Sorry if this isn't the right place to ask, but I couldn't figure out
anywhere else.
I enjoy keeping my system running the latest Rawhide release. I don't
mind if things are sometimes broken -- it's fun to see what people are
developing. But I'm wondering if there'
I'm not sure if this is the correct forum to ask about Rawhide RPMs.
Please be kind and let me know if it isn't.
I'm wondering what has changed recently wrt/ locales & glibc-2.3.1-51.
In particular how do I make man happy again?
I was using glibc-2.3.1-5 before I recently up
Troels Arvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Sometimes, when I download packages from Rawhide, a GPG signature is
> missing from the packages. I use a mirror site.
>
> Should I be alarmed, or is it normal that some rawhide packages are not
> signed?
It's normal. Stuff in rawhide
Hello,
Sometimes, when I download packages from Rawhide, a GPG signature is
missing from the packages. I use a mirror site.
Should I be alarmed, or is it normal that some rawhide packages are not
signed?
--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
Howdy,
Anybody else get authentication failure on
Rawhide compiled postgresql-7.3.1-4 (applied
to 7.3-6 too) when trying access a db locally?
Doesn't really matter what user you try, but
let's make sure we should be allowed ...
# service postgresql status
postmaster (pid 24011 24009
Is this the official place to discuss rawhide, or is there somewhere
other than this hidden around? The redhat.com doesnt list a
rawhide-list...
ttfn,
A
--
Alexander Hoogerhuis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE | +47 908 21 485
Quite recently RawHide contained gnutls RPMs; now there are none. Can
anyone tell me why?
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Server Solutions Grouphttp://www.e-smith.com/
Mitel Networks Corporationhttp://www.mitel.com/
Phone: +1 (613) 592
Florian, Eric,
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > ... but sure you knew all that and if this was not
> > your point it would be more helpful if you would
> > come out and explain in little more detail what's
> > going on and what you are after, please.
>
> The BuildRequires are _al
> ... but sure you knew all that and if this was not
> your point it would be more helpful if you would
> come out and explain in little more detail what's
> going on and what you are after, please.
The BuildRequires are _all_ being looked at, "ifarch" or other tries
to limit them to special case
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Erik Troan wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Riku Meskanen wrote:
>
> > Ok, how about?
> >
> > %ifarch i386
> > BuildRequires: dietlibc
> > %endif
>
> There is only one source RPM for all platforms -- this won't do what
> you want.
>
Eric, however amazing it may appear I knew alre
Are you in Redhat planing on including XFS support in rawhide kernel, since all
other distributions support this file system now?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:56:59AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> I wish to use one of my systems with all the latest Rawhide packages for
> testing and bug fixing purposes. Is there an automated way of upgrading to
> the latest available Rawhide packages?
I'd suggest mirroring th
Hello,
I wish to use one of my systems with all the latest Rawhide packages for
testing and bug fixing purposes. Is there an automated way of upgrading to
the latest available Rawhide packages?
Thanks,
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Riku Meskanen wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Anybody out there get the same with std man command from rawhide?
>
> Or is it just me with 7.2 and upgraded man version from rawhide?
>
> [mesrik@tacit tmp]$ man --
> Segmentation fault
...
> Bugzilla or not?
Howdy,
Anybody out there get the same with std man command from rawhide?
Or is it just me with 7.2 and upgraded man version from rawhide?
[mesrik@tacit tmp]$ man --
Segmentation fault
[mesrik@tacit tmp]$ ltrace man -- 2>&1 | tail -10
strcmp("MANDEFOPTIONS", "DECOMP
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am trying to build an smp kernel rpm from src rpm provided at rawhide.
> For some reason I get plenty of errors and build fails. UP/BOOT kernels
> build fine from the same src rpm.
>
> Am I doing something wrong, or there is a problem?
Hi Leonid,
Hello All,
I am trying to build an smp kernel rpm from src rpm provided at rawhide.
