On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Chris Abbey wrote:
>(note 1: "spam", not "SPAM" or "Spam", the latter are trademarks of
>Hormel Foods, and they get a little snippy with people degrading their
>trademark. But they consent to allow us "spam" in place of the gross
>"uce" acronym.)
No offense... but gimme a br
ok guys, enough already. If you want to fight spam (1) then come
on over to spamcop.net and join us in fighting it the right way.
I've already lart'd the abuse staff at Anglia Polytechnic University
and explicitly drew their attention to how ill-chosen his target
was - I'm sure they'll teach him a
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>I've only done it once, and that was because I was on his list 5 times so I
>kept getting 5 copies of his spam, and the fact that despite my efforts he
>wouldn't take me off. He'd use different mail accounts as they were shut
>down, but still keep the same
Of course, spam is evil. But don't be a vigilante! Because of the
totally unauthenticated nature of e-mail, it is usually impossible to
be certain of the perpetrator. Received: lines can be faked just like
nearly every other byte in an e-mail message. I was much more the
victim of spam than an
While I've taken an aggressive approach to SPAM in the past as
well (mailbombs), I've never went as far as you claim to have
done, but I do know one thing... It was a waste of MY time to do
so. Many people said just delete them and ignore, but it is JUST
SO DAMNED HARD to do that when someone is
On 13 Jul 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>Date: 13 Jul 2000 13:07:56 -0400
>From: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ADV: High Search Engine Placement
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernhard Rosenkraenzer ) writes:
>
>>
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>I think that prosecuting spammers is far too polite. I had a spammer target
>my hotmail account, filling it up with up to 5 of the same e-mail because my
>address was in it 5 times. I tried reasoning with them, and they'd say
>they'd take me of their list
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Greg Wright wrote:
>>> How is it that this is possible?
>>> Certainly if this were to be exploited by many more companies such as
>this it would diminish the value of this group.
>>
>>Currently, anyone may post to the list so even people who aren't
>>subscribed can get answer
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 13/07/00 at 13:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernhard Rosenkraenzer ) writes:
>
>>Currently, anyone may post to the list so even people who aren't
>>subscribed can get answers to their questions.
>
>AFAIK that's bogus - you have to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernhard Rosenkraenzer ) writes:
> Currently, anyone may post to the list so even people who aren't
> subscribed can get answers to their questions.
AFAIK that's bogus - you have to be subscribed to at least one list to
be able to post.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
n can stop a spammer, but trashing
their equipment and making their lives hell is more fun - and less
expensive.
This email has been scanned for viruses using Trend Interscan Virus Wall
Title: RE: ADV: High Search Engine Placement
I think i'll have to agree with Steven, there are so m
equipment and making their lives hell is more fun - and less
expensive.
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 July 2000 14:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ADV: High Search Engine Placement
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Michael Waite wrote:
&
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 13/07/00 at 15:03 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Michael Waite wrote:
>
>> How is it that this is possible?
>> Certainly if this were to be exploited by many more companies such as
this it would diminish the value of this group.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Michael Waite wrote:
>Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:46:20 -0400
>From: Michael Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ADV: High Search Engine Placement
>
>How is it that this is possible? Certainly if this were to be
>exploited
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Michael Waite wrote:
> How is it that this is possible?
> Certainly if this were to be exploited by many more companies such as this it would
>diminish the value of this group.
Currently, anyone may post to the list so even people who aren't
subscribed can get answers to th
How is it that this is possible?
Certainly if this were to be exploited by many more companies such as this it would
diminish the value of this group.
-Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Removal instructions below
>
> I saw your listing on the internet.
>
> I work for a company that specializ
16 matches
Mail list logo