetd.conf mechanizm seem to change its filename and format and now it's /etc/xinetd.d/* and i want to setup my Rsync server like my 6.2 version such i put in the /etc/inetd.conf. how do i change to make my rsync server to work on redhat 7.0 p

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread lee johnson
> > Does this happen when you try an print postscript output, text output, > or both? (Printing from X is almost always postscript output.) It > sounds like your print filter is failing. (Unless you are printing to a > postscript printer...) Try the print tests from printtool, and see if > it

Re: up2date documentation?

2001-02-05 Thread Edward Dekkers
> # rpm -Uvh rpm-python-3.0.5-9.6x.i386.rpm python-xmlrpc-1.2.1-0.6. > x.i386.rpm rhn_register-1.0.2-0.6.x.noarch.rpm popt-1.5-9.6x.i386.rpm > python-1.5.2-27.6.x.i386.rpm up2date-2.1.7-0.6.x.i386.rpm > > I installed X on my server JUST to prevent a lot of this stuff. After I switched to GnoRPM

Re: Squid and non-permanent connections

2001-02-05 Thread Edward Dekkers
> http://my.webserver/cgi-bin/chill?ORGURL=http://www.nasa.gov > > Passing the ORGURL parameter allows the CGI script to generate the HTML > that will refresh to the original page every so many seconds. > > - Bob Glover Thanks for the reply Bob - I'll start playing when I have some time. Once I

Re: fisher install bombs on selecting video card

2001-02-05 Thread Ted Gervais
On Monday 05 February 2001 19:28, you wrote: > Bugzilla acknowledges this, but indicates no fix. I'm installing > the beta 7.1 and it dies every time I select the video card. > > Anyone? I just installed fisher today and at first I made a mistake and entered the wrong details for my video card.

Linux & Ultra ATA/66 HDD ports

2001-02-05 Thread red2cap
Hi everybody, I'm trying to install RedHat 7.0 in a PC which already have Win 2000 and Win 98. The problem is that all 4 IDE controllers are "bussy" with: 1st HDD + CD-ROM + CD-Writter + DVD. I still have a 2nd hard drive with about 3 Gb free for Linux connected to the Ultra ATA/66 port (the

Re: Date + somedays

2001-02-05 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 17:26:30 Kiran Kumar M wrote: >Thanks, for your mail.. I want to do it in perl. So I am looking for perl >command that will work. with any of CPAN Date Modules.. So use backticks or the system() function. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

growing an existing filesystem?

2001-02-05 Thread Michael Pelley
Folks, Can I grow an existing filesystem? I origionally had a 4 GB disk partitioned as: /home 2GB /usr1GB /var1GB This wasn't too bright, and I've moved /var over to another disk (no problem there, it was small!), but I need to extend the /usr partition to take

Evaluating SSH

2001-02-05 Thread Tanner, Robby
Hello all, I am looking for feedback on the various versions of SSH. Specifically, I would like a comparison of the commercial vs free version(s) wrt functionality, security, stability and ease of configuration/deployment. Regards, Rob ___ Re

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, lee johnson wrote: > > That will need to be recreated manually. A lot depends on your system, > > but try > > > > mkdir /var/spool/lpd > > chown rood:daemon /var/spool/lpd > > chmod 775 /var/spool/lpd > > i don't get any "errors" when trying to print so i doubt that is cau

Re: second IDE drive causes the "LI" boot hang

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Quick fix first - more added later: If you remove the second IDE drive, and make a boot floppy, you can put the second drive back in and boot from the floppy. (see mkbootdisk) On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Michael Jinks wrote: > Wonderful, this is all becoming clear now, thanks Mikkel. More > intersper

Re: print trouble

2001-02-05 Thread lee johnson
> That will need to be recreated manually. A lot depends on your system, > but try > > mkdir /var/spool/lpd > chown rood:daemon /var/spool/lpd > chmod 775 /var/spool/lpd i don't get any "errors" when trying to print so i doubt that is cause...just nothing gets printed BUT its consistent acros

Re: Lets get the mail footer changed

2001-02-05 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Peter Kiem wrote: > Maybe we should *ALL* email him directly and ask for the message footer at > the bottom to be changed to read something like: > > To unsubscribe from this list visit: > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > I am getting sick of all the "how to unsubscribe

fisher install bombs on selecting video card

2001-02-05 Thread Edward Schernau
Bugzilla acknowledges this, but indicates no fix. I'm installing the beta 7.1 and it dies every time I select the video card. Anyone? Ed ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: second IDE drive causes the "LI" boot hang

2001-02-05 Thread Michael Jinks
Wonderful, this is all becoming clear now, thanks Mikkel. More interspersed below. "Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote: > > Ok, this tells me a lot more about what is going on. Now, does the > system boot off the SCSI drive, or the IDE drive? The IDE drive. > difference on how to fix this problem.