For some reason I get plenty of errors and build fails. UP/BOOT kernels
build fine from the same src rpm.
Am I doing something wrong, or there is a problem?
TIA.
--
Best regards,
Leonid Mamtchenkov, RHCE
On 2002-03-02, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
:I'm wondering where you (RedHat developers) get the source tarball
:for this package, because there's no URL in the specfile.
I seem to remember that Bernhard Rosenkraenzer of Red Hat is also a
member of the wu-ftpd team. If you don't find the source t
On Sunday, 03 March 2002, Kevin Ford wrote:
> Dmoinik;
>
> Here is the URL for wu-ftpd
>
> ftp://ftp.wu-ftpd.org/pub/wu-ftpd/wu-ftpd-2.6.2.tar.gz
I know this one. That's not what's in the current RawHide RPM.
> URL in spec file should be:
>
> ftp://
Behalf Of Dominik
Mierzejewski
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wu-ftpd package in RawHide
Hello, list.
I'm wondering where you (RedHat developers) get the source tarball
for this package, because there's no URL in the specfile.
Also I noticed that t
Hello, list.
I'm wondering where you (RedHat developers) get the source tarball
for this package, because there's no URL in the specfile.
Also I noticed that the tarball in wu-ftpd-2.6.2-3.src.rpm contains
two .src.rpms in wu-ftpd/src directory! Hence its size.
I made a patch to correct many compi
> hi,
> it seems almost impossible to catch a snap of rawhide when it is consistent.
> a very stupid but useful check would be useful for those who put these files
> to the mirror site, just run the following two lines on stock rh 7.2 (this
> means all rpm instqalled from rh 7
e last few weeks, there is not any snapshot where
> > this script run because of some dependenies.
>
> That's not a bug in rawhide, it's a bug in your script. If e.g.
> kernel-2.4.17-0.19 requires modutils >= 2.4.10 (it does) and you don't
> have it, the first co
because of some dependenies.
That's not a bug in rawhide, it's a bug in your script. If e.g.
kernel-2.4.17-0.19 requires modutils >= 2.4.10 (it does) and you don't
have it, the first command will fail...
You may find this preferrable:
rpm -Fvh kernel*i6* glibc*i6* `ls *.rpm |
hi,
it seems almost impossible to catch a snap of rawhide when it is consistent.
a very stupid but useful check would be useful for those who put these files
to the mirror site, just run the following two lines on stock rh 7.2 (this
means all rpm instqalled from rh 7.2 except those which are
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 05:53:13AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> > I think the JRE is free to distribute, and that's what I see.
>
> Only if Java used in the product you're shipping the JRE with. I
That's easily managed;-)
Couldn't it be deployed as the Java runtime element for Moz,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 05:53:13AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> I think the JRE is free to distribute, and that's what I see.
Only if Java used in the product you're shipping the JRE with. I
believe that there are still non-competitive clauses in the contract
that restrict you from redist
* Hetz Ben Hamo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Red Hat shipped 10 CDs with the Red Hat Linux 7.2 Professional Edition.
> > Five of these were open source software, and the rest were mixed open
> > source and commercial software.
> >
> > So what you requested is already there :)
>
> Heh,
>
> I th
> > Red Hat shipped 10 CDs with the Red Hat Linux 7.2 Professional Edition.
> > Five of these were open source software, and the rest were mixed open
> > source and commercial software.
> >
> > So what you requested is already there :)
>
> Heh,
>
> I think RH should start distribute a DVD-ROM wi
> Hetz Ben Hamo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > It's a mistake that they're there. Will be corrected shortly.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > Why won't redhat release to the public an additional ISO with free programs
>
> > that are not GPL'd? (free as "free beer")
>
> They may be free to *use*, but th
> Red Hat shipped 10 CDs with the Red Hat Linux 7.2 Professional Edition.
> Five of these were open source software, and the rest were mixed open
> source and commercial software.
