[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The right attitude is NOT just remove linuxconf and use Emacs :-) on
> the config
Did I say I use Emacs? I "rpm -e'd" that too;-)
You use emacs if you like. I prefer vim.
btw I don't recommend webmin either. I can't; never used it.
The right attitude is for each
John Summerfield a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Interesting ... and what you suggest for a company like the one that I
> > work
>
> If you like it, use it.
>
> Some of us don't and don't.
>
If Linuxconf is unadequate then the right attitude is either to suggest
another
tool like webmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Interesting ... and what you suggest for a company like the one that I
> work
If you like it, use it.
Some of us don't and don't.
To each his own choice.
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, comb
Check the changelog for V1.23 at the linuxconf
page, http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/
It appears someone has written a LPRng module for linuxconf
and several other new modules. It was released Dec 5, while
the version in RHL 7.0 is 1.19r2 from July 25, and patched by
RedHat last on Aug 23 (
On Saturday 09 December 2000 06:32, Tom Diehl wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:55:32PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> > > I know that this has been mentioned here before, but can I *beg* that
> > > redhat developers seriously and urgently consider eithe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > is "rpm -e linuxconf" here.
>
> You too?
Me too :)
- Panu -
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:55:32PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> > I know that this has been mentioned here before, but can I *beg* that
> > redhat developers seriously and urgently consider either modifying
> > printtool to allow it to work with a text/cu
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > is "rpm -e linuxconf" here.
>
> You too?
like everybody, who rather edit an ascii file in /etc that destroy all
readable config files...
-- Leventehttp://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
"The only thing worse th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Huh? Get real! :) One of the *classy* things about linux is that
> it runs *really* well on low-end "old" legacy hardware. There is a
> HUGE demand for cheap (second-hand) hardware (eg, in 3rd world
> countries) BECAUSE linux is cheap, available, and it works on tha
On Wed Dec 06 2000 at 19:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > There should be NO pre-requisite that a box have a working X server
> > > just to be able to configure its printers. Or anything else.
(which I originally wrote)
> Fo my part I really beg RedHat developpers to remove any kind of tex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Fo my part I really beg RedHat developpers to remove any kind of text
> based config tool. In our days where a low end hard disk is 10 G, 100
>
Nothing forces you to install them, or having installed them, to use them.
Nobody's saying take awau the GUI tools; they w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> is "rpm -e linuxconf" here.
You too?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:55:32PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> > I know that this has been mentioned here before, but can I *beg* that
> > redhat developers seriously and urgently consider either modifying
> > printtool to allow it to work with a text/curses interface on a
> > console or with
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> > > There should be NO pre-requisite that a box have a working X server
> > > just to be able to configure its printers. Or anything else.
>
> I certainly concur.
>
> ... netcfg and netconf are also a similar pa
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > There should be NO pre-requisite that a box have a working X server
> > just to be able to configure its printers. Or anything else.
I certainly concur.
... netcfg and netconf are also a similar pair of offenders. I just
give up and install a very
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:55:32PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> I know that this has been mentioned here before, but can I *beg* that
> redhat developers seriously and urgently consider either modifying
> printtool to allow it to work with a text/curses interface on a
> console or within an X term,
16 matches
Mail list logo
