Re: regd kernel compilation

2001-11-05 Thread Martin Mačok
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:26:38PM -0500, Step 1 B wrote: > Cant this be done during compilation(ie., kernel building) itself so > that I get a smaller kernel and a smaller set of modules on my disk > ? Or is just that the current kernel compilation framework does not > support this ? Kernel run

regd kernel compilation

2001-11-05 Thread Step 1 B
Hi During the processing of compiling the kernel and getting it running, I observed that my kernel not only contains software for my current hardware configuration, but also for other hardware as well.(both in the kernel and as modules). and during bootup, the kernel identifies the hardware and e

Re: Starting X-apps from daemons

2001-11-05 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hello, > > May be this is not an appropriate list to ask this question. > So, apologies for that in advance! > > Does anyone know if it is possible to launch X-applications > (such as Netscape) from within a daemon (on a server running Linux)? Yes, if it has permi

Starting X-apps from daemons

2001-11-05 Thread Tushar_Oza
Hello, May be this is not an appropriate list to ask this question. So, apologies for that in advance! Does anyone know if it is possible to launch X-applications (such as Netscape) from within a daemon (on a server running Linux)? If it is possible, then please tell me how to do it. If not, p

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5) req'd by bind-rc8.1

2001-11-05 Thread Svante Signell
Hello, After building the latest bind (9.2.0-0.rc8.1) from source it did not install: rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686/bind-*9.2.0-0.rc8.1.i686.rpm error: failed dependencies: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5) is needed by bind-9.2.0-0.rc8.1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5) is needed by bind-

Re: postfix for 7.2

2001-11-05 Thread Dominik Mierzejewski
On Monday, 05 November 2001, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Monday 05 Nov 2001 10:18 am, bero wrote: > [michel@aurora michel]$ rpm -q postfix > postfix-20011008-1pcreSASL > This version is missing all the documentations. > > Thanks for maintaining Postfix - and all those daily builds at linux

Re: postfix for 7.2

2001-11-05 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Monday 05 Nov 2001 10:18 am, bero wrote: [michel@aurora michel]$ rpm -q postfix postfix-20011008-1pcreSASL This version is missing all the documentations. Thanks for maintaining Postfix - and all those daily builds at linux-easy ! Regards, Michel __

Re: postfix for 7.2

2001-11-05 Thread Levente Farkas
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > > > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > > > > > > > hi, > > > > this's a quote from http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/rhl_server.html : > > > > -- >

Re: postfix for 7.2

2001-11-05 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > > > > > hi, > > > this's a quote from http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/rhl_server.html : > > > -- > > > Mail server Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, WU IMA

Re: postfix for 7.2

2001-11-05 Thread Levente Farkas
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > > > hi, > > this's a quote from http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/rhl_server.html : > > -- > > Mail server Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, WU IMA > > -- > > so where can I find this postfix

test

2001-11-05 Thread Step 1 B
pls ignore. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list