>
> So what you requested is already there :)
Heh,
I think RH should start distribute a DVD-ROM with all that stuff.
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 16:15, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Why won't redhat release to the public an additional ISO with free programs
> that are not GPL'd? (free as "free beer")
>
> After all - it's just an added value IMHO.
Red Hat shipped 10 CDs with the Red Hat Linux 7.2 Professional Edition.
Fiv
Hetz Ben Hamo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > It's a mistake that they're there. Will be corrected shortly.
>
> Why?
>
> Why won't redhat release to the public an additional ISO with free programs
> that are not GPL'd? (free as "free beer")
They may be free to *use*, but they may not be free to
On Friday 22 February 2002 23:07, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Christopher McCrory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Commercial licence? Is this in rawhide by mistake, or is the licence a
> > mistake?
>
> It's a mistake that they're there. Will be corrected shortly.
Wh
Christopher McCrory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Commercial licence? Is this in rawhide by mistake, or is the licence a
> mistake?
It's a mistake that they're there. Will be corrected shortly.
Bill
___
Redhat-devel-list mai
Hello...
I see java rpms in rawhide. IIHO, this is cool. But I also see:
rpm -qpli IBMJava2-JRE-1.3-1.0.src.rpm
Name: IBMJava2-JRE Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.3 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
Release : 1.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> When Rawhide was announced this was the designated list. One thing
> that
> bothers me about this list now is there are so many other lists
> (kickstart, tpm, anacaconda for example) that there are hardly enough
> development issues to sustain
--- Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the same time, it's extremely easy for me to lose
> an email about
> something in the pile of emails I get every day.
Bugzilla is much better for documenting issues because
every step of the process is put into writing and then
filed into the DB.
--- John Ellson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, it surprises me that some rpm
> dependency errors seem
> to not get fixed quickly. Would you like us to
> report them?
I think they would rather have us fix them than report
them.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
__
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
> When Rawhide was announced this was the designated list. One thing that
> bothers me about this list now is there are so many other lists
> (kickstart, tpm, anacaconda for example) that there are hardly enough
> development issue
> hi,
> first of all IMHO it's a good think that rawhide is updated regualry (almost
> every day), on the other hand it'd be useful to be always consistent.
> it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide. yes I know I can
> put bugreport into bug
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Levente Farkas wrote:
> > THere is one. And not only that, you sent that mailing list requesting
> > its existance. From
> > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README:
> >
> > http://developer.redhat.com will host a web sit
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 11:05, Levente Farkas wrote:
> I vote agaist bugzilla in this case. I put bugreports about rh distro
> into bugzilla, but rawhide is changing so rapidly, that I (and I assume
> many other people) would not like to use bugzilla. there are dozens of
> dependency bu
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Bugzilla.
>
> I vote agaist bugzilla in this case. I put bugreports about rh distro
> into bugzilla, but rawhide is changing so rapidly, that I (and I assume
> many other people) would not like to use bugzilla. there are doz
ing list requesting
> > its existance. From
> > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README:
> >
> > http://developer.redhat.com will host a web site devoted to Raw Hide,
> > and
> > the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list will be the centerpiece of
> > discu
Jag wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide
>
> THere is one. And not only that, you sent that mailing list requesting
> its existance. From
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Levente Farkas wrote:
> it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide
THere is one. And not only that, you sent that mailing list requesting
its existance. From
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README:
http://developer.redhat.com will ho
John Ellson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> >hi,
> >first of all IMHO it's a good think that rawhide is updated regualry (almost
> >every day), on the other hand it'd be useful to be always consistent.
> >it'd be useful
Levente Farkas wrote:
>hi,
>first of all IMHO it's a good think that rawhide is updated regualry (almost
>every day), on the other hand it'd be useful to be always consistent.