re: modem problem

2001-02-05 Thread Larry Grover
On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:20:30 +0200, Masgras George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you sure it's not a WinModem? WinModems don't work with Linux. Period. > -Original Message- > From: Masgras George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 4:05 PM > To: lista > Subj

Re: E-Mail question

2001-02-05 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:08:10 Enrico Payne wrote: [snip] >Having said that, I too am a reasonable person, and understand that not all >attachments are dangerous. Hence I would only prevent file types that could >be launched by the browser, e-mail, or just by double clicking on it. >Chuck's solution

Re: second IDE drive causes the "LI" boot hang

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Michael Jinks wrote: > Thanks to everybody who has commented so far, very educational. Some > further info. > > > "Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote: > > > The only time LILO has problems when adding another drive is if you > > change the LBA mode, or if you have SCSI drives in the

Lets get the mail footer changed

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Kiem
Who's the manager for the mailing list? Maybe we should *ALL* email him directly and ask for the message footer at the bottom to be changed to read something like: To unsubscribe from this list visit: https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list I am getting sick of all the "how to

DNS named permissions

2001-02-05 Thread David Brett
I have finally got two DNS servers up and working. One being a slave of the first. Unfortunately the updates are not happening. The logs tend to indicate the problem is with permissions. The error message in the logs is: named-xfer[716]: can't make tmpfile (... Where do I have to make channge

Re: Kernel Won't Compile on RedHat 7.0

2001-02-05 Thread Samuel Flory
-Install kgcc. -alias gcc=kgcc "Wagner, Joseph" wrote: > > My kernel won't compile using the command: > > make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install > > I tried updating the packages. I have updated versions of: > > gcc > glibc > libstdc++ > modut

Re: Date + somedays

2001-02-05 Thread Kiran Kumar M
Thanks, for your mail.. I want to do it in perl. So I am looking for perl command that will work. with any of CPAN Date Modules.. Thanks, Kiran On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Dave Reed wrote: > > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 03:45:25 +0530 (IST) > > From: Kiran Kumar M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: Date + somedays [comments]

2001-02-05 Thread Statux
Perhaps you should be asking a Perl mailing list... > How can I get the Date + some days (for example 6th of Feb 2001 + 10 > should give 16th of Feb 2001...). How can I achieve this. I installed > Date::calc perl module... on Redhat.. ___ Redhat-list

Re: Date + somedays

2001-02-05 Thread Dave Reed
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 03:45:25 +0530 (IST) > From: Kiran Kumar M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > > How can I get the Date + some days (for example 6th of Feb 2001 + 10 > should give 16th of Feb 2001...). How can I achieve this. I installed > Date::calc perl module... on Redhat.. > > Thanks, > K

re: modem problem

2001-02-05 Thread Masgras George
Are you sure it's not a WinModem? WinModems don't work with Linux. Period. -Original Message- From: Masgras George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 4:05 PM To: lista Subject: Problems with modem... Hy...here's my problem...i have a 14400 internal modem on a p

Date + somedays

2001-02-05 Thread Kiran Kumar M
Hi, How can I get the Date + some days (for example 6th of Feb 2001 + 10 should give 16th of Feb 2001...). How can I achieve this. I installed Date::calc perl module... on Redhat.. Thanks, Kiran ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

RE: Problems with modem...

2001-02-05 Thread eric clover
not true. for more info see : http://www.linmodems.org & http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html eric - Original Message - Are you sure it's not a WinModem? WinModems don't work with Linux. Period. -Original Message- From: Masgras George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: Problems with modem...

2001-02-05 Thread Masgras George
  - Original Message - From: Wagner, Joseph To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:18 AM Subject: RE: Problems with modem... Are you sure it's not a WinModem?  WinModems don't work with Linux.  Period. -Original Message---

RE: Problems with modem...

2001-02-05 Thread Wagner, Joseph
Are you sure it's not a WinModem?  WinModems don't work with Linux.  Period. -Original Message-From: Masgras George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 4:05 PMTo: listaSubject: Problems with modem...  Hy...here's my problem...i have a 14400 intern

Re: Redhat 6.2 and windows 95...

2001-02-05 Thread Statux
> The problem you are running into is that the version of lilo that comes > with 6.2 uses the BIOS to load the kernel. > > One fix is to create a small (~16M) /boot partition at the start of the > disk. Then your / partition can be anyware on the disk. 16M is way too large for /boot. Even 5M is

Problems with modem...

