On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Chris Abbey wrote:

>(note 1: "spam", not "SPAM" or "Spam", the latter are trademarks of
>Hormel Foods, and they get a little snippy with people degrading their
>trademark. But they consent to allow us "spam" in place of the gross
>"uce" acronym.)

No offense... but gimme a break..  SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM and SPAM.

HORMEL FOODS _THIS_.  SPAM SPAM SPAM.

Freedom of speech.  SPAM is a word.  I will use whatever words I
want in my daily life.  Nobody can copyright a word, and prevent
the human race from uttering it.  SPAM.

I *DARE* them to persue me legally for using the word SPAM in
this email.  If they were to.. they'd get slashdotted VERY
quickly, and likely a team of lawyers right up their *ss.

SPAM sucks, and it has been called such for quite some
time.  Regardless of anyone's personal legal ideas... I will
continue to exercise my right to freedom of speech and choice of
words as a human being.

Try doing a search online on the word SPAM, and see how a lawsuit
would hold up in court.  They'd have to sue about 20 million
people.

End of story.



-- 
Mike A. Harris                                     Linux advocate     
Computer Consultant                                  GNU advocate  
Capslock Consulting                          Open Source advocate

... Our continuing mission: To seek out knowledge of C, to explore
strange UNIX commands, and to boldly code where no one has man page 4.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Reply via email to