>it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide. yes I know I can
>put bugreport
Hi -
I was just wondering if Red Hat was planning on including RPMs necessary
for digital video authoring in Rawhide anytime soon... these are
packages like libraw1394, libavc1394, dvgrab, avifile, mjpegtools...
I got my 7.2 system up and running with all this stuff, but I found that
none of
Levente Farkas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> there are more problems with postfix in rawhide with the rpm scripts.
> first of all if the postfix user already exists than the install or
> upgrade failed. than if I delete the postfix user for /etc/passwd:
Please report all these pr
hi,
there are more problems with postfix in rawhide with the rpm scripts.
first of all if the postfix user already exists than the install or
upgrade failed. than if I delete the postfix user for /etc/passwd:
# rpm -Uvh postfix-1.1.2-3.i386.rpm
Preparing
ur message. So I thought that perhaps I
> was taking the wrong approach and that there was some way to cleanly
> install all of Rawhide at once. Your message suggests that I'll be
> better off just trying to install the packages I want, fighting
> through the dependency issues by d
So I thought that perhaps I
> was taking the wrong approach and that there was some way to cleanly
> install all of Rawhide at once. Your message suggests that I'll be
> better off just trying to install the packages I want, fighting
> through the dependency issues by do
wrong
approach and that there was some way to cleanly install all of Rawhide at
once. Your message suggests that I'll be better off just trying to install
the packages I want, fighting through the dependency issues by downloading
and/or rebuilding extra packages as necessary - so I'll d
Adam Dingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I discovered Red Hat's Rawhide FTP directory
> (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/) not long ago, and I've
> successfully grabbed a few packages from it and installed them on top of my
> Red Hat 7.2 installation.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rawhide: where's the comps file?
I sent a message to this list yesterday asking how I can install an entire
rawhide distribution on my machine. I haven't received any responses, so
I've been investigating myself and I've made pretty good progress
--- Adam Dingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I discovered Red Hat's Rawhide FTP directory
> (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/) not
> long ago, and I've
> successfully grabbed a few packages from it and
> installed them on top of my
> Red Hat
I sent a message to this list yesterday asking how I can install an entire
rawhide distribution on my machine. I haven't received any responses, so
I've been investigating myself and I've made pretty good progress. It seems
that the anaconda-runtime package has some scripts wh
I discovered Red Hat's Rawhide FTP directory
(ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/) not long ago, and I've
successfully grabbed a few packages from it and installed them on top of my
Red Hat 7.2 installation. OK, so now I've decided I'm ready to head further
out on
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 11:45, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> You mean IBM JFS?
>
> I wish there was some sort of convert tool between ext2 to other fs (like
> reiser,JFS, XFS etc) - I have 300GB stuff on my hard drives here, so copying
> it to other drive is a huge problems for me.
Try http://tzukanov.
est rawhide kernel work great with with my JFS boot partion.
> Are you in RedHat going to include XFS also in RedHat linux tree ?I hope
> so.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Redhat latest rawhide kernel work great with with my JFS boot partion.
Are you in RedHat going to include XFS also in RedHat linux tree ?I hope
so.
Where could I find out more information about the latest/current rawhide
kernel?
Specifically I am curious about :
1) performance testing results
2) cerebrus results
3) what patches are applied against it
4) is anyone using it for non-testing purposes and if so what type of
workload?
Doug
[please CC me, am off-list]
Does the 2.4.16 RPM on rawhide have the "hidden" LVS patch to handle the
ARP problem in LVS-DR clusters? If not, might there be some commentary
regarding the reasons for its exclusion?
http://www.linux-vs.org/~julian/hidden.txt
http://www.linuxvirtual
--- Michael Tokarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is about C++ only. C language programs ARE
> compatible. Note that
> in e.g. 7.x, there is libstdc++-compat libraries, I
> expect to find the
> same on 8.x, so your C++ programs compiled on 7.x
> will run just fine on
> 8.x -- like 6.x vs 7
--- Jean Francois Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Alex Kanavin wrote:
> Reiserutils was in 7.2 and I think in 7.1. 7.2
> kernel has reiserfs
> support and I think 7.1was compiled with ReiserFS
> support too. So you
> can create and mount ReiserFS partitions if you
> want.