2001-02-05 Thread Masgras George
 Hy...here's my problem...i have a 14400 internal modem on a pentium 166 system with RH 7.0 ...well...the strangest things happen here first: if I enter the KDE enviroment and try to connect to the net..it says that my modem isnt' responding second: if I run wvdial from bash first( t

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread Statux
Try following the link at the bottom of every email > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: RH 7.0 install problem

2001-02-05 Thread shoe
Normally I would agree and have even gone down that path in my troubleshooting. However, I installed and ran RH6.2 w/o an issue. Even following the 7.0 I did a fresh 6.2 install just to make sure and it worked fine. Reinstalled 7.0 and had problems again...it's really wierd.. the thing that I wou

Re: up2date documentation?

2001-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
"The answer to the documentation issue on up2date, assuming he's running a system with up2date on it (like a 7.0) is "man up2date"" (Mike Burger in this thread) Yeppers, Mike: you're right: I also have "man up2date" now after doing this here (the formatting of the following is perhaps not quite c

Kernel Won't Compile on RedHat 7.0

2001-02-05 Thread Wagner, Joseph
My kernel won't compile using the command: make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install I tried updating the packages. I have updated versions of: gcc glibc libstdc++ modutils That didn't help. I also tried updating the Makefile as directed by the Re

Re: devfs in kernel 2.4.1

2001-02-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 07:38:40PM -0700, Frank Jacobberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Anyone tried to use the devfs in RH7 with | kernel 2.4.1 (CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) Not with RH7. But with 2.4.0, yes. Haven't got around to using devfsd yet (I'm inclined to adopt a Klingon accent and say "devfsd is

Re: second IDE drive causes the "LI" boot hang

2001-02-05 Thread Michael Jinks
Thanks to everybody who has commented so far, very educational. Some further info. "Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote: > The only time LILO has problems when adding another drive is if you > change the LBA mode, or if you have SCSI drives in the system. Adding > an IDE drive to a system that boots o

Re: X3.3.6 to X4.0.2

2001-02-05 Thread Adam Sleight
It's usually a month to a month and a half after they release a beta. They released fisher about a week ago so figure it out. BTW. I'm tried progeny (beta 2) with XFree 4.02 and RH fisher 4.02 and it doesn't seem to like my Matrox G400 32MB. I've tried 24-bit, 16-bit 1024x768. I thought maybe

Re: Which nic's

2001-02-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:49:09PM -0600, A Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Monday 05 February 2001 12:13, Jerry Human opined: | > I'm getting ready to network all my boxes and was checking out | > Pricewatch for nic's. Most of them are not listed in the compatible | > hardware list until yo

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:11:23AM -0600, Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >V>>This link https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list | >V>>is at the bottom of every message on this list. | > | >at the bottom of the page it says: | > | >"To change your subscription (set options like

Spammers

2001-02-05 Thread Szemerédy Gábor
SOLVED! Thanks for your help! m4 was the solution! Gabor begin:vcard n:Szemerédy;Gábor x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.srce.net org:Zavod za informatiku i AOP;HW-SW version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Szemerédy Gábor adr;quoted-printable:;;Adolfa Singera 12=0D=0A;Subotica;;24o

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread Vidiot
Ashley M. Kirchner responded: [... explanation deleted ...] Thank you, that was the explanation I was looking for. MB -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bart: Hey, why is it destroying other toys? Lisa: They must have programmed it to eliminate the competition. Bart: You mean like Micr

Re: Funny

2001-02-05 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Steven, > http://bbspot.com/News/2000/6/php_suspend.html Have a coke and a smile ;-). Bye, Leonard. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: second IDE drive causes the "LI" boot hang

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Warren Melnick wrote: > If the other drive was hanging the IDE bus then lilo would never have gotten > far enough to give the "LI" part of the prompt. More likely the geometry of > this new drive is causing lilo to have a heart attack. Therefore > eliminating lilo should eli

RE: RH 7.0 install problem

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, shoe wrote: > Okay the saga continues... > > If I power off the machine and leave it for a while it MAY start up however > it gives a segmentation fault for just about every service it starts. Most > of the time though it will not start. It is giving the segmentation fault > e

Re: This is real hell

2001-02-05 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Vidiot wrote: > My point still stands, one doesn't need to use a password to make > subscribing/unsubscribing secure. Password isn't *necessarily* needed for un/subscribing, you're correct. However, in the case of RedHat, as well as many other companies and individuals running the GNU Mailma

RE: donations for eaarthquake

2001-02-05 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Ashok Kanodia wrote: > I think this is an issue to be posted in every mailing list not only > redhat-list and every one should contribute in the relief fund for the > earthquake victims. > I do not agree. It does not fit the topics that the list was created for. The earthqu

Re: second IDE drive causes the "LI" boot hang

2001-02-05 Thread Vidiot
> >If the other drive was hanging the IDE bus then lilo would never have gotten >far enough to give the "LI" part of the prompt. More likely the geometry of >this new drive is causing lilo to have a heart attack. Therefore >eliminating lilo should eliminate the problem. lilo absolutely does car

  1   2   3   >