I have us
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Actually, Redhat like to stay very silent during development of their next
> version.
> > By the way, it's a pity that the only way to know where Red Hat's going is
> > to browse through heaps of rawhide rpms an
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
> Actually, Redhat like to stay very silent during development of their next
> version.
>
> For example - did you know that GCC 3.1 CVS is the new default compiler in
> Redhat rawhide? (8.0), so I wouldn't recommend people grab RPMS from rawhide
>
Alex Kanavin wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
>>Moving from ext2 to anything else besides ext3 is a PITA, and redhat has the
>>tradition not to support anything rather ext2/ext3...
>>
>
>Well, I think I saw reiserfs utils in the latest rawh
Actually, Redhat like to stay very silent during development of their next
version.
For example - did you know that GCC 3.1 CVS is the new default compiler in
Redhat rawhide? (8.0), so I wouldn't recommend people grab RPMS from rawhide
since (I assume) they're compiled with the new
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Moving from ext2 to anything else besides ext3 is a PITA, and redhat has the
> tradition not to support anything rather ext2/ext3...
Well, I think I saw reiserfs utils in the latest rawhide, so support for
reiserfs probably will be incuded i
ext2/ext3...
On Friday 21 December 2001 20:37 pm, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
> Are redhat going to include other journal files systems in its rawhide
> kernel, like SGI's XFS or IBM's JFS? Redhat's kernel tend to be better t
Are redhat going to include other journal files systems in its rawhide kernel, like
SGI's XFS
or IBM's JFS? Redhat's kernel tend to be better than a vanila kernel.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lis
Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this the appropriate list where rawhide developers
> mediate
Yes.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat
Is this the appropriate list where rawhide developers
mediate, and if not, where would that be? If one were
developing something in hopes to get it into the RH
distro, where would they be asking questions and
talking to other developers if the/this rawhide list
isn't the proper place
¡i ¦b [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Mastwijk) ªº¤j§@¤¤´£¨ì: ¡j
: Hello.
: Anyone know of any public rsync mirrors that carry the up-to-date rawhide
: tree?
: John
: ___
: Redhat-devel-list mailing list
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
Hello.
Anyone know of any public rsync mirrors that carry the up-to-date rawhide
tree?
John
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Hi,
Why so slow the rawhide.redhat.com via ftp?
The maximum speed all time about 3kB/s. So for example the tetex source
-~60MB- come down all the day, if it come.
And why update the timestamp, without any version, or file size changing?
For this, I download about 500MB for nothing.
Thanks for t
Scott Sharkey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> So, where are the Glide3 packages, and while I'm at it I notice
> that the compat-egcs stuff is also missing. Is rawhide not intended
> to be a complete set of files?
Glide3 is integrated into the new XFree86 p
Hi All,
I was wanting to try the 2.4.2 kernels on one of my test boxes. So,
I d/l'ed everything and started plugging away on upgrades. Somehow,
X 4.0.2 got dragged in (no problem - I wanna test that too). BUT,
X says it needs Glide3 RPMS, which are nowhere on rawhide. I found
some on co
Jonathan Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to try out rawhide on a Gateway Solo 9100 (I have it set up to
> boot up to 3 different Linux OS but I use mostly RH 7.0) but any way I
> slice it the installer dies before install begins. I'm hoping someone
> has got th
Hi all,
I want to try out rawhide on a Gateway Solo 9100 (I have it set up to
boot up to 3 different Linux OS but I use mostly RH 7.0) but any way I
slice it the installer dies before install begins. I'm hoping someone
has got this to work and can just tell me the secret, but if not I ca
...on USB configuration. Has anybody else had this problem?
--
Chuck Mead, Owner, MoonGroup.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Note: all html email sent to me is deleted unread)
GnuPG Public Key Available: http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing
Christopher McCrory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I know that RedHat Sparc is officially unsupported. But, why are there
> no install support files for sparc in the rawhide tree? oversight?
> broken compiles? WIll using the install programs from 6.2 work with a
> lit
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > Environment: gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2.1-2, binutils-2.10.1.0.2-2, freetype-1.3.1-7
And rawhide's freetype-2.0.1-4 will not build.
Using rawhide gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2-12, and kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12
(I'm have trouble
Hello...
I know that RedHat Sparc is officially unsupported. But, why are there
no install support files for sparc in the rawhide tree? oversight?
broken compiles? WIll using the install programs from 6.2 work with a
little tweaking?
Will RH7.1 sparc ship?
In the
Svante Signell wrote:
>
> Environment: gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2.1-2, binutils-2.10.1.0.2-2, freetype-1.3.1-7
>
> freetype-*2.0.1-40 not yet installed. Does this library supply include
> files at /usr/include/freetype2 resolving the problem below? If so,
> perhaps XFree86 should depend on that lib
Environment: gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2.1-2, binutils-2.10.1.0.2-2, freetype-1.3.1-7
freetype-*2.0.1-40 not yet installed. Does this library supply include
files at /usr/include/freetype2 resolving the problem below? If so,
perhaps XFree86 should depend on that library too, in addition to
Glide3-de
BS"D
Hi,
could not compile any modules for 2.4.0-x kernels from rawhide.
After 'make menukonfig' compiled with 'make dep clean bzImage' ... and
everything went through successfully. But when it comes to compile any
modules 'make modules' the compilations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Does it even matter?
probably not. Rawhide isn't guaranteed to install, and sometimes the guarantee
is that it won't.
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftps
On 17 Jan 2001, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BR" == Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BR> kernel-utils is obsolete, use the new ksymoops package.
>
> I'm curious: is there some way to cope with packages changing names or
> splitting other than doing it by hand? Obviou
On 17 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
> > > which RPMs must go into disc1 and which should go into disc2?
> >
> > It only matters for how often it will ask you to swap CDs. Other than
> > that, which RPM goes where isn't particularly relevant.
>
> Thanks. Your answer, however, begs a followu
>
> Thanks. Your answer, however, begs a followup question: "What
> allotment should I choose to minimize swapping CDs?"
>
i suggest you to see what RPMS are in disc2 of 7.0 and do a similiar iso
image.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
> From: Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Anand Palaniswamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
>
> > which RPMs must go into disc1 and which should go into disc2?
>
> It only matters for how often it will ask you to swap CDs. Other than
> that, which RPM goes where isn't particularly relevant.
Anand Palaniswamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I want to burn 2 CD's with rawhide rpms. I found
>
> ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/i386/README
>
> but this document (because its intent is to explain CD->filesystem and
> not vice versa) doesn't answ
I want to burn 2 CD's with rawhide rpms. I found
ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/i386/README
but this document (because its intent is to explain CD->filesystem and
not vice versa) doesn't answer one question I have -- which RPMs must
go into disc1 and which should
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:41:01PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> And so is konqueror - 7.1 will have at least 4 usable open source browsers
> (Mozilla, konqueror, lynx, links).
No w3m?
--
Rodger Donaldson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Windows is the answer, but only if the questio
> From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 19:41:01 +0100 (CET)
>
> On 8 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> And so is konqueror - 7.1 will have at least 4 usable open source browsers
> (Mozilla, konqueror, lynx, links).
Which of these currently have RPMs and
On 8 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> Few comments about the latest rawhide release (2001-01-03).
>
> - printtool is now gone. You should make printool a symlink to
> lprngtool.
Is this an ncurses based tool or yet another USELESS GUI thing?
--
..Tom
1 - 100 of 347 matches
Mail list logo
